This New Monster Black Hole Discovery Is Too Big for Theories to Handle

[Truthseeker007]

We have only 10 years until it collapses our entire galaxy.

That would be interesting.lol! It would sure shut up the climate change alarmist.

 

[Truthseeker007]

Black Holes are simply a "theoryi" not a fact. You can not find, what does not exist. And in fact Black Holes are absurd, there is no other description.
Is it not true, that the known universal gravity force is what holds atoms together? That is well know garden variety "gravity" must be present or you don't have any physical objects. It is that simple.

And the theory has been around long enough, for them to have come up with something that takes it out of the absurd catagory.

But that's not necessary to them. Just keep saying you've found another one. and another one and another one. No, you just keep seeing the same data from long distances away, from which nothing can be established as being true, except the obvious. So what?. Here on earth, we have a zillion bits of data, that repeat themselves but we do not have a clue as to what they represent.

And now there is a steady stream of these maybes, whose sole purpose is to try and have research grants renewed ..... that have prove nothing but the data has repeated itself. But simply saying, renew our grant, we have found more instances of the same data?

But of course, you have not said anything you didn't say before then so why renew the grant? But they don't they say we have found another Black Hole, that is "we have learned something new. No .... you just repeated what we already know, the data exist.

And showing as real, artist's drawing of nothing we have never seen, but what he chooses to put on the canvas...... is an intentional deception.

Correct me if I am wrong but don't a star that dies and super nova's after awhile turn into a black hole?

 

[Truthseeker007]

Black Holes are simply a "theoryi" not a fact. You can not find, what does not exist. And in fact Black Holes are absurd, there is no other description.
Is it not true, that the known universal gravity force is what holds atoms together? That is well know garden variety "gravity" must be present or you don't have any physical objects. It is that simple.

And the theory has been around long enough, for them to have come up with something that takes it out of the absurd catagory.

But that's not necessary to them. Just keep saying you've found another one. and another one and another one. No, you just keep seeing the same data from long distances away, from which nothing can be established as being true, except the obvious. So what?. Here on earth, we have a zillion bits of data, that repeat themselves but we do not have a clue as to what they represent.

And now there is a steady stream of these maybes, whose sole purpose is to try and have research grants renewed ..... that have prove nothing but the data has repeated itself. But simply saying, renew our grant, we have found more instances of the same data?

But of course, you have not said anything you didn't say before then so why renew the grant? But they don't they say we have found another Black Hole, that is "we have learned something new. No .... you just repeated what we already know, the data exist.

And showing as real, artist's drawing of nothing we have never seen, but what he chooses to put on the canvas...... is an intentional deception.

On the contrary:

All Your Questions About the New Black Hole Image Answered

Yesterday, Earthlings first laid eyes on an actual image of a black hole — turning what lived only in our collective imaginations into concrete reality.

www.livescience.com

Yesterday, Earthlings first laid eyes on an actual image of a black hole — turning what lived only in our collective imaginations into concrete reality.

The image depicts an orange-toned lopsided ring circling the dark shadow of a black hole that gobbles up matter 55 million light-years away at the center of a galaxy known as Virgo A (Messier 87).

What is a black hole?

Black holes are extremely dense objects that nothing, not even light, can escape. As they eat nearby matter, they grow in size. Black holes usually form when a large star dies and collapses onto itself.

Supermassive black holes, which are millions or billions of times as massive as the sun, are thought to lie in the center of almost every galaxy, including our own. Our's is called Sagittarius A*.

 

[Dwight Huth]

With LB-1 being as massive as it is, you should probably be able to see it with a telescope. You would have to set your camera to a 1/3rd of a second shutter speed and ISO to 3200. Once captured you would have to analyze the UV artifacts, most likely in the far UV spectrum or nearly not seen at all for any signs of a collection of light around a large and darkened circle. Possibly with UV artifacts trailing into the center of the black hole at various angles.

I'm not certain but I think that I might have captured a black hole with my telescope. The image below was taken of Vega a few months ago through my 127 mm Star Max + LG7 ThinQ camera set to 1/3rd shutter speed and 3200 ISO. Yes it does look like a skull on a table with a clam shell behind it. But if you look close you can see that the top of the skull is being pulled into the center of the clam shell, which appears to have interactions suggesting that the edge of the clam shell itself could be the event horizon. If the light isn't being pulled into the black hole perhaps the object escaping is an X-ray that I caught on camera just as it passed through the dust disk that is thought to orbit Vega.

 

[JamesDeMeoPhD]

Given the position here, should astronomy still be teaching the geocentric universe because the scientific method, could not test and show the heliocentric solar system to be true?

There is nothing so simple or logical about "black holes" that would make them comparable to Copernican circles, doing away with the necessity for epicycles. So your comparison is basically one to insult the poster who declares an obvious point -- more in line with Copernicus than against -- which is to say that "black holes" remain invisible and unproven, and even the claims of a big one at M87 is shot through with contradictions, being heavily computer processed so as to appear something like what the EHT team expected it to look like. Remember it took around 100 years for the Copernican-Galilean world model of heliocentrism to be adopted, notably by Newton and Kepler, after which most of the natural philosophers of those days embraced it. Do you really think modern humans are immune from making similar magnificent errors as with the epicycles? Go read "The Dynamic Ether of Cosmic Space" for an education on what modern science has ignored and censored for political reasons, and which makes the concept of "black holes" unnecessary.

 

[75sinbad]

So from what I am reading it is true that this black hole will affect us in 10 years then or am I confused