Why are you still making rockets that go straight up?

[Duothedouble]

Why have you not tried to make a maglev catapult to launch the rockets into orbit? i mean yes make them able to ignite while vertical while upon exit but i feel like using a maglev system to launch the rocket at high speed (ramp up) and then ignite would be 100 times more effective.. Just wondering why you haven't taken this approach?

 

[Catastrophe]

" Just wondering why you haven't taken this approach?"

Because I have not felt the need to launch any rockets lately.

Cat

 

[Helio]

It seems to me that a mag. drive would be "too much squeeze for the juice".

A 3g mag system, for instance, and a mile of track would only get you 4% of orbital speed.

You can get the results using those basic equations of:

v = at = gt [velocity at end of track]
s = (gt^2)/2 [track length]

Higher g forces will improve speeds but come with higher risk factors.

If only solid mass needs to be launched, it may be beneficial, but may not.

 

[Particle Article]

this thread is similar to your proposition==>
(21) Question - Many alternate forms of space propulsion are currently being investigated why not this one? | Space.com Forums
--& this one too ==>
(21) MagLev Rail Launch Assist | Space.com Forums

might be interesting @Duothedouble

 

[Catastrophe]

Why are you still making rockets that go straight up?

Because the shortest distance between here and there is straight up.

Any angle will incur more friction with atmosphere.

Cat