Does this theory solve the "Dark Matter" mystery?

[Alexbat]

After a brief review of the Decreasing Universe (D.U.) model, we will
derive a formula and the graph for the apparent velocity of stars (of a
Messier_33 galaxy) as a function of their radial distance from the
galactic center. This formula reproduces the same velocity curve
traditionally attributed to dark matter Here is the Link :

https://vixra.org/pdf/2503.0170v1.pdf

 

[Catastrophe]

Has anyone read this paper? If so, I would like to see your opinions.

https://vixra.org/pdf/2503.0170v1.pdf

Cat )

 

[Classical Motion]

My simple reasoning tells me that the characteristic direction of redshift is a product of distance, not velocity. It's the most obvious. To me.

I only read the first few words of the paper.

Didn't mean to distract.

 

[Catastrophe]

I read a lot more. Until one gets to the maths, I could see nothing outstandingly incorrect.
Of course, it depends on the assumptions, but what does not?
If it ends up as suspect, then you go back and re-examine the assumptions?
Isn't that how science works?

Cat

 

[Classical Motion]

I agree as long as the assumption can be measured and repeated. Without unexpected results found. Or direct evidence against the assumption.

Prove and disprove.

 

[Catastrophe]

Assumptions are fixed at the start, but subject to examination when results are obtained.

Is it not the assumption which can be repeated, and results (experimental data) so verified?

Cat

 

[Classical Motion]

The velocity of light has not been measured and only it's reflection has. A reflection takes time, and that time depends on wavelength. Light is a flux with many wavelengths, resulting in a reflection time average.

Even a one color laser still has this phase flux, giving a reflective time average.

And all of our theories are base on this unverified assumption.

 

[Catastrophe]

Google Search

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmJ5_7gGkBg



Cat