<p>Lol Vogon 13! </p><p>And who will be going to Alpha Centauri, Telephone Sanitizers?</p><p>On a more serious note, I also question the massiveness of the thing. Assuming you wanted a 2x1 km cyclindrical ark, assuming a 1m-thick Graphite Epoxy skin and, say 5 meters of soil inside, that "only" masses around 120 million tons or 1.2x10E11 kg, 1000 times less than what you are planning on.</p><p>And why call it the Celestial Titanic, are you considering making it collide with a Celestial Iceberg? there are a few around beyond Neptune as a matter of fact.</p><p>Also, fyi I once did a (very long) computer simulation of planetary formation at Alpha Centauri and found that orbits around Centauri A and B were stable up to around 1.5 AU only. Beyond that the interferring gravity fields of the other star would usually send any would-be planets into deep space. Beyond 80 AU planetary orbits were stable again around the common center of mass of the two stars, though you wouldn't want to go out on any of them without your evening sweater. As Centauri A and B are both slightly less massive and less hot than our sun, their habitable zones (ie where water can exist as a liquid at pressures approaching Earth sea level) are within 1 AU so potentially habitable planets could exist around each of them, if they had the good sense to form in the right orbits.</p><p> </p><p> </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>“An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it.” John F. Kennedy</em></p> </div>