The missing near side crust of the moon
Moon map theory
Knowing the correct scientific and geological explanation for the existence of the lunar seas is considered a window to knowing many of the mysterious secrets of the moon and the earth, and the lunar map theory is considered that scientific window.
Moon map theory criteria
The moon map theory is based on the following criteria:
1_Its compatibility with the scientific geological data and facts about the moon and the earth
2_Its connection with reality and logic
3_Its suitability for study and application
4_It is a scientific, geological and logical explanation for a number of unsolved scientific questions about the moon.
abstract
There is a geological relationship between the Earth and the Moon. The reason for this relationship is a collision between the Earth and the Moon millions of years ago. This collision resulted in the Earth gaining a crust from the surface of the nearby Moon. This acquired crust is the reason for the existence of the lunar seas and the continents of the Earth. This collision is also the reason for the existence of life on Earth through water and lunar soil, which contains the elements necessary for life. The lunar depressions or lunar seas that we see on the moon are the effects of that collision and are at the same time the geological form of the ancient continents of the Earth.
Introduction.
The scientific result of the lunar map theory is the scientific and geological explanation for many scientific points and questions about the moon that still have no scientific solutions and answers to this day. These scientific questions were the main motivation for research and study and an important step that led us to preliminary scientific evidence of the existence of a geological relationship between the Earth and the Moon through analyzing and linking the results of these questions together. We will explain these points and scientific questions as follows:
1_ Why are the lunar seas located on the near side of the moon and not on the far side, and what is the reason for the geological difference between the two sides?
2_ Why is the thickness of the crust on the far side of the moon twice as thick as the thickness of the crust on the near side?
3_ What is the reason for the similarity of oxygen isotopes between the Earth and the moon?
4_ Why is the continental crust older than the ocean floor crust, as the age of the continental crust is close to the age of the moon and the age of the ocean floor is much less?
5_ Why is the thickness of the continental crust greater than the thickness of the ocean floor crust?
6_ Why is there a difference in the geological and chemical properties between the continental crust and the ocean crust?
7_Why is the percentage of decrease in the thickness of the crust of the near side of the moon close to the percentage of increase in the thickness of the crust of the Earth’s continents?
8_ Why are there mountain ranges on the edges of the lunar seas from all directions?
9_Why are impact craters found in abundance outside the lunar maria and rare inside the lunar maria?
also moon map theory will be a scientific and geological explanation for a number of other scientific questions that are still unsolved.
Analysis and linking of scientific data
1 - The presence of lunar seas on the near side and their absence on the far side. The prevailing scientific explanation is that meteorites are the reason for the presence of these seas, as these meteorites were able to break the crust of the near side of the moon. Which led to the flow of lava, and when analyzing this scientific explanation, we find it scientifically and geologically convincing that there was a body that caused the breaking of the crust of the near side of the moon and was the reason for the existence of the lunar seas. But it is not entirely convincing from a geological point of view that meteorites are the reason for the existence of very wide depressions that cause lunar seas, the diameter of one of which is the Oceanus procellarum reaching more than 2500 km, and the lunar sea imbrium, reaching more than 1100 km. And other seas with very large areas, and this is what makes us think that there is a very great event, an event that is bigger and greater than just thinking about meteors or asteroids that can be the reason for the existence of very wide depressions with a depth of tens of kilometers. It's much more than just thinking that meteorites could break up the crust and create seas, some of which are the size of a continent, on the near side of the moon, and meteorites couldn't do the same thing on the far side. Although the far side of the moon is full of impact craters
What confirms that the near side of the moon was exposed to a giant event when we study some scientific data about the geology of the near side of the moon
2_ Analysis and correlation of scientific data on the geology of the lunar seas The lunar seas are very wide depressions, plains and valleys that formed the lunar seas, which are almost a sea when viewed from Earth due to the clear similarity between the lunar seas. These seas are very wide, and the diameter of the ocean of storms reaches More than 2500 km and the Sea of Rains to more than 1100 km and there are many other wide lunar seas. There are scientific geological data in the lunar seas that we will analyze and link with some other lunar data.
