The FTL Accelerating Expansion of the Universe is Always Backward in Time!

[Atlan0001]

The universe is expanding faster than the speed of light because the flow direction of the expansion is always backward in time! IT IS THAT SIMPLE!

The universe's flow direction of time travel, NOT THAT OF ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING IN IT! is backward in time!

The unobservable future histories future light cone is not forward of the observed past histories past light cone but overlays it in a quantum entangling "superposition!" so that travelers in the universe will always be traveling in the exact equal but opposite direction to the time direction, the time flow, direction of the eternally time traveling universe itself!

DO YOU GET ME?!
----------------------------------

Albert Einstein: "God doesn't play dice with the universe."
Stephen Hawking: "Yes, God does play dice with the universe but they're loaded."

 

[Atlan0001]

Does anyone realize how fast a traveler can travel the universe if the traveler, like you, is always traveling forward in time observed from the rear in time observed? Never traveling faster than the speed of light since the so-called time dilation always applies to the future histories future light cone?!

I've always been denying the existing of time dilation except as the traveler observes time dilation forward in travel. Fast forward [observed] from however far [observed] to the rear in time of all destinations in the [observed] "observable universe."

I've also always advocated something similar to what I've expressed in the opening of this thread, just never on the scale of the accelerating expansion of an "observable universe." I've said the expansion was an accelerating expansion to "nowhere." It turns out my "nowhere" means a counterintuitive reversal of time to an "endless beginning to the universe(s)," via faster than the speed of light, just as I've stated in other ways without realizing and hitting upon a tachyon and/or antimatter solution to the universe's time flow (travel). And, as I state above and elsewhere, there is no limit to speed of travel observed forward in time from backward in time observed (which is all we observe of time, of SPACETIME, whether just across a room or across the universe).

What really screwed me up was this diagram of SPACETIME which isn't right when I realize an overlaying / inlaying superposition of the two light cones, with the past light cone's time line being the universe's time line and the future light cone's time line being the time line of all the universe contains, for a final result in the front line (so to speak) of spontaneous concurrent REALTIME (t=0 (0-point)); and in the back line back ground (again so to speak) of P/BB collapsed cosmological constant (/\) Horizon Mirror (t=*1*).

This diagram:

Time dilation - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

That bottom arrow's direction of time flow is [counterintuitively] the universe's faster-than-the-speed-of-light "accelerating expansion" direction of time flow.

 

[E.B.E1]

The universe is expanding faster than the speed of light because the flow direction of the expansion is always backward in time! IT IS THAT SIMPLE!

The universe's flow direction of time travel, NOT THAT OF ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING IN IT! is backward in time!

The unobservable future histories future light cone is not forward of the observed past histories past light cone but overlays it in a quantum entangling "superposition!" so that travelers in the universe will always be traveling in the exact equal but opposite direction to the time direction, the time flow, direction of the eternally time traveling universe itself!

DO YOU GET ME?!
----------------------------------

Albert Einstein: "God doesn't play dice with the universe."
Stephen Hawking: "Yes, God does play dice with the universe but they're loaded."

loaded dice eh!!!
very intelligent guy, i found out 2 things that scientists say were impossible, nothing can travel faster than light speed it's supposedly the universal speed limit but apparently not if the universe is expanding faster than light.
I also was informed that nothing can escape from a black hole not even light but not so as hawking radiation tells us.
what else is possible that we don't even want to explore because science hasn't caught up yet

 

[Gibsense]

E.B.E1 : " I found 2 things that scientists say were impossible, nothing can travel faster than light speed it's supposedly the universal speed limit but apparently not if the universe is expanding faster than light."


The key word in the above statement is "Travel". Although galaxies beyond the observable universe recede faster than the speed of light they do not travel through space (our space that is - it could be considered that C+ in the context of space consisting of additional dimensions - or a different combination of our 4 dimensions - cannot be ruled out).
Your second point though is, I think, valid. However, again, nothing can travel from a black hole in the sense of moving through space - not even light

PS Galaxies do in fact "travel through space", my comments are only in the context of your discussion.

 

[Atlan0001]

Once more into the breach! The universe that is observed to have existed there-then one light second away no longer exists in space and time there-now one second later in light's coordinate points future histories (-1) future light cone of SPACETIME (the instantaneous spontaneous concurrent REALTIME 'front' ('frontier')). It has traveled one second backward in time relative to here-now . . . eventually to be buried so deep in the cumulative clouds of light's coordinate points past histories (+1) past light cone of SPACETIME as to be of a piece with the collapsed cosmological constant of Planck/Big Bang 'Mirror Horizon'!

