Discover the strange world of rogue planets left to wander the cosmos untethered to any star.
What are rogue planets? : Read more
What are rogue planets? : Read more
A "gravitational collision", where the planets interact gravitationally without physically touching, could still disrupt Earth's orbit enough to destroy habitability.
If, in a million (or billion) years, we had the technology to maintain life on Earth without the Sun, why would we need to travel to a new star system?I have always felt that if humanity and life is to ever leave our sun, in a million years this is how it will travel to another star. Take the whole planet and all the life on it. Of course the tech in a million years most likely will allow us to do this. Much easier than a space ship. If it takes 3 million years to get to the next star system so be it.
Yes, and I vaguely recall reading about the limited effects that would come from an unwanted intruder passing through the Oort Cloud.I doubt that a planet the size of Earth going through the Oort Cloud would produce a "heavy bombardment". We would probably get some comets - over about a thousand years. But, not a calculation, just my SWAG.
Yes, their cross-sections are much smaller. Thus, if 20,000 Earth-sized objects were also Apollo objects, then missions to Mars becomes far more relevant.I agree that the likelihood of a rogue planet hitting us, or even getting close, seems really tiny.
Yes, but the point is to compare ~ 23,000 asteroids (Apollo & Aten) crossing Earth's orbit, as well as, staying within a few million miles of that orbit, with that of a few rogue planets many trillions of miles away from Earth's orbit.But, comparing it to the Apollo asteroids is not really similar enough. The Apollo asteroids are tiny in mass compared to something Earth's size or larger. If something even the mass of Mars came within the Moon's orbit, we would have a "gravitational collision" that would seriously affect Earth's future habitability due to orbit changes.
What a hoot! Thanks, that looks like fun, even with the Swiss cheese level of plot holes.
Yes. The newer and better IR survey scopes have the potential to find more rogues. But only the larger ones. So, perhaps there are IMFs (Initial Mass Functions) for planetary formation, which might produce the multiplier needed for each large rogue.At this point in our discovery process, I don't think we have a very good idea of how many of what size bodies are out there, untethered to another star. And, it is not clear that we know where the closest one is, now, or where that one is headed.
Perhaps we will get some better data soon, part of it in the search for "planet 9" of our own solar system. But, at this point, if we can't show that planet 9 doesn't exist, we also can't show that there isn't a rogue planet closing in on us at this very moment (if you assume a trillion miles out is "closing in" just because its trajectory will eventually get it here).