Deep Impact Hoax - 2

[bigbrain]

Hey, Nasa buffoons fan,<br />you are very humourist but<br /><br />explain me how you can use stars as reference to move in 3D space.

 

[votefornimitz]

Yes, all of you out there, go to paint, fill in with black, fill it up with stars, and then put a very dark-grey dot 1x1 pixels.... wait a week, and the point at the dot withind 2 minutes. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <span style="color:#993366">In the event of a full scale nuclear war or NEO impact event, there are two categories of underground shelters available to the public, distinguished by depth underground: bunkers and graves...</span> </div>

 

[lunatio_gordin]

two minutes is more than enough time.<br />please stop responding to him guys. i think the time for this over...

 

[eosophobiac]

I'm starting to think that "Vote" character and BB are one and the same. (And the eighth grade-level education, I believe.) Those last few posts make NO sense! <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p> </p> </div>

 

[telfrow]

<font color="yellow">Please stop responding to him guys. I think the time for this over...</font><br /><br />Seconded. <br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <strong><font color="#3366ff">Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will to strive, to seek, to find and not to yeild.</font> - <font color="#3366ff"><em>Tennyson</em></font></strong> </div>

 

[darepairman]

Thirded <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" /> let this chump sink, I cant believe he is serious, I also think he is a schmuck with nothing better to do, but if not ? just plain scary. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[bigbrain]

"Yeah, they both think they have "fans", both have undeservedly large egos, both have equally misguided opinions. BB is calmer and slightly more dignified in his dementia, though, while Nimitz acts like the grade-schooler he is, so maybe not!" <br /><br />In front of evidence you can only be silent and offend.<br /><br />It is enormously difficult to oppose to evidence.<br /><br />Try to say something intelligent if you can.

 

[bigbrain]

My dear fans,<br /><br />go again here:<br /> <br />http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/deepimpact/multimedia/0701-ge.html <br />(Right click on "View related animation" <br />Left click on "Save object by name") <br /><br />Since eccentricity of the earth is 0.0167, the terrestrial orbit is practically a circumference.<br /><br />Nasa uncapable artist (artist?) can not even draw a circumference with the sun in the centre.<br /><br />Nasa buffoons do not even care to do things scrupulously, hey they work at NASA ok? They do not waste their time in ridiculous matter.<br /><br />Circumferences, ellipses, what do you want they are? They are almost the same ok?<br /><br /><br /><br />

 

[dragon04]

"Nasa uncapable artist (artist?) can not even draw a circumference with the sun in the centre."<br /><br />It's not a circumference. and the sun isn't in the center. Again, as I have before, I refer you to Kepler and the foci of an elliptical orbit around the sun.<br /><br />"Circumferences, ellipses, what do you want they are? They are almost the same ok?"<br /><br />And your 5/8" inside diameter lug nuts are almost the same size as ones that are 11/16". Use the bigger ones on your car and your tires will fall off.<br /><br />I'll grant you this. If NASA used your logic to do their calculations, they WOULD be buffoons. And they'd be wasting my tax dollars.<br /><br />Fortunately, they have PH.D's and don'r round off ellipses to the nearest circle.<br /><br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <em>"2012.. Year of the Dragon!! Get on the Dragon Wagon!".</em> </div>

 

[bigbrain]

"It's not a circumference. and the sun isn't in the center. Again, as I have before, I refer you to Kepler and the foci of an elliptical orbit around the sun". <br /><br />Since eccentricity of the earth is 0.016 in the drawing scale the ellipse is a circumference and the sun should be in the centre.<br /><br />"Circumferences, ellipses, what do you want they are? They are almost the same ok?" <br /><br />Nasa buffoons have drawn an ellipse instead of a circumference and the sun is not even in the focus.<br /><br />You have only to learn reading me.<br /><br />

 

[thermionic]

<br />That's really interesting! Thanks, Mr. BigB, for teaching us all this stuff. I wonder how NASA will talk their way out of this once people find out they can't even draw circles right.<br /><br />Another thing that really bugs me is this Pi business. They claim it has all those extra numbers just so they can seem smart, I'll bet. Pi should be 3. Afer all, 3 is almost the same as 3.1415926... so what's the big deal? Then it would be easy to figure out orbits, and we could all be rocket scientists!

