This Giant Planet Shouldn’t Exist – But Astronomers Just Found It Around a Tiny Star. Why exactly?

[jhixon]

Scientists don't understand why a big planet is orbiting a small planet. When Newton wrote F=MA, his calculus actually takes the "mass" and "calculates the curve of an object or volume", so it's really Mass divided by Volume (or calculus) which is density. It's the density of an object that makes mass/volume. So in the case of the small planet, it has more mass than volume. The larger planet has more volume, but less mass. So the moral of the story is to use both mass/volume when calculating any object, or you will be like Einstein with half a formula E=MC2 and it should be E=M/VC2

 

[promytius]

Are there measurements to show your results? Say 1 microgram of an element is transformed into energy, in joules. Can that be accurately measured? If so, how can you obtain the same results by moving the speed of light to the denominator?

 

[jhixon]

Calculus is a branch of mathematics that deals with rates of change. It allows us to study how things change over time, find the rate of change of velocity, and "calculate area or volume". Clearly this definition of calculus shows that mass is divided by volume in the formula F=MA. You need both mass and volume for this formula to work outside of calculus. Since Einstein wasn't using calculus this should be written as F=M/VC2. I also suspect that if you corrected the mass defect problem in chemistry to M/V, you will find that this is correct to fixing mass defect, along with countless other formulas. Very sad that 377 years later, we still don't understand my cousins formula F=MA is really F=M/V*A