<font color="yellow">lol and why do you suspect this? You don't believe a card can flip faster than the films frames?</font><br /><br />Wrong.<br /><br />I do believe a card can flip faster than the film's frames. Why not? Also, the visible flips in the video involve more than one frame. The problem for David Blaine is to put one card under another. He uses one of his fingers which swaps the card (double card pick up). Another problem is the card he puts into the hand of the spectator. Flipping does not "automatically" do that. The video highlights this (the trick with the old lady) - a replay is used.<br /><br /><font color="yellow">If you have a deck of cards, take 2 of them together and flip it slowly, note the different angles. This is very clear within the card trick. One of the things that went right past your head.</font><br /><br />You're wrong. I saw it, and so did you. First of all, I slowed down the video myself (as recorded in the video) so infact I did see every flip that you could have possibily seen in the video. I saw the three of diamonds and the four of clubs swapped in this manner. That's why I used a slow motion "pre"play. I played this many times, and you are assuming something you cannot prove (or know). But of course, both you and I CANNOT see flips that are faster than the 24 fps of the video I downloaded.<br /><br />I haven't stated my position either. Both you and DGM are assuming my position from previous posts I made. The only thing that hints at me believing this in the video is the text I put at the end of the video. That does not necessarily reflect my current opinion.