1_There are long mountain ranges on all sides at the edges of the lunar seas. These mountain ranges extend to vast distances and high altitudes.
montes Caucasus This mountain range is located on the northeastern edge of the Imperium Sea .This mountain range extends 550 km
montes apenninus This mountain range is located on the southeastern edge of the Imperium Sea. The length of this mountain range reaches 600 km
montes Jura This mountain range lies on the strange northern edge of the near side of the Moon and extends for 420 km.
montes alpes This mountain range lies on the northeastern edge of the Imperium Sea and extends for 280 km.
montes Haemus This mountain range is located on the southwestern edge of the lunar sea Serenitis This mountain range extends for 600 km
There are many other mountain ranges with great distances and heights that are found on the edges of the different lunar seas from all directions.
2_ One of the scientific data for the near side of the moon is the abundance of impact craters outside the lunar maria and the scarcity of impact craters inside the lunar maria.
Analysis and correlation of lunar geological data 1 and 2 Leading us to the hypothesis that the near side of the moon was exposed to a giant event that would be the largest event in the solar system.
The presence of long and towering mountain ranges at the edges of the lunar seas from all directions leads us to an important scientific result that is easy for any specialist in geology, earth sciences and planets. To reach it when analyzing and linking this lunar geological data because it will be a natural geological result. This result can be summarized in that the near side of the moon was exposed to a giant collision From one giant body at a time This giant body, larger than the moon, was the result of this collision.
1_ The formation of mountain ranges at the edges of the contact areas between the moon and the giant body, and this is a natural geological and physical result.
2_ Increase in impact craters outside the lunar maria and decrease in them inside the lunar marie is a natural result of the moon colliding with a giant body larger than it in size, because the lunar seas were areas of contact with the giant body. It is natural that there are few impact craters inside lunar seas and these impact craters increase outside the lunar seas due to the huge rocks flying great distances as a result of this collision
3_ This collision resulted in the giant body gaining a crust from the near side of the moon due to the presence of geological, chemical, physical and other reasons that helped and enabled the acquisition of a crust from the near side of the moon. This acquired crust was the reason for the existence of the lunar seas, and this leads us to know the scientific and geological explanation for the existence of the lunar seas.
After analyzing and linking the lunar geological data together, the picture becomes clearer. In light of the results of analyzing and linking the lunar geological data, we can correct or modify the prevailing scientific interpretation regarding the fact that meteorites were able to to break the crust of the near side of the moon Which caused the lava to flow, and we will correct this prevailing scientific explanation, and at the same time this correct explanation will be evidence confirming the hypothesis that the moon was exposed to a giant collision.
Correcting the prevailing scientific explanation that meteorites were able to break the crust of the near side of the moon and cause lava flows
Meteorites and asteroids can never be the cause of the existence of these very wide depressions in the lunar seas, nor can they cause such great depth in the lunar seas in any way. As evidence that the far side of the moon is most distinguished by the abundance of impact craters without lunar seas, we arrive at a scientific conclusion that can be summarized as follows:
Only a giant body larger than the moon could break the crust of the near side of the moon and reach the depth that causes the lava flows..
The missing crust of the near side of the moon
The result we have reached, indicates that the moon was exposed to a giant collision by one giant body at one time, which resulted in that giant body acquiring a crust from the near side of the moon. The reason for the existence of the lunar seas.This leads us to another result, which is that there is a missing crust from the near side of the moon, the acquired crust, which was the cause and geological consequence of the existence of the lunar seas. There must be a missing crust on the giant body, which is considered a trace and geological evidence of the occurrence of the giant collision, and at the same time this crust must match the geological and chemical properties of the near side of the moon.
Since the scientific result of the moon map theory indicates that there is a geological relationship between the Earth and the Moon, the cause of this relationship is a collision between the Earth and the Moon, which resulted in the Earth gaining a crust from the side near the Moon. This crust is the reason for the existence of the lunar seas and the continents of the Earth, and the lunar seas are a result of this collision and at the same time they are the geological form of the continents of the Earth.
