The fundamental error of the Michelson Morley experiment

[Marvas]

Michelson Morrey experiment did not disprove aether. Because it was fundamentally flawed.​

by Marius L. Vasile

''The Michelson–Morley experiment was an attempt to measure the motion of the Earth relative to the luminiferous aether,[A 1] a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of light waves. The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by American physicists Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley at what is now Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and published in November of the same year.[1]

The experiment compared the speed of light in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter, including their laboratory, through the luminiferous aether, or "aether wind" as it was sometimes called. The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference between the speed of light in the direction of movement through the presumed aether, and the speed at right angles.

This result is generally considered to be the first strong evidence against some aether theories, as well as initiating a line of research that eventually led to special relativity, which rules out motion against an aether.[A''

Michelson–Morley experiment - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

So the whole MM experiment is based on the premise that if the earth is moving through a stationary aether than the speed of light should change depending on the direction in which earth is moving. This is a completelly false and misleading assumption, which shows that these relative scientists really have no ideea how waves propagate in a medium.
If light is a wave, you can't add the velocity of the wave to that of the source, as these relative scientists expected. It will still travel with the speed of light regardless how fast or slow the source is moving relative to the aether medium. Just like a sound wave does. The speed of sound does not increase if the speed of the source increases relative to the air medium.

If a speeding train horns while it passes a station, the people on the station dont measure an increased speed of sound of the horn. What they measure is a an increased or decreased frequency (and wavelength) due to the Doppler effect. The speed of the wave is exactly the same.

Michelson Morrey experiment makes the false assumption that because the earth is moving, the speed of light should somehow be increased in the direction of movement, and decreased in the opposite direction. This is completelly false if light is a wave in a stationary aether, which was the main assumption of the experiment. It will travel at exactly the same speed regardless of the speed of the source. So there will be no change in the speed of light in either direction. Which is exactly what they seen: no difference. How does that disprove that aether exists ?! It si completelly illogical to draw this conclusion, yet here we have dozens of the worlds brightest scientists, many Nobel laureates, behaving like utter and complete fools who make the most illogical assumption and then based on it misinterpret their experiments in exactly the opposite way in which they should be interpretated.

What is truly incredible is that no one has seen their fundamental error before, including the greatest minds of science like ...none, and that this stupid experiment is considered for more than a century by all these relative scientists as the utimate proof that aether does not exist. When it should have been obvious for anyone who knows basic wave physics that Michelson Morley made a fundamental error in the very premise of the experiment, which could only lead to an erroneus conclusion.

The reason why the speed of light is the same in all frames of reference is because the medium of light, aether, is the only frame of reference for light waves, and the speed of light simply does not depend to any other frames. The speed of light only depends to ITS MEDIUM, which is the AETHER, and light only moves relative to its own fixed frame of reference. That’s why an observer will always measure the speed of light waves in a 'vacuum' which is aether to be the same, regardless if he is on a rocket or on a planet.

The speed of transmission of the sound remains a constant regardless of the frequency or the wavelength. The speed of sound only depends on the state of the air (or gas) not on the characteristics of the generating source.

Doppler Effect

Even the relative scientists from NASA got this one right. The speed of sound in air is constant and it is not affected at all by the source, only by the medium. Similarly, the speed of light in aether or 'vacuum' is constant because it is not affected at all by the source, only by the medium- which is aether. It's so simple. But of course they cant make this simple logical inference, because they are relatively stupid.

 

[Classical Motion]

It would be nice if there were just one error. But there are many, how much time do you have?

 

[Classical Motion]

Think about how sound is emitted. Sound has to be accelerated from the source. To emit a wavelength of sound it takes one period to accelerate it, or stream it from the source.

If the source is not moving, it takes one period to stream one wavelength long in medium.

But if the source is moving while streaming, then the length of the stream can be added to, or subtracted from that normal length. The length of motion is vector added to the stream length. The total stream length is what you hear.

This is not too hard to grasp. And clearly see. And clearly hear.

The motion of the ear, can also effect the listening time. The period. If the source is still, and you are moving, your motion also has the Doppler effect.

