• Happy holidays, explorers! Thanks to each and every one of you for being part of the Space.com community!

"Super Comet: After the Impact" -- What did you think?

Page 3 - Seeking answers about space? Join the Space community: the premier source of space exploration, innovation, and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier.
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

MeteorWayne

Guest
Asteroids don't travel at thousands of km/sec. The atmospheric entry velocity is between 11.2 and 72.3 km/sec (assuming it's part of the solar system) and since almost all asteroids revolve around the sun the same way as earth, typical values are 15- 40 km/sec. Usually only Oort cloud or Halley type comets approach from the opposite direction and can hit the high end of that speed range. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>
 
A

astroguard

Guest
<b>MeteorWayne<b> wrote:<br /> <br /><i># he is indeed correct, the impact effects<br /># would be minimal at 100 km.</i><br /> <br />If one includes life-threatening radiation burns as one of the [many] impact effects, then he is <i>"indeed"</i> wrong. State what you mean, Wayne.</b></b>
 
Y

yevaud

Guest
In a strict collision (impact) event, there would be few if any radiation effects.<br /><br />FYI. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Differential Diagnosis:  </em>"<strong><em>I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are</em></strong>."<br /> </p> </div>
 
M

MeteorWayne

Guest
Are you implying something other than thermal radiation?<br /><br />What kind of "life threatening radiation" are you talking about?<br />There are none, and no reason I know of to supect there would be any. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>
 
Q

qzzq

Guest
Unless the asteroid obliterates a nuclear facility of some kind of course. <img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p>***</p> </div>
 
N

nexium

Guest
If Yevaud is correct, then dirty nuclear blasts are not comparable to small comet hits. I'm quite sure some ultra-violet is produced as well infrared and visable light. Are we quite sure negligible Xrary and gamma even at collisions at 72.3 kilometers per second? plasma is produced by high speed impacts. Neil
 
Y

yevaud

Guest
It requires one hell of an impact (impact energies, you see) to liberate any radioactivity at all. At truly enormous impact velocities, true, there will be X-Rays and Gammas, but that's far in excess of any velocities we've been discussing. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Differential Diagnosis:  </em>"<strong><em>I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are</em></strong>."<br /> </p> </div>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

W
Replies
2
Views
1K
Cosmology
CalliArcale
C
W
Replies
3
Views
1K
Cosmology
centsworth_II
C
W
Replies
7
Views
1K
R

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts