R
robnissen
Guest
You said: "Assuming that the interior of the planet is going to be warmer than the surface is an interesting hypothesis. . .<br /><br />However, it's observation which will establish that. And unlike some, I don't have to retreat into ignorance about the interior temps, or into places which have not and cannot be observed on this mission, in order to support a position."<br /><br />But the fact that the interior is warmer than than the surface is more than an interesting hypothesis because "observation" has established that there is a significant heat difference betweens the cracks and the surrounding surface area. There is NO hypothesis that that heat difference is related to ANY surface activity, so the only possible place for the heat difference to come from is the interior. Now whether the heat difference is sufficient to support a liquid water/ammonia mix, that is currently unknown. But "observation" has demonstrated that there is some sort of a heat source in the interior.<br /><br />BTW, NASA's own web site states "Scientists find the temperatures difficult to explain if sunlight is the only heat source. More likely, a portion of the polar region, including the "tiger stripe" fractures, is warmed by heat escaping from the interior."<br /><br />