Linking the result we have arrived at with the scientific result of the lunar map theory.
Based on the analysis and linking of the lunar geological data and the results we have arrived at with the scientific result of the lunar map theory, we find that in order for the result of the lunar map theory to become scientifically true, The following scientific evidence must be available.
1_Scientific geological and chemical evidence proves the existence of a difference in the properties between the continental crust and the ocean floor crust.
2_Scientific geological and chemical evidence proves the similarity in properties between the crust of continents and the near side of the moon.
In order to prove the validity of the lunar map theory and the scientific fact it revealed, and that the lunar seas are not the result of meteorites or asteroids, but rather the result of a great event that is considered the largest event in the solar system, we must show the scientific evidence. Which proves the existence of a difference in the geological and chemical properties between the continental crust and the ocean floor crust, as well as scientific evidence that proves the existence of a similarity in the geological and chemical properties between the continental crust and the moon.
1_ Scientific evidence that proves the existence of a difference in the geological and chemical properties between the continental crust and the ocean floor crust.
Among these evidences are agreed-upon scientific facts. These facts are considered scientific questions that confuse scientists without scientific solutions and answers to this day.
Which will be scientific evidence proving the validity of the moon map theory, and at the same time the moon map theory will be a scientific answer to those scientific questions.
We will mention them as follows:
1_The crust of the Earth's continents is older than the crust of the ocean floor.
2_The difference in geological and chemical properties between the continental crust and the ocean floor crust
3_The thickness of the crust of the Earth's continents is greater than the thickness of the crust of the ocean floor, and the percentage of increase in the thickness of the crust of the Earth's continents is equal to the percentage of decrease in the thickness of the crust of the near side of the Moon.
4_The density of the ocean floor crust is heavier than the density of the continental crust. The density of the ocean floor crust. 2.9 The density of the continental crust is 2.7
5_ There is a fundamental difference in the geophysical properties between the continental crust and the oceanic crust, and the continents and oceans cannot have the same structure.
2_Scientific evidence that proves the similarity in geological and chemical properties between the crust of continents and the moon
1_Similarity of volcanic rock crystallization and volcanic activity between the crust of continents and the crust of lunar seas
2_Matching oxygen isotopes between continental crust and moon
3_ The age of the continental crust matches the age of the moon.
4_The percentage of decrease in the thickness of the crust of the near side of the Moon is close to the percentage of increase in the thickness of the crust of the Earth's continents
These geological and chemical data, whether they show differences or similarities in geological and chemical properties, clearly indicate that the continental crust is not one of the basic components of the Earth and that there is a geological connection and relationship. Between the crust of the continents and the near side of the moon, specifically the lunar seas. I also want to point out that there is certainly other scientific data unknown to me that confirms the existence of a difference in properties between the crust of continents and the crust of oceans, or a similarity in properties between the crust of continents and the moon. Which may be known to any specialist in the field of earth sciences, planetary sciences and geological sciences.
Is there more accurate and clear scientific evidence that proves the validity of the moon map theory
Despite the results I have reached, which are based on scientific data and facts, there are still scientific questions that remain unsolved to this day, and despite the fact that these results are a scientific explanation and answer to these questions.
This scientific evidence is still not enough for the moon map theory to become a scientific fact. I consider the results I have reached to be scientific indicators, or we can call them a scientific window through which we can discover scientific geological evidence. More accurate and clear evidence that leaves no doubt about the truth of the moon map theory This is what happened, and through deep study and research in light of these results, I came to know the scientific evidence that cuts off all doubt with certainty. Because of the strength and clarity of this evidence, I considered these results to be merely initial indicators and evidence only.
I am just want to publish The theory with that evidence in a scientific journal specialized in the field of Earth, planetary and space sciences in general.
