S
Smersh
Guest
First of all, here's a story in the Daily Telegraph:
Full story here.
Here's a link to the scientific paper itself, from the scientists mentioned in the Daily Telegraph article (it can be downloaded in various format's including pdf.) A summary of the paper is shown at the link as well.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.2991
Is there any chance this paper will survive the peer review process, does anyone think?
Could the Large Hadron Collider be held back by its own future?
The much-delayed and maligned Large Hadron Collider has been hit by its most outlandish claim to date - it is being sabotaged by its own future.
Forget the far-fetched belief that it will create a black hole, two distinguished physicists have gone even further claiming nature itself is stopping the troubled £4.4billion project from getting off the ground.
In a theory reminiscent of the time travelling film Back to the Future, the theoretical physicists Holger Nielsen, from Denmark, and Masao Ninomiya, from Japan, have concluded that its discoveries could be so "abhorrent to nature" that they are coming back to stop their own creation ...
Full story here.
Here's a link to the scientific paper itself, from the scientists mentioned in the Daily Telegraph article (it can be downloaded in various format's including pdf.) A summary of the paper is shown at the link as well.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.2991
Is there any chance this paper will survive the peer review process, does anyone think?