L
lampblack
Guest
Lordy, the Apollo moon hoax people have always struck me as being a bit odd.<br /><br />The initial launch of the Saturn V rockets were viewed by thousands of people on site -- and by millions more on television. So, countless witnesses verify that those big-ass rockets sent <i>something</i> into space.<br /><br />The engineering tests of the lunar lander and the third-stage rocket that had to fire for insertion into lunar trajectory -- all witnessed by scores of people, and thoroughly documented. They verified that the equipment actually worked as advertised. Given the fact that it worked, what would be the point in using it for fakery?<br /><br />The landings of the Apollo capsules in the Pacific Ocean were witnessed by scores of people onboard the Navy vessels in the recovery fleet. Witnesses included numerous members of the news media. Thus, the hoax-mongers are proposing that the U.S. government went to the trouble of shooting the Apollo capsules into space -- and that the astronauts sat in low earth orbit while NASA faked the moon landings.<br /><br />While on the moon, the astronauts during four of the missions set up reflective mirrors that remain there to this day. Even now, astronomers are bouncing lasers off the things, accurately measuring the distance between the earth and moon. Here is a relevant link. How might they have gotten there -- if astronauts didn't put them there?<br /><br />Photographic evidence exists of the astronauts placing these "lunar retroreflectors" on the surface. The fact that land-based lasers can still get a reflection back provides empirical evidence that they are still there.<br /><br />It'd be easy to continue on this way for pages. If this were a criminal trial and NASA stood indicted on the charge of having actually sent men to the moon, there would be no option really but to convict. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font color="#0000ff"><strong>Just tell the truth and let the chips fall...</strong></font> </div>