 

[bigbrain]

Let me know more about this Pi, please.

 

[kmarinas86]

The number Pi is determined using an infinite series.<br /><br />But it's not like you're going to believe that. If you're going to invent a new number why not give it a name <img src="/images/icons/tongue.gif" />

 

[thermionic]

They claim to use Pi to steer their supposed rockets. They do it like this:<br /><br />Suppose the earth is a billion miles from the sun. Then using the number Pi, you can tell that the earth travels exactly 3 billion miles as it rolls all the way around the sun. So get a piece of paper, and draw the sun in the middle. Then draw a circle with the sun in its center. Pretend the distance from the sun to the circle is a billion miles, and you've got a picture of the solar system. Now you can figure out where the earth will be at any time with a piece of string. Measure a piece of string to be the same length as the circle. Fold the string in half, lay it along the circle, and that's where the earth will be in half a year.<br /><br />So all you need to steer rockets is string and paper and beer. But Nasa wants it to seem really complicated so only they get to be rocket scientists. Otherwise we'd all fly out to the moon ourselves and see that there isn't an American flag there like they pretend.

 

[thermionic]

<br />That's right, so you agree with me, kmarinas86! They had to invent this crazy number and give it a fancy name, when they could have used a perfectly good number that's easy to remember. But nooo, 3 isn't good enough for the rocket scientists, they need their high falutin' Pi. Sheesh...

 

[petepan]

<br /><br />Yup, shoulda just stuck with 3, like why go to all this trouble eh?<br /><br />http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4644103.stm<br /><br />So far, pi has been calculated to 1.24 trillion decimal places with the aid of a supercomputer. <br /><br />Conventionally, 3.14159 is used as pi. <br /><br />Pi is known for turning up in all sorts of scientific equations, including those describing the DNA double helix, a rainbow, ripples spreading from where a raindrop fell into water, waves, navigation and more. <br /><br /><br /><br /> <br /><br />

 

[bigbrain]

Before Nasa buffoons have made this 3D cartoon:<br />http://www.nasa.gov/mov/121527main_MRI_impact.mov <br /><br />Move the cursor slowly.<br />What do you notice? <br /><br />It looks like the mushroom cloud. <br /><br />At Nasa our idiot artist has exaggerated. <br /><br />In Maya main menu he has choosen the wrong icon: instead of "normal bomb" he has used "nuclear bomb". <br /><br />After they have made this 3D cartoon:<br />http://www.nasa.gov/mov/121520main_HRI-Movie.mov<br /><br />Nasa buffoons have taken away some frames and now you can no longer see the flash that before it developed like a mushroom cloud. <br /><br />Now the movie runs more fastly. <br /><br />Someone has informed the New Animations Softwares Agency. <br /><br />I do not make fun. It is really that way. <br /><br />Ha, ha, ha.<br /> <br />

 

[thermionic]

>>Yup, should'a stuck with three...<br /><br />There, you see? Two people agree with me now! And I'll bet there's more out there lurking.

 

[petepan]

<img src="/images/icons/laugh.gif" />

 

[bigbrain]

Look at this:<br /><br />http://www.nasa.gov/mov/121520main_HRI-Movie.mov <br /><br />Strange, very strange.<br />The comet looks like the face of a bad animal.<br /><br />You can see his eyes, the nose and the mouth.<br /><br />Where does Nasa buffoons "Incraptor" hit that bad animal?<br /><br />In the right eye. <br /><br />Striking strike. 1,000 points.