I hope that goodness and peace will
prevail over all the peoples of the earth
Adel Saleh Alabyadh
Moon map theory
Knowing the correct scientific and geological explanation for the existence of the lunar seas is considered a window to knowing many of the mysterious secrets of the moon and the earth, and the lunar map theory is considered that scientific window.
Moon map theory criteria
The moon map theory is based on the following criteria:
1_Its compatibility with the scientific geological data and facts about the moon and the earth
2_Its connection with reality and logic
3_Its suitability for study and application
4_It is a scientific, geological and logical explanation for a number of unsolved scientific questions about the moon.
abstract
There is a geological relationship between the Earth and the Moon. The reason for this relationship is a collision between the Earth and the Moon millions of years ago. This collision resulted in the Earth gaining a crust from the surface of the nearby Moon. This acquired crust is the reason for the existence of the lunar seas and the continents of the Earth. This collision is also the reason for the existence of life on Earth through water and lunar soil, which contains the elements necessary for life. The lunar depressions or lunar seas that we see on the moon are the effects of that collision and are at the same time the geological form of the ancient continents of the Earth.
Introduction.
The scientific result of the lunar map theory is the scientific and geological explanation for many scientific points and questions about the moon that still have no scientific solutions and answers to this day. These scientific questions were the main motivation for research and study and an important step that led us to preliminary scientific evidence of the existence of a geological relationship between the Earth and the Moon through analyzing and linking the results of these questions together. We will explain these points and scientific questions as follows:
1_ Why are the lunar seas located on the near side of the moon and not on the far side, and what is the reason for the geological difference between the two sides?
2_ Why is the thickness of the crust on the far side of the moon twice as thick as the thickness of the crust on the near side?
3_ What is the reason for the similarity of oxygen isotopes between the Earth and the moon?
4_ Why is the continental crust older than the ocean floor crust, as the age of the continental crust is close to the age of the moon and the age of the ocean floor is much less?
5_ Why is the thickness of the continental crust greater than the thickness of the ocean floor crust?
6_ Why is there a difference in the geological and chemical properties between the continental crust and the ocean crust?
7_Why is the percentage of decrease in the thickness of the crust of the near side of the moon close to the percentage of increase in the thickness of the crust of the Earth’s continents?
8_ Why are there mountain ranges on the edges of the lunar seas from all directions?
9_Why are impact craters found in abundance outside the lunar maria and rare inside the lunar maria?
also moon map theory will be a scientific and geological explanation for a number of other scientific questions that are still unsolved.
Analysis and linking of scientific data
1 - The presence of lunar seas on the near side and their absence on the far side. The prevailing scientific explanation is that meteorites are the reason for the presence of these seas, as these meteorites were able to break the crust of the near side of the moon. Which led to the flow of lava, and when analyzing this scientific explanation, we find it scientifically and geologically convincing that there was a body that caused the breaking of the crust of the near side of the moon and was the reason for the existence of the lunar seas. But it is not entirely convincing from a geological point of view that meteorites are the reason for the existence of very wide depressions that cause lunar seas, the diameter of one of which is the Oceanus procellarum reaching more than 2500 km, and the lunar sea imbrium, reaching more than 1100 km. And other seas with very large areas, and this is what makes us think that there is a very great event, an event that is bigger and greater than just thinking about meteors or asteroids that can be the reason for the existence of very wide depressions with a depth of tens of kilometers. It's much more than just thinking that meteorites could break up the crust and create seas, some of which are the size of a continent, on the near side of the moon, and meteorites couldn't do the same thing on the far side. Although the far side of the moon is full of impact craters
What confirms that the near side of the moon was exposed to a giant event when we study some scientific data about the geology of the near side of the moon
2_ Analysis and correlation of scientific data on the geology of the lunar seas The lunar seas are very wide depressions, plains and valleys that formed the lunar seas, which are almost a sea when viewed from Earth due to the clear similarity between the lunar seas. These seas are very wide, and the diameter of the ocean of storms reaches More than 2500 km and the Sea of Rains to more than 1100 km and there are many other wide lunar seas. There are scientific geological data in the lunar seas that we will analyze and link with some other lunar data.
