From the abstract:
50Mya - the meteoroid ejected into space from Mars
1.4Gya - it was a rock on Mars, pertially melted
4.6 Gya - completely melted
The space.com article cites a more recent report,
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adf2906, 'Shock-recovered maskelynite indicates low-pressure ejection of shergottites from Mars', 03-May-2023. I did not find specific radiometric ages or exposure ages provided or any specific ejection times from Mars. The paper does briefly mention this, "In turn, a decrease in the estimate of shock pressure in the shergottites increases the rarity of ejection of unmelted rocks and increases the probability that the known shergottites were ejected by fewer impact events, given their narrow range of cosmic ray exposure ages (51)." The ref - 51R. [Wieler, L. Huber, H. Busemann, S. Seiler, I. Leya, C. Maden, J. Masarik, M. M. M. Meier, K. Nagao, R. Trappitsch, A. J. Irving, Noble gases in 18 martian meteorites and angrite Northwest Africa 7812—Exposure ages, trapped gases, and a re-evaluation of the evidence for solar cosmic ray-produced neon in shergottites and other achondrites. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 51, 407–428 (2016).]
The NorthWest Africa 7533 shows an exposure age of 5 Myr, not a 50 Myr ejected into space from Mars, ref -
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.12740
It seems very difficult to sort all of the different radiometric ages found (reported values) and the exposure ages (reported) for all the Martian meteorites. I note this from the paper about NorthWest Africa 7533. "(2) The lithification age is ~1.4 Ga. Yin et al. (2014) argued that some of the zircon analyses at the lower intercept were actually concordant grains that crystallized from melts at ~1.4 Ga. This led them to interpret the lithification age of the breccia as ~1.4 Ga. This model of the assembly time cannot explain the absence of zircons between 4.35–1.4 Ga, but is more permissive to sampling a very wide range of Martian history (~3 Ga), even if not recorded by zircon-forming events. Resolving these two models is essential to fully reading the record of ancient Mars from this breccia."
I find the various dating methods and reconciliation explanations - intriguing.