Why do photons disappear going through a semi-conductor, conductor etc.?

[jhixon]

Electrons give off photons, but when do they do this? Photons are given off when the "charge of the electron is different than the current electromagnetic field", and thus photons are given off. As electrons travel to the first stage of the semi-conductor, the electromagnetic field is present and different in charge so photons are given off. As it goes to the second level or middle of the conductor, the field is reduced by the plates and thus there is not enough of a "charge difference" in the field, so no photon is given off. As it progresses to the third plate, the field is now present again at it's strength and a photon is given off. This is why you see the photon until it passes through the middle of the semi-conductor etc., and then it disappears, and then reemerges in the last plate as the field is present again. Looking forward to someone measuring this, as this is how photons work in fields. Why do photons keep being given off and how do electrons keep doing this process? Space is charged by the electromagnetic force/field, so as the electron travels it gains electrical energy so it can keep giving off photons when the "change in charges is present". Electrons, all three types are a fundamental energy carriers and do not decay, as well as positive energy/matter consists of protons and neutrons that's also a fundamental force and do not decay. Yes conversions of a neutron to a proton can take place in certain instances, however it's not caused by decay itself.

 

[billslugg]

"charge of the electron is different than the current electromagnetic field",
This is false.
An EM fiels is created any time a charge moves relative to the observer.
Any time an electron drops a level in an atomic shell, it will also give off a photon.
Any charge moving through an existing EM field will be deviated.

 

[jhixon]

Physics processes determines how electrons and particles behave in an electromagnetic field, and this field or the behavior of electrons/particles has nothing to do with an observer. The same process happens whether it's observed or not, so an observer is not relevant unless you want to talk about who is seeing the photons which doesn't matter. Every particle/matter has a nuclear strong force, weak force and electromagnetic force and it's these forces that determine the field, and how particles behave. Just like a neutrino behaves differently than a neutron does. A neutrino can pass through regular matter of similar composition and a neutron can not. This is determined by the field and not the observer. Yes a neutron can drop a shell to become a proton because the process says it can convert to make a proton since none is available, this is also not decay. Yes a charge can be deviated by gravitational waves, strength of field etc. Yes a charge of an electron is the same as the field when it picks up energy, however photons are given off when there is a "change in charges between the electron and a field", just like lightning is a different charge than the atmosphere, photons are given off when the bolt comes down. This is a real world example of this process happening with photons and a different charge. Did you ever see photons when lightning comes down?

 

[billslugg]

When an observer and a charged particle are at rest relative to each other, the observer cannot detect a magnetic field around the charged particle, only an electric field. Lentz's law says a moving charge creates a magnetic field.

 

[Classical Motion]

I’m convinced emission is a snap, a discharge that happens at a 2 times c rate. I call it an instant dynamic. A chunk, a volume of field, is cut and separated from the source. With a c velocity.

Like spinning spokes released from a hub. The spokes are already at c, emission just changes the direction. This cut field has no inertia and an instant change in direction is the result.

That’s why the velocity of the source is never imprinted on the emission. The velocity of the source and the velocity of the emission…… never had any common time. Or common motion.

One might think of it this way, the source is moving….. but at the instant of emission…… it is like the source is standing still…… during the emission. A freeze frame. A two times c rate.

Of course the source does not do this, but the effect is like it does. It’s that quick.

If we exclude stars, most emissions here on earth are singular emissions. An emission is a single chunk of field. Usually with our earth matter, one emission is all that is needed for stability. We never notice this. It is going on, all around us, all the time. Especially in our bodies. Living bodies.

Heat, fiction, chemistry and other motion(radio)…. Can continuously recharge these emitters and we can get DUTY CYCLES of repeated discreet emissions.

Instant chunk emission and duty cycle propagation result in a constant velocity to all observers. With empty space, and cosmic pillars of length and time.

Simple moving vector interactive mechanics. And a duty cycle shift.

A classical explanation.

The magnetic dipole that comes with every charge, is what keeps the charge from dissolving into space. It holds the charge together. A charge is always in the process of exploding, and the M field holds that process to a certain containment. An energy level of containment.

And why emission is necessary to stay together. As a particle.

The E is expanding, the M is contracting. It’s a rotational containment balance.

Another classical explanation.

 

[jhixon]

When an observer and a charged particle are at rest relative to each other, the observer cannot detect a magnetic field around the charged particle, only an electric field. Lentz's law says a moving charge creates a magnetic field.

So if an observer isn't there, what changes exactly? The charged particle is still going to have motion based on the field whether you can see the field or not. Just like lightning strikes and nobody see it. It still happens from a change in charges. Clearly the lightning is a much stronger charge than the electromagnetic field, and thus gives off photons.
The Lorentz force is the combined effect of electric and magnetic forces acting on a charged particle moving through an electromagnetic field. It is mathematically expressed as F = qE + qv × B, where F is the Lorentz force, q is the charge, E is the electric field, v is the velocity of the particle, and B is the magnetic field. This force is fundamental in electromagnetism and describes how charged particles are influenced by electric and magnetic fields. I don't see an observer in this calculation?