Apollo Moon Hoax

[onesmallstep]

Yeah...and don't forget that guy Edmund Hillary. What he actually climbed was Magic Mountain at Disney Land.<br /><br />And everybody knows Charles Lindberg just flew around in circles and finally landed in New Jersey.<br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[dragon04]

<font color="yellow">i give this post 2 days before the moderators start to cry and delete any knowledge of this post....</font><br /><br />Now come on. You have to <b>know</b> they are going to leave your post in the thread simply because removing it would verify your acute insight into the whole Conspiracy Issue.<br /><br />They're clever like that.<br /><br /><br />ATTICA! ATTICA! <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <em>"2012.. Year of the Dragon!! Get on the Dragon Wagon!".</em> </div>

 

[dragon04]

<font color="yellow">Yeah... sort of like the Bat Signal.</font><br /><br />Correction. That would be the MoonBat Signal. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <em>"2012.. Year of the Dragon!! Get on the Dragon Wagon!".</em> </div>

 

[qso1]

Kerberus:<br />How could there be Moon landings? It has already been conclusively proven that the Moon is only a projection beamed up from the Nevada desert.<br /><br />Me:<br />Oh thats right, how could I have forgotten, silly me.<br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong>My borrowed quote for the time being:</strong></p><p><em>There are three kinds of people in life. Those who make it happen, those who watch it happen...and those who do not know what happened.</em></p> </div>

 

[qso1]

zarniwoop:<br />you guys no nothing.....excuses ...excuses......ask NASA about project naomi....mmmmmm men in black,scuttling about everywhere if knowledge of this ever got out.<br /><br />Me:<br />So lemme get this straight. The moon landing was a conspiracy but all we have to do is ask NASA about project Naomi and they will simply tell us about it? A project I'm assuming to be top secret? <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong>My borrowed quote for the time being:</strong></p><p><em>There are three kinds of people in life. Those who make it happen, those who watch it happen...and those who do not know what happened.</em></p> </div>

 

[onesmallstep]

zarniwoop,<br /><br />If I could be serious for a moment, I would like to ask why you don't believe the moon landings took place.<br /><br />Are you old enough to remember when they actually occurred?...or are they some long ago events that you have only heard about through second hand historical accounts?<br /><br />Does landing on the moon seem like such a fantastic event that it would be impossible to achieve, especially in light of the fact we have not been back since? I guess I could understand that logic. If I were under say 36 years old and did not see it happen for myself, my biggest question would be, "Okay, so if we can land a man on the moon, why can't we land a man on the moon?"<br /><br />You would think we would have been back in the past 36 years since the last man left, and to tell you the truth, the fact that we haven't been back mystifies me somewhat.<br /><br />At the height of America's most stunning achievement to have just quit the way we did is rather astonishing...and will probably go down in history as one of this country's biggest blunders.<br /><br />But in spite of all that, I know it did happen...Six times plus one that failed. I was there, I saw it. And I know that Stephen Spielberg, George Lucas, and Stanley Kubrick combined could not have concocted any simulation that could match it.<br /><br />It was the real McCoy, no doubt about it.<br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[billslugg]

onesmallstep<br /><br />You are jumping the gun. We must start with the basics. We must establish a foundation for the question "Did we go to the moon?" Watch me closely.<br /><br />zarniwoop<br />Hello? Hello? zarniwoop - do you believe that the moon exists? <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p> </p> </div>

 

[lsbd]

at the risk of sounding rude: are you freaking serious???<br /><br />be careful...don't get to close to the edge of the world...you might fall off.

 

[onesmallstep]

<font color="yellow">"its great being a loony"</font><br /><br />So you admit to being a loony huh?...Therefore, none of what you are saying should be taken seriously. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[onesmallstep]

Hey...I just became an asteroid, I thought it was cooler being a comet<img src="/images/icons/frown.gif" /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[cometvomit]

Sorry, I came in late, but it is because of the lack of technology at the time? Or is it just another wild conspiracy? <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[lampblack]

OK, I bit... if ya google Project Naomi, you get links to a project by that name for high-risk pregnant women -- and to a 1992 movie entitled "Danger Island."<br /><br />The movie apparently has a plot involving men in black and CIA guys chasing aliens around (or something like that). Pretty thrilling stuff. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font color="#0000ff"><strong>Just tell the truth and let the chips fall...</strong></font> </div>

 

[a_lost_packet_]

<font color="yellow">lampblack - high-risk pregnant women</font><br /><br />...<br /><br />... .. .<br /><br />WTF is a "high-risk" pregnant woman?<br /><br />I read the skimmed through the blurb on it and still can't figure out where "high-risk" comes into play. Sure, I can figure out how certain women could be at "high-risk" for a pregnancy. Roseanne Barr probably wouldn't be in that category...<br /><br />Hmm.. "Danger Island" huh?<br /><br />WOOWOO! GO GO GO BANANA SPLITS !! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-ywc503A_Y<br /><br />I loved that show! <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" /><br /><br />I'll pass on the remake. Everyone knows the "Banana Splits" were aliens. <img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" /><br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="1">I put on my robe and wizard hat...</font> </div>

 

