"David Blaine The Magician Revealed" on Google Video

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

dgm1

Guest
Kmars position on this, and all para-normal topics, is a sort of "primitive peoples and the comet" stance. <br /> Since he can't explain it it has to be a real mystical occurance. Probably dances around the fire and prays to the Gods of Funky Camera Angles when Blaine is on TV. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
K

kmarinas86

Guest
EXHIBIT A<br /><br /><font color="yellow">Since he can't explain it it has to be a real mystical occurance.</font>= Delusional Statement<br /><br />EXHIBIT B<br /><br /><font color="yellow">Probably dances around the fire and prays to the Gods of Funky Camera Angles when Blaine is on TV.</font>= Another, highly unsuprising, delusional statement<br /><br />You sound like a psychic who thinks he can observe me from a distance, telepathically or something.<br /><br />Sure dude. RIGHT.
 
D

dgm1

Guest
Telepathically? No not telepathically...electronically. You see genuis, I can observe you in all your gullible splendor right here on my monitor. You are the one making the spectacle of yourself with all of your kook theories and raelian BS...we are just the witnesses. <br /> <br /> And you calling some one else delusional has got to be one of the all time comical moments on SDC. You have turned out to be one of the most delusional people on the whole forum...and looking around the place that is saying something. At the rate you are going you will make Hoagland look like a highly respected MIT professor in a few years.<br /> Now go back to sleep and dream about crop circles, raelian fembots, magicians and alien-beckoning flake prophets. We need some more of your "top notch" research on here. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
K

kmarinas86

Guest
<font color="yellow">At the rate you are going you will make Hoagland look like a highly respected MIT professor in a few years.</font><br /><br />False prophet <img src="/images/icons/tongue.gif" />
 
K

kmarinas86

Guest
<font color="yellow">Note that the camera position is coincidently right above a spectators head, partially concealing his right hand.</font><br /><br />Partially ain't enough! There's gotta be post editing.
 
Z

zavvy

Guest
I can't get your video to run...<br /><br />What's it about?
 
D

dgm1

Guest
False prophet. Ha! That is another good one kmar. The one thing you are not capable of recognizing is a false prophet (i.e. yaweh, Rael and etc).<br /> So let's recount so far; <br /> 1)We have the most delusional member of SDC calling others delusional.<br /> 2) We have the follower of multiple false prophets trying to insult others by calling some one a false prophet.<br /><br /><br />LOL! Am I missing anything here? Keep going kmar, this is funny stuff. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
K

kmarinas86

Guest
<font color="yellow">lol and why do you suspect this? You don't believe a card can flip faster than the films frames?</font><br /><br />Wrong.<br /><br />I do believe a card can flip faster than the film's frames. Why not? Also, the visible flips in the video involve more than one frame. The problem for David Blaine is to put one card under another. He uses one of his fingers which swaps the card (double card pick up). Another problem is the card he puts into the hand of the spectator. Flipping does not "automatically" do that. The video highlights this (the trick with the old lady) - a replay is used.<br /><br /><font color="yellow">If you have a deck of cards, take 2 of them together and flip it slowly, note the different angles. This is very clear within the card trick. One of the things that went right past your head.</font><br /><br />You're wrong. I saw it, and so did you. First of all, I slowed down the video myself (as recorded in the video) so infact I did see every flip that you could have possibily seen in the video. I saw the three of diamonds and the four of clubs swapped in this manner. That's why I used a slow motion "pre"play. I played this many times, and you are assuming something you cannot prove (or know). But of course, both you and I CANNOT see flips that are faster than the 24 fps of the video I downloaded.<br /><br />I haven't stated my position either. Both you and DGM are assuming my position from previous posts I made. The only thing that hints at me believing this in the video is the text I put at the end of the video. That does not necessarily reflect my current opinion.
 
K

kmarinas86

Guest
<font color="yellow">1)We have the most delusional member of SDC calling others delusional.</font><br /><br />The above is another delusional statement, because you misinterpreted. I said your statement was delusional hence the phrase "delusional statement". I said the phrase "false prophet" and you automatically (and erroneously) assumed what it meant. In fact, I was just saying that to refer to the "delusional statement". I didn't say (call out) "DGM is a false prophet". That statement would be delusional in itself.<br /><br /><font color="yellow">At the rate you are going you will make Hoagland look like a highly respected MIT professor in a few years.</font><br /><br />Oh yes, a statement without any real scientific proof whatsoever.<br /><br />Lying doesn't automatically give you the name "false prophet" because the term means more than that.
 
K

kmarinas86

Guest
That's exactly the kind of intelligent response that was called for, thanks for debunking! <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" />
 
D

dgm1

Guest
Oh man, this is getting better. You just trumped your previous comical statements by using your "delusion" to explain the words "false Prophet."<br /><br /> If you keep this up you will have a whole stand up act to work with. Please, no more kmar. I am starting to laugh out loud in the office. They are used to me talking to myself but the laughing makes them nervous. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts