What is the wavelength of a 1 Hz photon ? The particle-wave non-sense

[Marvas]

Given that wavelength = speed of light / frequency, for a 'photon' of 1 Hz we get a wavelength of 300.000 Km. Yup, that is a 'quantum particle' right there ! The science of the very small.

Or of the very smallminded ??
Who on earth can imagine a particle being 300000 km long?

Oh no, its the great genius Einstein. Yes, that guy again ! (as his german fangirl would say in her relative punchline)

There's a reason why this guy again was kicked out of highschool. Not only he could not understand basic physics, like say refraction, but the sheer amount of brainfarts that he could release in curved spacetime was incompatible even with kindergarden level curriculum. In other words, he was 'special'. So he was sent to a special institution, where he formulated his special theory of relativity. Which was immediatelly approved by the special scientific community, because it made perfect non-sense.

P.S. No titans of science were harmed during the making of this thread. Because there are none in this thread. The thread is about what a titan of science, Tesla, reffered to as a 'fuzzy haired crackpot'. So rude, but so true.

 

[COLGeek]

You really don't like Albert Einstein, do you? You seem to go out of your way to discredit him and his works at every possible opportunity.

Why? Seems like a personal issue more than a science one.

 

[Marvas]

I don't like frauds in general (relativity), and this guy again is the biggest fraud in the history of modern science. I would have no problem with him if he was a fringe fuzzy haired crackpot smoking weed and fabulating about curved spacetime and particlewaves in his special institution. But instead he is considered as you say as a titan of science, on par with or above Newton, who's theory of gravity was replaced by Einstein's, or Maxwell, who's aether theory was replaced by einsteins photons, or Tesla. Who absolutelly rejected his titanic work.
And I see that you ignore my arguments which prove that he was a looney and that his theories were plain wrong. Or you wait until they gain traction so you can jump on the bandwagon when they do. That is a logical fallacy. Waiting for others to aprove that I disproved him, so that you can aprove me based on their aproval. But anyway it doesnt matter if you aprove me or not. You're just a moderator. And probably dont even understand anything related to the subject, other than Einstein is a titan of science which is the axiom of the century.

 

[COLGeek]

I don't like frauds in general (relativity), and this guy again is the biggest fraud in the history of modern science. I would have no problem with him if he was a fringe fuzzy haired crackpot smoking weed and fabulating about curved spacetime and particlewaves in his special institution. But instead he is considered as you say as a titan of science, on par with or above Newton, who's theory of gravity was replaced by Einstein's, or Maxwell, who's aether theory was replaced by einsteins photons, or Tesla. Who absolutelly rejected his titanic work.
And I see that you ignore my arguments which prove that he was a looney and that his theories were plain wrong. Or you wait until they gain traction so you can jump on the bandwagon when they do. That is a logical fallacy. Waiting for others to aprove that I disproved him, so that you can aprove me based on their aproval.

No, I think your arguments are weakened by your attacks on Einstein. Merit and points can be made without resorting to name calling and petty behavior.

I recommend you give it a try.

As is, no one will take you seriously.

 

[Marvas]

And how is my argument that a photon of 1 HZ is 300000 km long according to Einsteinian particle-wave physics weaked by this ? The only reason I attack Einstein is because this obvious enormity is his theory. If a professor calls a student stupid because he says stupid things, like say 1>2, or particles are bigger than the earth, that doesnt mean he is attacking the student. It means that the student is stupid. But in your view that would weaken the professor's arguments, and no one will take him seriously. And everyone will take the student seriously instead, and agree that 1>2, and that particles are bigger than the earth.

 

[COLGeek]

And how is my argument that a photon of 1 HZ is 300000 km long according to Einsteinian particle-wave physics weaked by this ? The only reason I attack Einstein is because this obvious enormity is his theory. If a professor calls a student stupid because he says stupid things, like say 1>2, or particles are bigger than the earth, that doesnt mean he is attacking the student. It means that the student is stupid. But in your view that would weaken the professor's arguments, and no one will take him seriously. And everyone will take the student seriously instead, and agree that 1>2, and that particles are bigger than the earth.

I don't think we are communicating effectively. In your example, call a student stupid is an insult. Telling the student he/she is mistaken and then explaining why is not. Which method will be better received by the student?

See (and understand) the difference?

 

[Marvas]

But calling someone stupid is not an insult. It's an informal noun. According to Oxford dictionary at least:

noun
INFORMAL

1. a stupid person (often used as a term of address).
   "you're not a coward, stupid!"

So in your opinion no one is ever stupid, only mistaken, and we should remove this word from the dictionary alltogether. Because it can only be used as an insult, not as it was intended- to call out stupid people when they are stupid. And those two stupid dogs were also insulted. Instead the author should have named them 'two mistaken dogs''.

But one is making a mistake, like drinking water from the sea, and one is drinking water from the toilet. First dog is mistaken cause he doesnt know sea water is salty, second dog is stupid cause he sees the water is yellow yet he still drinks it.

