Einstein wins again! Quarks obey relativity laws, Large Hadron Collider finds

I am still wondering how a quark can be a "fundamental" particle when the combination of 2 down quarks and 1 up quark (a neutron) can become a combination of one down quark and 2 up quarks ( a proton) by emitting an electron, which is also supposed to be a "fundamental" particle that is not composed of quarks at all, and quarks are not supposedly containing electrons.

Typically, I see something like this from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark :
"A quark of one flavor can transform into a quark of another flavor only through the weak interaction, one of the four fundamental interactions in particle physics. By absorbing or emitting a W boson, any up-type quark (up, charm, and top quarks) can change into any down-type quark (down, strange, and bottom quarks) and vice versa. This flavor transformation mechanism causes the radioactive process of beta decay, in which a neutron (n) "splits" into a proton (p), an electron (e−) and an electron antineutrino (νe) (see picture). This occurs when one of the down quarks in the neutron (udd) decays into an up quark by emitting a virtual W− boson, transforming the neutron into a proton (uud). The W− boson then decays into an electron and an electron antineutrino.[72]"

For me, that indicates something entirely different from "building blocks" when a quantum physicist says "fundamental particle".
 

Latest posts