1_There are long mountain ranges on all sides at the edges of the lunar seas. These mountain ranges extend to vast distances and high altitudes.
montes Caucasus This mountain range is located on the northeastern edge of the Imperium Sea .This mountain range extends 550 km
montes apenninus This mountain range is located on the southeastern edge of the Imperium Sea. The length of this mountain range reaches 600 km
montes Jura This mountain range lies on the strange northern edge of the near side of the Moon and extends for 420 km.
montes alpes This mountain range lies on the northeastern edge of the Imperium Sea and extends for 280 km.
montes Haemus This mountain range is located on the southwestern edge of the lunar sea Serenitis This mountain range extends for 600 km
There are many other mountain ranges with great distances and heights that are found on the edges of the different lunar seas from all directions.
2_ One of the scientific data for the near side of the moon is the abundance of impact craters outside the lunar maria and the scarcity of impact craters inside the lunar maria.
Analysis and correlation of lunar geological data 1 and 2 Leading us to the hypothesis that the near side of the moon was exposed to a giant event that would be the largest event in the solar system.
The presence of long and towering mountain ranges at the edges of the lunar seas from all directions leads us to an important scientific result that is easy for any specialist in geology, earth sciences and planets. To reach it when analyzing and linking this lunar geological data because it will be a natural geological result. This result can be summarized in that the near side of the moon was exposed to a giant collision From one giant body at a time This giant body, larger than the moon, was the result of this collision.
1_ The formation of mountain ranges at the edges of the contact areas between the moon and the giant body, and this is a natural geological and physical result.
2_ Increase in impact craters outside the lunar maria and decrease in them inside the lunar marie is a natural result of the moon colliding with a giant body larger than it in size, because the lunar seas were areas of contact with the giant body. It is natural that there are few impact craters inside lunar seas and these impact craters increase outside the lunar seas due to the huge rocks flying great distances as a result of this collision
3_ This collision resulted in the giant body gaining a crust from the near side of the moon due to the presence of geological, chemical, physical and other reasons that helped and enabled the acquisition of a crust from the near side of the moon. This acquired crust was the reason for the existence of the lunar seas, and this leads us to know the scientific and geological explanation for the existence of the lunar seas.
After analyzing and linking the lunar geological data together, the picture becomes clearer. In light of the results of analyzing and linking the lunar geological data, we can correct or modify the prevailing scientific interpretation regarding the fact that meteorites were able to to break the crust of the near side of the moon Which caused the lava to flow, and we will correct this prevailing scientific explanation, and at the same time this correct explanation will be evidence confirming the hypothesis that the moon was exposed to a giant collision.
Correcting the prevailing scientific explanation that meteorites were able to break the crust of the near side of the moon and cause lava flows
Meteorites and asteroids can never be the cause of the existence of these very wide depressions in the lunar seas, nor can they cause such great depth in the lunar seas in any way. As evidence that the far side of the moon is most distinguished by the abundance of impact craters without lunar seas, we arrive at a scientific conclusion that can be summarized as follows:
Only a giant body larger than the moon could break the crust of the near side of the moon and reach the depth that causes the lava flows..
The missing crust of the near side of the moon
The result we have reached, indicates that the moon was exposed to a giant collision by one giant body at one time, which resulted in that giant body acquiring a crust from the near side of the moon. The reason for the existence of the lunar seas.This leads us to another result, which is that there is a missing crust from the near side of the moon, the acquired crust, which was the cause and geological consequence of the existence of the lunar seas. There must be a missing crust on the giant body, which is considered a trace and geological evidence of the occurrence of the giant collision, and at the same time this crust must match the geological and chemical properties of the near side of the moon.
Since the scientific result of the moon map theory indicates that there is a geological relationship between the Earth and the Moon, the cause of this relationship is a collision between the Earth and the Moon, which resulted in the Earth gaining a crust from the side near the Moon. This crust is the reason for the existence of the lunar seas and the continents of the Earth, and the lunar seas are a result of this collision and at the same time they are the geological form of the continents of the Earth.
