I believe that understanding physical properties as a math vector is very limiting to the concept. And to all other dynamics. A physical property is so much more than a vector.
To measure light, for me, is more than just measuring the speed of light, should say speed of a photon, that forms the flux of light.
After we measure that true speed, we need to vary the displacement and see how it shifts with motion.
I think there will be a great difference on that shift, depending on whether the emitter or the detector is displacing. I don’t believe it shifts like we have been told.
And then there is the very characteristic of light. That of alternating electrical frequency.
I believe the frequency of light is not an alternating electrical frequency, but an intermittent frequency.
I think light blinks. A series of discreet expanding(therefore rarefying) wave-fronts. These wave fronts have a density gradient, which imparts an acceleration on matter. In the form of a tilt or a torque of the matter fields.
The matter fields have momentum and inertia and responds and resets…… producing electrical frequency. A matter field bounce. Detection.
And the emission is an instant snap or discharge out into space of that wave field chunk. A chunk of field. NOT a stream of field. A cut chunk.
When the emitter moves, only the space between chunks changes. The off time of the blink.
When the detector moves, both the on time and the off time change in proportion. In proportion to the emitter shift. Which is un-proportioned.
The first shift is from the emitter and asymmetrical. The second shift is from the detector and is symmetrical.
Two shifts in one.
Thus the anti symmetric shift between emitter and detector motion.
I believe most of these suppositions can be demonstrated today with radio.
EM Propagation is duty cycle, not a frequency. And x-rays and gamma rays are monopole emissions. Only one electric pole. From solitary electrons and protons. No field alternations.
Of course I am considered a loon.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram