S
skywalker01
Guest
According to my records there were two flights of the X-15A-2 with a full ablative coating.<br /><br />The coating developed by Martin Marietta (called M-25S) consisted of a resin base, a catalyst, and glass bead powder (sounds like hi-temp epoxy with microballoons doesn't it).<br /><br />It took approx. 700 manhours to refurbish the ablative coating after the first flight in preparation for the second.<br /><br />The damage to the aircraft that occured on the second flight had to do with higher than predicted temperatures around the dummy ramjet that was mounted on the tail of the vehicle.<br /><br />The first flight with the full ablative coating (flight #175, 11-18-66) had a top speed of Mach 6.33 (4,250 MPH).<br /><br />The second flight with full ablative coating (flight #188, 10-3-67) had a top speed of Mach 6.70 (4,520 MPH).<br />The second flight charred and pitted the ablative coating so badly that refurbishment of the coating was not worthwhile, as a result, a completely new coating would have been required for the next flight (this vehicle was retired after this flight due to the damage caused by the dummy ramjet).<br /><br />Just an off-the-wall thought.<br />I wonder if this spray-on ablator would work better that the foam on the ET? Either as a top coat for the foam, or as a complete replacement, or only as a local top coat for sensitive areas?