 

[COLGeek]

Carry on then, insulting and disrespecting others. Stupid, when used as you are using it, is derogatory.

Ignorant, as in meaning a lack of knowledge, is often misused in the very same way.

Whether you intend it or not, your points get lost by your method of casting doubt on the works of others. That weakens your argument.

Have a good day.

 

[Thermoman]

Given that wavelength = speed of light / frequency, for a 'photon' of 1 Hz we get a wavelength of 300.000 Km. Yup, that is a 'quantum particle' right there ! The science of the very small.

Or of the very smallminded ??
Who on earth can imagine a particle being 300000 km long?

Oh no, its the great genius Einstein. Yes, that guy again ! (as his german fangirl would say in her relative punchline)

There's a reason why this guy again was kicked out of highschool. Not only he could not understand basic physics, like say refraction, but the sheer amount of brainfarts that he could release in curved spacetime was incompatible even with kindergarden level curriculum. In other words, he was 'special'. So he was sent to a special institution, where he formulated his special theory of relativity. Which was immediatelly approved by the special scientific community, because it made perfect non-sense.

P.S. No titans of science were harmed during the making of this thread. Because there are none in this thread. The thread is about what a titan of science, Tesla, reffered to as a 'fuzzy haired crackpot'. So rude, but so true.

Given that wavelength = speed of light / frequency, for a 'photon' of 1 Hz we get a wavelength of 300.000 Km. Yup, that is a 'quantum particle' right there ! The science of the very small.

Or of the very smallminded ??
Who on earth can imagine a particle being 300000 km long?

Oh no, its the great genius Einstein. Yes, that guy again ! (as his german fangirl would say in her relative punchline)

There's a reason why this guy again was kicked out of highschool. Not only he could not understand basic physics, like say refraction, but the sheer amount of brainfarts that he could release in curved spacetime was incompatible even with kindergarden level curriculum. In other words, he was 'special'. So he was sent to a special institution, where he formulated his special theory of relativity. Which was immediatelly approved by the special scientific community, because it made perfect non-sense.

P.S. No titans of science were harmed during the making of this thread. Because there are none in this thread. The thread is about what a titan of science, Tesla, reffered to as a 'fuzzy haired crackpot'. So rude, but so true.

Well, Ok, Scientific genius enters the thread !

The frequency of a Photon is (1/299,792,458m)/1.s based on a linearity .

The frequency of Photons varies because of wave and troths passing the point at the same time . (none linear) .


Ok , I have no problem with you debating frequencies but to imply Einstein was useless is very incorrect of you . Although Einstein wasn't correct on every thing he said or wrote,he had some good thinking skills !

I can curve space-time so you need to think again !

 

[Classical Motion]

A photon is a separated EM field expansion at 2 X c. It has angular shape, but a linear incident function.

We only detect and observe the incident function. Of a shell expansion. And that energy is a lot more than the incident measurement. We see only a thin slice of the photon.

I manufactured 10 meter(30MHz) photons about fifty years ago. Today they have a 100 light year diameter. And they are still expanding at 2 X c. All EM emissions do this.

They form the largest structures in this cosmos. And start out as the smallest. We have detected some with a 13BLY radius. And I’m sure there are much larger.

The photon’s length and that length’s duration, are set and remain constant thru-out it’s flight. But the photon’s density is in a state of rarefying as it flies. It loses momentum with that loss in density. Because of the large angular spread. And the speed is conserved.

The loss of density comes from the spread/divergence of density. But it’s length and duration are eternal. A quantum characteristic.

The only thing that changes with emitter motion, is the length and duration BETWEEN photons.

The time between the blinks. Dead time modulation.

Not knowing this and believing that light is like a sound wave, let’s many to conclude an expanding space, an unbelievable expanding space.

And a total misunderstanding of light motion. AND the math of it.

 

[billslugg]

A photon can be as big as it wants to. Every photon is created when a point charge is moved from one location to another. It does not matter how small or how large that linear motion is or for how long it keeps moving. Only when it stops and then starts in the other direction can we determine what it's wavelength is. This could be sub-microscopic or as big as the universe. In order to interact with any photon, one needs an antenna of similar size. For the 1 Hz example, the antenna would need to be roughly 3E8 meters long.

 

[Classical Motion]

We have used length from the first because we can easily change and measure it.

Recently we have begun to use time, instead of length. Measure duration instead of length. I am referring to detection, not emission.

Think of period detection. This has advantages, but also disadvantages.

It’s like switching the antenna, detector, on and off at the period of interest. A time filter.

Time instead of length. But one needs to slice that period 4 times.

So the detection switching speed needs 4 times the wanted period rate.

For a working radio example, check out Tayloe mixers.

And as for emitting, methods of medium and low frequencies, useful for inter earth links, thru mountains and such, which use to require very large antennas, can be done with small piezo antennas. Which is more or less a crystal.

An isotropic radio source, if you can believe that. Low F at that.

Future measurements and knowledge will depend on the switching rates we can do.

Lot’s of exciting future for electronics. With these new quantum transducers.

A visual of a flux field might be possible.