The forward facing universe in space and time doesn't begin with the observed Q-Verse of there-then, it BEGINS there-now and here-now, with "instantaneous spontaneous concurrent REALTIME 'front' ('frontier')" being relative to "emergent SPACE." A universe always in new Planck (Big Bang) creation; always in new beginning (always BEGINNING!) there-now and here-now (4-dimensional universe arising from out of 2-dimensional Flatland's canvas of "Nowhere-land" and "Nothingness" (*1*/0 = (+1,-1 (don't tell me I can't split a universe ('1' (unity)) by the simple act of dividing it by its fundamental binary base2 '0' (null unity))))!

The universe of intrinsic substance begins (exists) NOW. NOT one second ago; NOT one light-second (to countless billions of light years) away from anywhere, but HERE-NOW . . . everywhere HERE-NOW . . . thus, too, THERE-NOW and THERE-THEN regarding light's coordinate points future histories future light cone of SPACETIME (in directions and magnitudes 4-d universes springing (popping) in and out of a 2-d Flatland canvas) is!

For all that anyone says about it (including me), though, there is still energy in light's coordinate points past histories past light cone SPACETIME thanks to light's future histories future light cone of SPACETIME, else not even that would exist. Neither would exist without the overlay and inlay of the other, or the sustaining existence at every point of SPACETIME of packet-frame crossing holograms' crossroads, actually.

** (Look up 2-d fractal "Sierpinski Carpet" and 3-d fractal "Menger Sponge." Go! Go! Hyperspace-manifold "emergent SPACE" (emergent gravity)! Go! Go!) **

 

[Fest3er]

Perhaps naive but … if the distant galaxies that are viewed much further back in time, move away faster than near galaxies (nearer to present time), wouldn’t that suggest the universe expanded faster shortly after the Big Bang, and have been decelerating over time?

 

[Gibsense]

Perhaps naive but … if the distant galaxies that are viewed much further back in time, move away faster than near galaxies (nearer to present time), wouldn’t that suggest the universe expanded faster shortly after the Big Bang, and have been decelerating over time?

The Big Bang despite its name was not an explosion as per bonfire night. It isn't lots of things travelling through space from a common origin. All the 'things' of the Big Bang are comparatively stationary (only a comparatively slight travel in space for other reasons).

It is the increase in the volume of space itself that separates things (galaxies). Space increases between them.

This is usually illustrated by imagining dots on a balloon; as it is inflated the dots separate - but do not move along the balloon's surface. Another analogy is currants in a cake; as it grows in the oven the currants separate from each other.

This means that the farther away an object is then the faster it appears to move away. As you know when we 'look outwards' to distant galaxies we are also looking back in time (light takes time to travel they say) and so the further away a galaxy is then the closer it is to the Big Bang. That's the current understanding.

Just to add it was thought until recently that the universe might contain enough matter to cause gravity to slow down the expansion and eventually cause a Big Crunch. Then this was considered unlikely as the expansion appeared to be accelerating and led to an assumption that space was flat (had become flat is more accurate). However, all this is again questioned as some assessments suggest there is enough matter to 'close' the universe to be spherical in nature (not flat).
I personally attempt to explain the acceleration as an illusion brought about by our limited perception of 4D spatial geometry and the nature of time (see post "3D flatlander and the Hypersphere" diagram if interested).

 

[Fest3er]

The Big Bang despite its name was not an explosion as per bonfire night. It isn't lots of things travelling through space from a common origin. All the 'things' of the Big Bang are comparatively stationary (only a comparatively slight travel in space for other reasons).

It is the increase in the volume of space itself that separates things (galaxies). Space increases between them.

This is usually illustrated by imagining dots on a balloon; as it is inflated the dots separate - but do not move along the balloon's surface. Another analogy is currants in a cake; as it grows in the oven the currants separate from each other.

This means that the farther away an object is then the faster it appears to move away. As you know when we 'look outwards' to distant galaxies we are also looking back in time (light takes time to travel they say) and so the further away a galaxy is then the closer it is to the Big Bang. That's the current understanding.

