The truth is coming out!

[Gibsense]

In this case, as embarrassing as it is, those pilots showed they don't understand parallax and don't know how infrared cameras work. The most famous video released by the Navy clearly shows an object overflown by the plane that actually flies much more slowly (also see NASA analysis) and the more recent, ridiculously long but definite Pentagon re-analysis), and its speed, flight height and IR appearance is consistent with those of a duck.

You may be 100% correct here. Maybe that's why they were authorised for release. But I would say that would I not? The Tic Tac, or was it Tik Tok (not familiar with American sweets) is not so easy to explain away. If it were then we should worry about aviators' competence. Wow I have underestimated US pilots and their machines; let's see, they fly at a speed of --- without a stall and can shadow a duck for a lengthy period with targeting equipment. How far away would they need to be to hold that lock before passing a duck. I haven't done the maths but it sounds a bit iffy to me. Was it a long way from shore?

In your second paragraph, you don't understand your own point. Yes, unidentified aeial phenomena do exist. But they aren't a category unto themselves, they are only marked by being unidentified. And most of them can be identified upon closer inspection. Usually with something mundane like a plane, a planet or a lens reflection. Not what you wish for. Avoid wishful thinking.

The US Gov explicitly rules out reports where obvious explanations exist ( in their request for data). This to avoid reams of nonsense obscuring and distracting. You demean Western Pilots and should retract that statement and apologise perhaps. I assume you wrote this in the heat of the moment. They (the anomalies) are a category unto themselves; at least that is the intention.

It will be interesting to see what effect recent changes will have ( To Government and DoD staffing). Anyway I hope I have managed to address your 'points' I missed earlier. Please can you offer more substance to your claim that the officer Luis Elizondo is a crank

 

[Gibsense]

Maybe I should be more aggressive in my responses to the M4n8t. Let's start with the accusation that Lui somehow left his post in disgrace in 2017. An open letter from Harry Reid stating that contrary to Pentagon propaganda Lui worked for the 'Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program' (AATIP). Harry goes on to say he performed the leadership admirably. The letter is dated April 26th 2021
Harry Reid was the United States Senate Majority Leader. The Pentagon wrongly rumoured he (Lui) had no part to play in the AATIP.

Lui left to further alert the public of a possible threat to security by integrating with a similarly focused commercial organisation. It didn't work out but years later he was able together with many key people in positions of significance push back against the secrecy to achieve some disclosure and some protection for whistleblowers when revealing data to selected Senators.

Perhaps I should also indicate that the rumoured alien dead and also hard evidence damaged technology is probably true. The resistance to disclosure by modifying the proposed new disclosure laws is rather curious. It suggests there is much to hide. We can of course go deeper but I would encourage the curious to search the internet. Wikipeadia has contributions that are available I am told, but the script is locked (unusually). I have not checked this myself. Having made these comments, I am pleased to not have disclosed my address or confirmed I still reside in the UK mostly, lol