I want to believe — but yet another massive search for alien technosignatures just turned up nothing

Nov 25, 2019
160
59
10,660
Negative results are still "Good Science".

What we are learning or have learned is that technological civilizations are at least VERY rare. As we observe more and more in the coming decades we will be able to refine this and say "'very rare" with greater precision. Perhaps we will learn the number is "one per galaxy, on average". or whatever the number is.

Then the theorists can explain why the number is so low. My guess is that the transition from primitive to modern human intelligence required a statistically improbable event. That is a very rare genetic mutation that happened coincidently with a population bottleneck. The universe might be filled with "people" who can use a rock as a hammer and build a fire but only one in a million of them goes on to create agriculture and written language. THis is my guess. But see, this is the way science works, we observe that technology is extremely rare and then try to explain why and they have to find ways to test our explanations.

So we actually have learned a LOT from SETI. It is telling us that we must be the result of some very rare coincidence. What was it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rod and Joexo
The exoplanet sites, I am still waiting for life to be confirmed on any of them. NASA or exoplanet.eu sites.

https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/index.html, https://exoplanet.eu/home/

Looking at the exoplanet masses at .eu site, 104 are 2 or less earth masses. Example, AU Mic, all 7 of TRAPPIST-1 system, or others like tau Cet. Apparently we are not finding ET phoning home :) Other reports based upon the assumption of abiogenesis for the origin of life, our galaxy should contain many exoplanets with ET like life phoning home perhaps :)

Does planetary evolution favor human-like life? Study ups odds we're not alone, https://phys.org/news/2025-02-planetary-evolution-favor-human-life.html

"The model, which upends the decades-old "hard steps" theory that intelligent life was an incredibly improbable event, suggests that maybe it wasn't all that hard or improbable. A team of researchers at Penn State, who led the work, said the new interpretation of humanity's origin increases the probability of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe."
 
Nov 25, 2019
160
59
10,660
Logically, this resembles a certain retort to someone who complains that God didn't answer their prayers: "Yes, He did--and the answer was No."
Yes. Both are looking for confirmation of a belief that is not based on reason. So many people want Star Trek to be true or for there really to be gods living on Mt Olympus.

My argument is that SETI is a real science because it has returned real data. We now know a lot more about the universe. We know technological societies are at the most very rare. 70 years ago this was still an open question and now it is much more resolved. That is actual science
 
  • Like
Reactions: billslugg

Latest posts