Just to add it was thought until recently that the universe might contain enough matter to cause gravity to slow down the expansion and eventually cause a Big Crunch. Then this was considered unlikely as the expansion appeared to be accelerating and led to an assumption that space was flat (had become flat is more accurate). However, all this is again questioned as some assessments suggest there is enough matter to 'close' the universe to be spherical in nature (not flat).
I personally attempt to explain the acceleration as an illusion brought about by our limited perception of 4D spatial geometry and the nature of time (see post "3D flatlander and the Hypersphere" diagram if interested).

We measure the expansion of space indirectly, using red shift of the light from special stars. The star moves with the expansion of space relative to ourselves. Those stars at great distances are further back in time. So my question remains. Could the expansion of space simply have been faster shortly after the Big Bang and be decelerating over time until now? In other words, it behaves just as you balloon example. With a constant pressure, the surface expansion decelerates as the volume increases

 

[Gibsense]

We measure the expansion of space indirectly, using red shift of the light from special stars. The star moves with the expansion of space relative to ourselves. Those stars at great distances are further back in time. So my question remains. Could the expansion of space simply have been faster shortly after the Big Bang and be decelerating over time until now? In other words, it behaves just as you balloon example. With a constant pressure, the surface expansion decelerates as the volume increases

Yes

 

[Classical Motion]

A photon is a unit sequence of discreet quantum field. The duration and length of each quantum is constant. Only the duration and length of absence, between the quantums, changes with emitter motion.

An inverted duty cycle shift. It blinks.

Light is a flux of duty cycles. It does not blink. It has an average “on”. Like a light dimmer.

Light is only half of what you think it is.

Redshift is a duty cycle shift.

 

[Gibsense]

Redshift is a duty cycle shift.

Does this mean you are saying the photon's duty cycle is only a percentage?

 

[Classical Motion]

Without relative motion, 50% duty cycle. It's inverted. The on time is constant. Only the off time changes with motion.

 

[Classical Motion]

This is hard to understand. The on time does NOT come from the emitter. The emitter is NOT on for a time and then off for a time. This is because the photon is emitted as a chunk, not a stream. The emission is an instant affair. But the photon that is emitted…..does have a length and a duration.

Think of the emitter as being in rotation. Or think of an antenna. And think of a 360 degree input.

During the first 180 degrees, a field is built up, that field will reach out into space ½ wavelength. That length of field is then cut. That instantly lets the field fly out. The field length is ½ WL and has a1/2 period duration as it flies by. But it was emitted instantly.

As soon as it was emitted at 189 degrees, another field is starting to grow. It will be emitted at 360 degrees, another half wave field.

On the other end, the detector end, we measure a 50% duty cycle. If the emitter is moving away, the off time gets longer, not the emission. The emission is constant.

If the emitter is moving closer, the off time gets shorter.

And the on time is NOT a square wave. It’s a saw tooth ramp. But that ramp has two intensities. And electric and a magnetic acceleration.

It’s an inverted duty cycle shift, not a Doppler shift.

 

[Classical Motion]

The grow time is constant too, but the distance between emitter and detector changes with motion. Thus changing the duty cycle.

 

[Classical Motion]

Emitter motion, space width modulates the space between photons.

 

[Classical Motion]

Think of a hay baler. The bales are the same length. But the space between bales depends on the baler velocity.

 

[Atlan0001]

As the saying goes (and I'm one of those who have said it many times in many ways), "the map is not the territory" (the light and lightspeed SPACETIME topographical map of the universe is not the actual physical topography of the universe on the spot, everywhere the actual spot is! And the topographical map grows more useless with all increase in distance acceleration from Earth. It simply has no relationship to reality, the "spooky actions at a distance", as Einstein would put it.

The difference between the topographies, between relativity and reality, is faster than the speed of light, from slightly faster to vastly faster.

 

[Classical Motion]

The universe has to change every few years to keep up with our concepts. I can't wait to see what it ends up as.

 

[Gibsense]

what else is possible that we don't even want to explore because science hasn't caught up yet

It's not that science has been wrong so much as new perspectives have been found - unanticipated contexts. Which is what you said - in a different way

 

[Atlan0001]

"Repetition is the heart of instruction." -- Gen. George Patton, Jr.

When it comes to coordinate points past-future histories ((t=+1) (t=-1)) SPACETIME, coordinate points past histories (t+1) is the road always observed from the most distant Horizon to you the observer (t=+1, 2, 3, 4, 5).

