Structure of the Universe

[jhixon]

Good morning everyone,

I have created a paper that provides the structure of the Universe and because I am not in the science field, I can't get anyone from any college to read this. Science does not seem to be open to everyone, and I have been struggling for a month trying to get someone to read this. Below is an abstract of what I'm offering and I am hoping that someone will provide a contact at a college that would be willing to read this information to consider. My goal is to move science forward and I am more than happy to share this information towards getting this published. I appreciate all who read, and thanks...

This paper explores the fundamental structure of the universe, beginning at the quantum level, where energy and matter interact through various forces. It posits that energy exists in two forms: positive energy, represented by quarks, and negative energy, represented by electrons. The interaction of these particles leads to the formation of matter through collisions that excite the Higgs field, resulting in the assembly of protons and neutrons. The paper discusses the roles of the four fundamental forces—Nuclear Strong Force, Weak Force, Electromagnetic Force, and Gravity—in shaping the universe, emphasizing the significance of quarks and their charms in determining atomic structure and behavior. It introduces the concept of negative mass and its implications for dark matter and the expansion of the universe, suggesting that negative mass density is essential for understanding cosmic acceleration. The paper concludes by addressing the complexities of time and gravity, proposing that the universe's structure is a delicate balance of positive and negative forces, which ultimately supports the existence of life, and includes the four fundamental forces in quantum formulas.

 

[jhixon]

For those of you that say negative matter/mass doesn't exist, explain this:

Any mass can be positively or negatively charged, just like a neutrino is a negatively charged neutron that is negative matter because it displaces space/time/the three forces or the definition of matter itself. We have trouble understanding that matter starts at the quantum/atomic level by displacing the three forces, so a neutrino is negative matter/mass, just like a neutron is positive matter/mass neutrally charged. We tend to think of something that takes up space as positive matter and negative nothingness as negative matter, and it's really about the charged object in the field (or a differently charged field would cause reverse functions) that determines gravities direction of plus G or minus G. Just like you use +G in math for work in our solar system and -G in math for the motion at blackholes, or closer and further apart, showing that gravity has two functions which creates symmetry in our universe, just like electrons and positrons, symmetry. Just like having positive matter and negative matter are symmetry. When matter is created, it displaces space/time/forces or the expansion of space (like putting your fist in water, the fist displaces the water and the water expands just like space does), and blackholes tearing matter apart will directly influence contraction of space as it breaks down matter that was displacing space.

 

[Jzz]

This paper explores the fundamental structure of the universe, beginning at the quantum level, where energy and matter interact through various forces. It posits that energy exists in two forms: positive energy, represented by quarks, and negative energy, represented by electrons.

Interesting theory, not least because it builds upon observed phenomena. Where does this leave neutrons? I also have (have had for many years) a new theory called "Augmented Newtonian Dynamics" or (AND) which at last seems to be enjoying a modicum of success. My story started a long time ago, when I was browsing the internet for the first time and was so overawed by this wonderful apparition, that everyone was likening to an oracle of old, that I spent quite a bit of time in trying to formulate a suitable question to put to the oracle. After thinking for a long time, I finally came up with what I thought was a suitable question. The question I eventually came up with was: "What fascinating new theories of light had arisen since Newton and Huygens had first considered the subject." I was literally agog with wanting to hear the answer to this question. Imagine my surprise on learning that there was no amazing new theory of light. In fact the situation was so bad that no-one could even explain how light travelled from point A to point B. It was this that set me off on my journey to find out what light truly was. I was (still am to an extent) fueled by rage. I think I have succeeded in coming up with a very acceptable solution but no-one seems to want to leave the esoteric philosophy that has replaced empirical science. Well that is OK too in a way, because as they say the journey is its own reward, certainly this has been true in my case. I have since published several papers in peer reviewed journals, recognized by the University Grants Commission of India. Which is about as good as it gets. Oh! A word about the internet in those days. It was literally like walking down long echoing corridors leading to academic halls peopled by brilliant academics, with more than enough time to discuss any topic on physics or science or even in rare cases something else.

 

[jhixon]

Interesting theory, not least because it builds upon observed phenomena. Where does this leave neutrons? I also have (have had for many years) a new theory called "Augmented Newtonian Dynamics" or (AND) which at last seems to be enjoying a modicum of success. My story started a long time ago, when I was browsing the internet for the first time and was so overawed by this wonderful apparition, that everyone was likening to an oracle of old, that I spent quite a bit of time in trying to formulate a suitable question to put to the oracle. After thinking for a long time, I finally came up with what I thought was a suitable question. The question I eventually came up with was what fascinating new theories of light had arisen since Newton and Huygens had first considered the subject. I was literally agog with wanting to hear the answer to this question. Imagine my surprise to learn that there was no amazing new theory of light. In fact the situation was so bad that no-one could even explain how light travelled from point A to point B. It was this that set me off on my journey to find out what light truly was. I think I have succeeded in coming up with a very acceptable solution but no-one seems to want to leave the esoteric philosophy that has replaced empirical science. Well that is OK too in a way, because as they say the journey is half the reward, certainly this has been true in my case. I have since published several papers in peer reviewed journals, recognized by the University Grants Commission of India. Which is about as good as it gets. Oh! A word about the internet in those days. It was literally like walking down long echoing corridors leading to academic halls peopled by brilliant academics, with more than enough time to discuss any topic on physics or science or even in rare cases something else.

It would be a theory if it wasn't for the fact that I solved all four forces in quantum, and quantum says this is true, and I can prove it. Now, it's just a matter of getting a college to read my work, as without a PhD they are not interested. I had 19 people look me up this week, but none have called. They wouldn't be looking me up if it was wrong, they would have just deleted it. So this is my problem now, finding a college that's not afraid of going against main stream attitude that negative mass doesn't exist. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink it. No worries, as I will send this out until attitudes change, as the right information today will be right tomorrow, and in the years to follow. Hopefully someone is brave enough to move science forward as I don't have the resources to publish this myself.

 

[Jzz]

It would be a theory if it wasn't for the fact that I solved all four forces in quantum, and quantum says this is true, and I can prove it. Now, it's just a matter of getting a college to read my work, as without a PhD they are not interested in reading it. So this is my problem.

Great! If you could explain what you mean by quantum, that would be a start.

 

[jhixon]

Quantum is the smallest scale of our universe where any energy can become any matter, and is the start of the displacement of space/time and induces the three forces to start thereby creating matter and gravity.