And it is the same effect. Symmetric. If the source moves at X velocity and changes tone by Y, Then if only the ear is moving at same velocity, the same tone shift happens. Both motions have the same effect. And the speed of sound depends and is limited by the media. NOT the acceleration. Acceleration just changes the intensity and frequency, not the speed of sound.

Now lets look and compare to light. Light is not streamed, light is quantum. What does quantum really mean physically? It means discreet, set with length and intensity, and instant. The quantum principle is not math. It’s a physical dynamic. Matter’s digital dynamic.

Light unlike sound does not need to be accelerated, light is already at c velocity before it is emitted. And is why all light is at c speed. The light field is emitted as a chunk, not a stream. Think of two metal spheres being rotated with a spinning hub. When the wires are cut, the spheres just change direction, not speed, and the sphere is a chunk…...and it changed direction in an instant.

Now instead of spheres, think of the radius of a EM field. When cut at the origin, the radius quits swinging and darts straight out. That radius keeps it’s length, and is emitted as a chunk. IN an INSTANT.

That’s why the speed of the emitter is NOT added to the speed of the emission. There is no acceleration or streaming time. Not matter how the emitter is moving, each emission has a unique location in space and time. Because it’s instant. Only an instant can define a space point.

And that’s why light is discreet and not a stream or an alternating waveform. It has a duty cycle. An extremely accurate duty cycle. With no relative motion, the duty cycle is 50%. And the velocity is c. We have never measured c. We have only measured the velocity of the flux of light, which will always be an average measurement. AND that average would probably cover a directional difference.

The motion of the emitter can not vary the length of the emission, like sound can. But the motion of the emitted does effect the duty cycle of the detected light. In other words it varies the length of space between the lengths of emissions. This would be an inverted duty cycle to an electrical engineer.

Today we use pulse width modulation for many signal functions. Light is Space width modulated with emitter motion. Of course no ones knows of this.

The motion of the light detector is much different. This will change the length of the detected emission. And the space length between emissions. But both are changed equally.

This is highly asymmetric, not symmetric like sound.

And when preforming light and radar timings and experiments, it makes a huge difference between a reflection and an emission. An emission is an instant act, a reflection is an instant act too, but it takes a duration. An emission is an instant cut radius, a reflection is a directional change of length, and the length has duration. This confuses many of our concepts.

No one seems to know this either. This should be easy to see with a few radar guns and a highway. Sound does not do this. Because sound emission and sound reflection have the same duration.

Although I have never worked in electronic warfare, I’m sure this principle has been put to advantage.

Whether they understand it or not. One could easily imitate a moving object. Or a miss-moving object. It would depend on how sharp the detection software is.

You know, if someone did find a huge new finding about basic physics, wouldn’t it be to advantage to keep it quiet as long as possible? Or if they built a semi-sentient A.I., wouldn’t it be kept secret?

The secret advantage might be better than the fame and fortune. Even more power. More security.

It’s just an opinion. I think redshift is a duty cycle shift.

 

[Gibsense]

What is truly incredible is that no one has seen their fundamental error before, including the greatest minds of science like ...none, and that this stupid experiment is considered for more than a century by all these relative scientists as the utimate proof that aether does not exist. When it should have been obvious for anyone who knows basic wave physics that Michelson Morley made a fundamental error in the very premise of the experiment, which could only lead to an erroneus conclusion.

Well done, better expressed than I could have done

 

[Marvas]

The motion of the ear, can also effect the listening time. The period. If the source is still, and you are moving, your motion also has the Doppler effect.

And it is the same effect. Symmetric. If the source moves at X velocity and changes tone by Y, Then if only the ear is moving at same velocity, the same tone shift happens. Both motions have the same effect.

Actually, for sound waves the Doppler shift is not symmetric. There are different equations for moving source and for moving observer.

Moving source: f ’= f (v/v+vs)
Moving observer: f ’= f (v+vo/v)

If aether exists, then it should not be symmetric for light waves either (as it is assumed by mainstream relative physics). This is why I proposed the following test to prove that aether exists:

A TEST FOR AETHER USING THE DOPPLER EFFECT

The Doppler effect for sound is calculated using a set of equations, which differ for moving source and for moving observer. This is because of the preferred frame of reference which is given by the rest frame of the medium in which sound travels. In

www.academia.edu

A test for Aether using Doppler effect

The Doppler effect for sound is calculated using a set of equations, which differ for moving source and for moving observer. This is because...

vasileffect.blogspot.com

Think about how sound is emitted. Sound has to be accelerated from the source. To emit a wavelength of sound it takes one period to accelerate it, or stream it from the source.