SPACETIME coordinate points future histories (t=-1) is the unobserved, unobservable, road of emitted light and light-time to be traveled -- also yet to be traveled (yet to be surpassed) -- to any destination by any traveler (-5, -4, -3, -2, t=-1). Thus, you will never travel backward in your own line of time, though distant observers, from their differing points and lines of time, will always observe your holographic twin image to do so (you, the REALTIME NOW traveler, having disappeared from their SPACETIME observation into a future history.

What about you the traveler?!

Once more, Stephen Hawking's superposition "Grand Central Station of Universe" with its "t=0 clock" under which everything passes at all times (reducing to entangled, entangling, spontaneously concurrent (t=0) REALTIME NOW (t=0) instant moment (your "spooky action a distance')), while never surpassing (t=0).

What does it mean up close and personal to you?! It means traveling, and a to be traveled, topology of "doors" or "doorways" ("horizons") through the universe, doors of future histories always opening before you -- all the way to concurrent (t=0) destinations -- and doors of past histories always closing behind you toward that most distant (collapsed cosmological constant (/\) of) Horizon! Thus, counterintuitively, you the traveler are -- any traveler is -- always traveling backward in time behind you!!!!

 

[Fest3er]

A photon is a unit sequence of discreet quantum field. The duration and length of each quantum is constant. Only the duration and length of absence, between the quantums, changes with emitter motion.

An inverted duty cycle shift. It blinks.

Light is a flux of duty cycles. It does not blink. It has an average “on”. Like a light dimmer.

Light is only half of what you think it is.

Redshift is a duty cycle shift.

We’re using red shift to measure distances. I’m not sure what point you’re making.

 

[Gibsense]

Thus, counterintuitively, you the traveler are -- any traveler is -- always traveling backward in time behind you!!!!

Not in agreement here - time is always positive. I suggest time is a process and not a dimension. Negative time, where applied is about direction i.e. a positive process in the opposite direction. NB all in 4D SPATIAL dimensional space. The 3D spatial awareness that we have - the Macro universe - is movement in the 4th spatial dimension. This movement is the thing we call time.

The point is that movement is positive. I suggest that UNmovement is difficult to conceive without adding another spatial dimension. Our reality seems to be four-dimensional. How compatible with GR is this idea (GR being a well-proven framework)?

 

[Gibsense]

The idea that time marches on regardless seems reasonable in the context of a BB universe However, where I depart from standard theory is the direction that time moves in. If we consider time as a process there can be a variety of directions in which the process may take place.

Consider: If the universe is curved (say spherical ) then space is curved. If time occurs perpendicular to space (no argument here) then time does point in different directions. This is confirmed in Relativity; time rotates where space is curved by gravity such that an outside observer measures its process as less (time is observed as slower due to the angle from rotation)

 

[Gibsense]

If we combine these ideas of a positive time process (I have called it a Timewave since 1997) with the idea that the world of Quantum Mechanics is a landscape of reality, then:

• The QM Landscape is all of history and future written (but the future is malleable by the Timewave (the timewave IS our universe we take part in)
• As the Timewave passes it can observe and amend the QM landscape
• If the direction of the time process is reversed (apparent negative time i.e. a positive process going back over the QM Landscape) then it would be possible to return to the past
• Although time travel is therefore possible theoretically and the QM Landscape can be changed this will not change the future that we came from; it would simply change the QM Landscape
• Following (repeating) positive Timewaves (universes) would engage an altered QM Landscape
• Also if the timewave traveller were to reverse time direction after changing the past it would not be in the original Timewave we came from.
• The original timewave (universe would continue and also change the written future as 'normal' but Grandfather would still exist)
• The Time-traveller is now 'returning' in a positive direction and will continue to amend the future but this time it is a future that has been amended by the Timewave (universe) that he started from. His descendants can be engaged because in the original timewave, everything proceeded as normal even if someone on his expedition decided to test the Grandfather Paradox.
• So, there is no need to produce multiple universes at every event; rather a succession of universes (timewaves) that produce new futures to an existing Quantum Landscape.
• The thing then of crucial evolving importance is not our Universe or the following universes but the basic QM Landscape
• It may be wrong to think of the QM world as a changing ' Just Is ' as it could be throbbing in Virtual Time

 

[Gibsense]

Given the above scenario, if anything has travelled back in time to our 'here' then we would expect to encounter 'discontinuities' - problems with cause and effect. A result that does not appear to have a cause.
The cause of an effect would be hidden in the complexity of Timewaves


The question is: Are the Timewave universes digital or a continuum? and
Am I sane? Lol