Deep Impact reveals 'Secrets they dont want you to know abou

[bonzelite]

yes, i think a good many comets are of our own system. i also feel very strongly that many of them, although harder to find or know, are from outside this system. i've felt this for a while, and Stardust alludes to this possibiliy. there is no bubble shield around any solar system preventing stray material from entering. entire planets may drift in and out over the aeons, perhaps. <br /><br />a large part of this issue is the reluctance to just throw away a theory or model that has lots of vested interests and time involved in it's development and testing. so many models have what appears to be a very solid theory, when, actually, many are highly misrepresentational. the dirty snowball theory is such this kind of theory. it's a relatively young theory, too, perhaps made too prematurely as comets are still highly mysterious and unexplainable.

 

[zenonmars]

Good afternoon folks. <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" /><br /><br />I am almost satisfied that I have made my point, which is simply that this thread (other than GR88's first post) has been and is now <b><i>only</i></b> about bashing Richard C. Hoagland. Not about Deep Impact. Nor the initial observances (by <i>other</i> observatories around the globe) showing remarkable ingredients in the comet out-flow, such as "beach sand".<br /><br />And the many Deep Impact discussions in numerous other threads have played out entirely. I personally really don't care to re-visit these ideas. <br /><br />So in closing, I will give you all what you need: information! <img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" /><br /><br />qso1, you said something <i>very</i> insightful. You said, <font color="yellow">"I'm not sure if planets would explode or <b>why they would explode</b>."</font><br /><br />And the answer to this addresses a great many questions just recently raised here. Because, the VanFlandern EPT (exploded planet theory) hypothesis that obsesses Hoagland so much can only be explained by the <i>Hyperdimensional Physics</i> view of celestial mechanics. Cause otherwise: ya know, planets don't explode, right?<br /><br />So with the bevy of recently uncovered data which supports the Hoagland/Bera/VanFlandern EPT notions, it shouldn't shock anyone here to think that Richard would find new analyses of comet make-up quite facinating (especially if it adds even further weight to his HD physics theories).<br /><br />-------------------------------------------<br /><br />Yevaud: <font color="yellow">"As to the issue of regularity in nature: this is found everywhere in the real world, all by chance alignments and natural phenomena."</font><br /><br />Regularity in Nature is acknowledged. Not <b>"all'</b> regularity on Earth however. Read "The Mute Stones Speak". Had those arial photos of "natural" <i>regularities</i> been ignored, we would not have discovered the Roman cities dis <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[bonzelite]

to follow up on the comparison between the ruins in Iran and the formations inside the crater on Mars --yes, they look very alike, as if created by similar processes. <br /><br />regardless of my bashing of RCH, i do believe in ET and the possibility that Mars was visited by a race of beings aeons ago. why rule this out based on disbelief or overly-skeptical criticism? sure, ET may have been there. <br /><br />we're probably not going to really know for centuries. it's robotic remote sensing for the next century, i'm nearly convinced. it's taken almost 50 years to decide to go back to the moon and [hypothetically] return there. it will be another 50 beyond that to go to mars to collect a few rocks, plant a flag, and leave. <br /><br />it will be 2 or 3 more centuries before any semblance of adequate infrastructure is ever implemented on another planets' surface to comprehensively explore it with human lives.

 

[qso1]

ZenOnMars:<br />Cause otherwise: ya know, planets don't explode, right?<br /><br />Me:<br />Or more precisely, I know of no planets that have ever been observed exploding. Of course, we can only observe the planets in our solar system with sufficient detail to see one explode should it ever do so.<br /><br />We would have to be able to see planets in other solar systems to widen our database but the ideas of how planets form seem to preclude any possibility of them exploding. Stars certainly explode but considering what goes on inside stars, thats no surprise. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong>My borrowed quote for the time being:</strong></p><p><em>There are three kinds of people in life. Those who make it happen, those who watch it happen...and those who do not know what happened.</em></p> </div>

 

[qso1]

With any luck, maybe it won't take as long to do Mars if for no other reason, private enterprise lowering the cost of access to low orbit. This should make the task of getting to mars somewhat easier.<br /><br />Still, even with a mars base established near a feature of questionable origin, like paleontology here on earth. It may take decades to determine the features origins, unless I finally get my "Kilroy was here" example. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong>My borrowed quote for the time being:</strong></p><p><em>There are three kinds of people in life. Those who make it happen, those who watch it happen...and those who do not know what happened.</em></p> </div>