I dont think sound waves have any acceleration. Because they dont have any MASS. Being massless, they cant have any acceleration.

Sound waves are not objects with mass, like particles, they are the disturbances which are propagated by vibrating air particles with a constant velocity. The object/source which causes the air molecules to vibrate might have acceleration though.

You know, if someone did find a huge new finding about basic physics, wouldn’t it be to advantage to keep it quiet as long as possible? Or if they built a semi-sentient A.I., wouldn’t it be kept secret?

Of course ! Thats where all these UFOs that defy gravity come from. They're not from out of this world. But the men in black lie they are made by the little grey people and rely on clowns like Bob Lazar to fool us they are alien made and they have no clue what they are and how they work.
They're man made machines, and it's probably some top secret millitary agency like Darpa who discovered antigravity ******* around. Like they did with the Covid gain of function. They blamed the chinese bats and pangolins for it, but what do you know, it was also man made. Basically it was a secret bio-weapon made by US in China.

 

[Classical Motion]

There is a possibility of an aether or a media, but it would have to be a field media, not a mass media. The background static. I assume BG static is omni directional. Because the emitters of this orphan emission is all around us. No net alignment. But if there were some alignment it might very well effect and give light a velocity factor thru it. A directional velocity factor.

But I seriously doubt it. Light in space is not physically interactive with other light. It’s only a spacial superposition, not a physical one, like angular superpositions are.

This BG static needs to be studied much more. It might possibly be indirectly related to gravity.

But in any case, to measure c of light, we can’t use flux, we have to use one photon. Light is like a rain shower. But we have to measure one drop.

If we could ever phase laser rain, it would be the king of beam punchers. The hottest tip.

An x-ray phased laser might slice a small moon. Or part of a small star.

Star modulation might be possible with a phased laser. Sunspots.

 

[Marvas]

Light in space is not physically interactive with other light. It’s only a spacial superposition, not a physical one, like angular superpositions are.

But it is, that's why it interferres with other light waves, just like other waves do. Destructive and constructive interferrence can only occur if the waves are physically interacting with each other.

 

[Marvas]

The speed of transmission of the sound remains a constant regardless of the frequency or the wavelength. The speed of sound only depends on the state of the air (or gas) not on the characteristics of the generating source.

Doppler Effect

Even the relative scientists from NASA got this one right. The speed of sound in air is constant and it is not affected at all by the source, only by the medium. Similarly, the speed of light in aether or 'vacuum' is constant because it is not affected at all by the source, only by the medium- which is aether. It's so simple. But of course they cant make this simple logical inference, because they are relatively stupid.

 

[Classical Motion]

Emissions are linear fields. Charge fields are angular. These fields have different rules, different interactions, with each other.

Angular fields have “fit” with superposition, linear fields do not.

Two laser beams can cross each other and continue on their way. Two flashlight beams can too.

Two electron beams can not. Two proton beams can not. One E beam and one P beam can not.

One type interacts and one does not. A light beam can pass thru many other light beams and still hit it’s target with all it’s power.

Any combination of linear fields can occupy same space same time.

But with angular fields, only certain combinations can occupy SSST. With like angular fields, both fields stay OUT of the same space same time. They repel each other. Unlike fields can occupy SSST.

But only the fields, NOT the particles.

 

[Marvas]

If you dont believe me you can ask ChatGPT:

Does the speed of a sound wave depend on the velocity of the source ?

ChatGPT wrote:

The speed of a sound wave does not depend on the velocity of the source. The speed of sound is determined by the properties of the medium through which it travels, such as air, water, or a solid material. These properties include temperature, density, and elasticity.

However, the velocity of the source can affect the observed frequency and wavelength of the sound wave due to the Doppler effect. If the source is moving toward the observer, the frequency appears higher (a higher pitch), and if the source is moving away, the frequency appears lower (a lower pitch). But the actual speed of the sound wave in the medium remains constant regardless of the source's motion.