Linking the result we have arrived at with the scientific result of the lunar map theory.
Based on the analysis and linking of the lunar geological data and the results we have arrived at with the scientific result of the lunar map theory, we find that in order for the result of the lunar map theory to become scientifically true, The following scientific evidence must be available.
1_Scientific geological and chemical evidence proves the existence of a difference in the properties between the continental crust and the ocean floor crust.
2_Scientific geological and chemical evidence proves the similarity in properties between the crust of continents and the near side of the moon.
In order to prove the validity of the lunar map theory and the scientific fact it revealed, and that the lunar seas are not the result of meteorites or asteroids, but rather the result of a great event that is considered the largest event in the solar system, we must show the scientific evidence. Which proves the existence of a difference in the geological and chemical properties between the continental crust and the ocean floor crust, as well as scientific evidence that proves the existence of a similarity in the geological and chemical properties between the continental crust and the moon.
1_ Scientific evidence that proves the existence of a difference in the geological and chemical properties between the continental crust and the ocean floor crust.
Among these evidences are agreed-upon scientific facts. These facts are considered scientific questions that confuse scientists without scientific solutions and answers to this day.
Which will be scientific evidence proving the validity of the moon map theory, and at the same time the moon map theory will be a scientific answer to those scientific questions.
We will mention them as follows:
1_The crust of the Earth's continents is older than the crust of the ocean floor.
2_The difference in geological and chemical properties between the continental crust and the ocean floor crust
3_The thickness of the crust of the Earth's continents is greater than the thickness of the crust of the ocean floor, and the percentage of increase in the thickness of the crust of the Earth's continents is equal to the percentage of decrease in the thickness of the crust of the near side of the Moon.
4_The density of the ocean floor crust is heavier than the density of the continental crust. The density of the ocean floor crust. 2.9 The density of the continental crust is 2.7
5_ There is a fundamental difference in the geophysical properties between the continental crust and the oceanic crust, and the continents and oceans cannot have the same structure.
2_Scientific evidence that proves the similarity in geological and chemical properties between the crust of continents and the moon
1_Similarity of volcanic rock crystallization and volcanic activity between the crust of continents and the crust of lunar seas
2_Matching oxygen isotopes between continental crust and moon
3_ The age of the continental crust matches the age of the moon.
4_The percentage of decrease in the thickness of the crust of the near side of the Moon is close to the percentage of increase in the thickness of the crust of the Earth's continents
These geological and chemical data, whether they show differences or similarities in geological and chemical properties, clearly indicate that the continental crust is not one of the basic components of the Earth and that there is a geological connection and relationship. Between the crust of the continents and the near side of the moon, specifically the lunar seas. I also want to point out that there is certainly other scientific data unknown to me that confirms the existence of a difference in properties between the crust of continents and the crust of oceans, or a similarity in properties between the crust of continents and the moon. Which may be known to any specialist in the field of earth sciences, planetary sciences and geological sciences.
Is there more accurate and clear scientific evidence that proves the validity of the moon map theory
Despite the results I have reached, which are based on scientific data and facts, there are still scientific questions that remain unsolved to this day, and despite the fact that these results are a scientific explanation and answer to these questions.
This scientific evidence is still not enough for the moon map theory to become a scientific fact. I consider the results I have reached to be scientific indicators, or we can call them a scientific window through which we can discover scientific geological evidence. More accurate and clear evidence that leaves no doubt about the truth of the moon map theory This is what happened, and through deep study and research in light of these results, I came to know the scientific evidence that cuts off all doubt with certainty. Because of the strength and clarity of this evidence, I considered these results to be merely initial indicators and evidence only.
I am just want to publish The theory with that evidence in a scientific journal specialized in the field of Earth, planetary and space sciences in general.
I hope that goodness and peace will
prevail over all the peoples of the earth
Adel Saleh Alabyadh
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram