Theory of Four Dimensional Electromagnetic Universe.

[maglioned]

 

[promytius]

So, in all dimensions, only one radius.

 

[George²]

The universe is analog. Our attempts to describe it digitally will never lead to a complete understanding.

 

[Gibsense]

So, in all dimensions, only one radius.

Correct. The idea that you can attribute any particular 'up' radius , down ,sideways or 'x' radius as a unique orientation with specific attributes is, without some special characteristic, nonsense. However you could say that as the radii exist in 4D space new character will apply to all.
For example intersecting rings in 3D space may be difficult to separate (without destruction) but the same item in a 4D space has an extra dimension to enable easy separation.

 

[Gibsense]

I like the biologist's agreement with my ideas regarding expanding space, time and the hypersphere. His mathematics is good fun. It could be a breakthrough that gets Astronomers, Cosmologists and physicists thinking outside their boxes as opposed to endlessly exploring the corridors of existing shadows.

 

[Gibsense]

Despite my previous comments, one radius holds a unique quality when considered by an observer: the radius orthogonal to the observer's spatial position ), representing his time. Consequently, all radii at 90 degrees and the one at 180 degrees are special relative to that observer.

The radii at 90 degrees would encircle the n-sphere and appear to be at a position where t=0. Unless the hypersphere was sufficiently big for t=0 to occur earlier as a limit of the speed of light due to distance and expansion alone.

This scenario applies to any observer, regardless of their location on the 3D hypersphere. The radii are unique to each observer, reflecting a form of relativity.

 

[Atlan0001]

Despite my previous comments, one radius holds a unique quality when considered by an observer: the radius orthogonal to the observer's spatial position ), representing his time. Consequently, all radii at 90 degrees and the one at 180 degrees are special relative to that observer.

The radii at 90 degrees would encircle the n-sphere and appear to be at a position where t=0. Unless the hypersphere was sufficiently big for t=0 to occur earlier as a limit of the speed of light due to distance and expansion alone.

This scenario applies to any observer, regardless of their location on the 3D hypersphere. The radii are unique to each observer, reflecting a form of relativity.

I don't know if it's applicable to what you are getting at here, but....

Since heat effects quantum entanglement, what is their relationship in a Black Hole?

I have read comments on BHs being super-hot and super-cold. I'm curious about this interaction under all conditions, however the BH presents possibly the most extreme environment to analyze how temperatures effect entanglement, and what those consequences would be within the BH. I have no ideas...

forums.space.com

 

[Gibsense]

I don't know if it's applicable to what you are getting at here, but....

I must apologise as the description I made was inadequate and I should have checked the wording. "encircle" should he been "intersected" (clock handles at 9 o'clock)
The more important point is I can imagine I asked the Ai Grammarly to improve and did not check - a lesson there! Or maybe just me (?) Cannot blame a software.