 

[bigbrain]

Go here please<br />http://deepimpact.jpl.nasa.gov/press/050704jpl.html<br /><br />"DEEP IMPACT KICKS OFF FOURTH OF JULY WITH DEEP SPACE FIREWORKS<br /><br />After 172 days and 431 million kilometers (268 million miles) of deep space stalking, Deep Impact successfully reached out and touched comet Tempel 1. The collision between the coffee table-sized impactor and city-sized comet occurred at 1:52 a.m. EDT.<br /><br />What a way to kick off America's Independence Day," said Deep Impact Project Manager Rick Grammier of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. "The challenges of this mission and teamwork that went into making it a success, should make all of us very proud."<br /><br />It is your presumption, it is your buffoonery that reveals your lies.<br /><br />431 million kilometers of travel in the darkness of universe and you are able to hit the comet just at <br />America's Independence Day.<br /><br />Buffoons, terrible buffoons. "Fireworks", only those you can shoot.<br /><br />How will you astonish us at Christmas?

 

[bigbrain]

"And thanks to Northrop Grumman for the nav system… <br /><br />http://www.primezone.com/newsroom/?d=81673 <br /><br />They say: <br />"Much like a wine glass which rings when it is struck, the hemispherical-resonator gyro is a precisely machined glass hemispherical shell mounted within the spacecraft that is forced to ring by an electrical field," said Lawrence Linick, program manager for the Deep Impact program at Northrop Grumman. "Any rotation of the spacecraft containing the gyro will change the frequency or pitch of this ring. This change in pitch can then be detected within the gyro to determine the exact orientation of the spacecraft in space. This orientation information is then provided by the scalable SIRU to the space vehicle in order to guide it in its mission. The ringing vibration is so minute that it creates virtually no internal stress and fatigue effects in the gyro, leading to its unmatched reliability." <br /><br />"Much like a wine glass which rings when it is struck..." <br /><br />Hey, in our world nothing is simple like to drink a wine glass. <br /><br />This presumption reveals their lies. <br /><br />"This change in pitch can then be detected within the gyro to determine the exact orientation of the spacecraft in space". <br /><br />Has this incredible gyro also two eyes to be able to maintain the exact orientation towards the comet?<br /> <br />How does it works, Nasa buffoons? <br /><br />Untill those buffoons will brake their probes by retro burns of rocket engines, their rockets will always disperse in the darkness of universe buzzing around.<br /><br /><br /><br />

 

[bigbrain]

If Wayne Lee has not considered earth speed wrongly thinking the probe went at 36,000 kph, how has the probe been able to meet the comet in the right moment since it went at 140,000 kph (104,000 + 36,000)?<br /><br />Mistery of the deep universe.

 

[dgm1]

Duh! That one is simple bigbrain.<br /> He simply applied the principle of the Heinminch Constant to the problem to get his results. The Heinminch Constant principle states that any two distant objects being viewed simulataneously by humans will eventually meet if they are directed in the general direction of each other. This is the same principle that causes car crashes when there are witnesses. (it is actually the fault of the witness so the term "witness" is a bit off the mark.) <br /> The Heinminch constant in this case provides the mechanism for contact to be made. All the rersearchers needed to do was release the probe aimed in the general direction of the comet and then observe. The act of observing causes the paths to cross eventually. <br /> Now if they had tried to use poly-vector logorithms to do this they would have likely failed. That method only works if you have a terraflop of data and can run the poly vector logarithms using multiple abacusesses and applied force derivitive with the help of Helcyonic math proofs and only then if the variables are expressed using the Cyrillic alphabet. <br /> All of it is moot if you don't factor in the tailwind though. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[bigbrain]

Finally I have understood how Nasa buffoons can hit a comet.<br /><br />Look at this:<br />http://cmex.arc.nasa.gov/CMEX/Autonomous%20Control.html<br /><br />Simple like to drink a glass of wine.