[qso1]

onesmallstep:<br />"Okay, so if we can land a man on the moon, why can't we land a man on the moon?"<br /><br />Me:<br />I like that line. I have often told people that if we were to decide to return to the moon, we'd need 6 to 8 years minimum to get the first mission underway. Why? No hardware for one thing. Now with the Constellation program underway, flight hardware will be available soon assuming the program isn't axed.<br /><br />onesmallstep:<br />You would think we would have been back in the past 36 years since the last man left, and to tell you the truth, the fact that we haven't been back mystifies me somewhat.<br /><br />Me:<br />Its not all that mysterious...no bucks, no Buck Rogers. NASAs budget during Apollo was around 2-4% GDP. Today its .6% GDP. Lack of public interest killed off Apollo. Nixon approved only the shuttle in 1972 which killed off other proposals (Lunar base, mars mission, nuclear shuttles etc.)<br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong>My borrowed quote for the time being:</strong></p><p><em>There are three kinds of people in life. Those who make it happen, those who watch it happen...and those who do not know what happened.</em></p> </div>

 

[qso1]

zarniwoop:<br />mmmm you can ask them but you wont get an answer only a visit from the men in black....why do i know about project naomi.......do a search on it ....i worked on it......but it goes much further than what you read....ok nuff said.<br /><br />Me:<br />Looks like I was beaten to the punch and so far. Naomi is apparently a movie about the stuff you refer to. You and I debated this lunar hoax stuff some time back. I was 13 when they landed on the moon. I have closely followed human spaceflight since and nothing the hoax believers have come up with so far convinces me we didn't go.<br /><br />So I guess its a matter of, you have your opinion, and I got mine. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong>My borrowed quote for the time being:</strong></p><p><em>There are three kinds of people in life. Those who make it happen, those who watch it happen...and those who do not know what happened.</em></p> </div>

 

[Swampcat]

<font color="yellow">"So I guess its a matter of, you have your opinion, and I got mine."</font><br /><br />The difference is that the facts back up <i>your</i> opinion. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="3" color="#ff9900"><p><font size="1" color="#993300"><strong><em>------------------------------------------------------------------- </em></strong></font></p><p><font size="1" color="#993300"><strong><em>"I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical. Unsuccessful rebellions, indeed, generally establish the encroachments on the rights of the people which have produced them. An observation of this truth should render honest republican governors so mild in their punishment of rebellions as not to discourage them too much. It is a medicine necessary for the sound health of government."</em></strong></font></p><p><font size="1" color="#993300"><strong>Thomas Jefferson</strong></font></p></font> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

Do you posess the ability to speak in coherent sentances, or have you lost that by indiscriminate use of the Impobability Drive? <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[larper]

I think Project Naomi had something to do with the removal of knowledge of proper capitalization and punctuation from the cerebral cortex.<br /><br />As a side effect, it also removed terms that were similar:<br /><br />Apostrophy - Apollo<br />Comma - coma<br /><br />etc. So as a result, it lends the brain being very susceptible to conspiracy theories.<br /><br />In this strange case, the only term that seems to have survived the procedure is "ellipsis". Thus the observed penchant for arguing in circles. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong><font color="#ff0000">Vote </font><font color="#3366ff">Libertarian</font></strong></p> </div>

 

[lsbd]

<font color="yellow">and i bet you still wet the bed</font><br /><br />ROFLMMFAO<br /><br /><br />when your arguement is lame...the best defense is a good old fashioned personal attack or ad hominem. <img src="/images/icons/laugh.gif" />

 

[MeteorWayne]

The lack of an ability to speak in coherent sentences is a fault, especially since you do speak English. Not an egregious one, but it indicates intent to me. <br />It indicates a troll like desire to refuse to engage in serious discussion, from what I see.<br /><br />I was never, nor would I ever be a bully. In fact I was bullied, so am extremely sensitive to that. I am no longer bullied.<br /><br />I respect all life, so would never torture any creature.<br /><br />My mind is not closed, your spacy statements don't give us much to assess. That was the reason for my hoping you would speak in coherent sentences. To much to ask, it appears.<br /><br />As far as wetting the bed, I don't, it has nothing to do with the discussion, and is a clear ad homenim, having nothing to do with the subject of the thread.<br /><br />It would be petty of me to bring that to the attention of the moderators, so I won't do it.<br /><br />But be on alert that you now have violated the rules, so could be banned in an incoherent instant <img src="/images/icons/laugh.gif" /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[larper]

I think only Arthur Dent can ban him. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong><font color="#ff0000">Vote </font><font color="#3366ff">Libertarian</font></strong></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

Or...<br /><br />THE VOGONS!!!!<br /><br />{cringe, with thumb out and towel in hand.} <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

Sorry, you are wrong.<br /><br />If you want to have a discussion, you must discuss.<br /><br />Babble is not conducive to a useful discussion.<br /><br />If you are just ging to prattle on without any meaning, well go ahead, but don't expect any intelligent responses, since you give no intelligent input. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

However, it is only Phenomena, where such prattle is tolerated, yea even appreciated <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

Well, here's your first post in this thread:<br /><br />"heheheh thought i'd gone huh....mmmmmm mention the moon landings and im here....one sure way to get this post deleted......tell the truth about the moon landings.....it didnt happen ok.......end of story.....i give this post 2 days before the moderators start to cry and delete any knowledge of this post....like so many times before.....boohoo time to throw your teddys in the corner. "<br /><br />Please demonstrate any serious attempt to discuss the issue, whatever you think it is.<br /><br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>