O
observer7
Guest
I guess my vision has the CSA becoming a stable entitiy that allows its member states to have greater control and authority over their individual internal affairs. I believe that eventually they would "rejoin" the union to the north, but at the same time the federal government of the union would not have been able to apply so much power/pressure to the CSA states. <br /><br />I do have to agree that we might be better off with several smaller countries on the NA continent. But can't we get the same results by letting some "national" issues that cannot be decided to everyones satisfaction (abortion for example) be decided locally by the states, and then you can move to whatever state conforms to your views.<br /><br />Remember, the roles of the federal government are clearly defined in the Constitution, and the 10th Ammendment makes it clear that those rights/duties not enumerated in the Constitution are reserved for the states. Congress has worked around this thanks to the interstate commerce clause. It's time to reduce the size/scope of federal government and let the states (and local) governments take more responsibility for the citizens.<br /><br />We live in a great country, with incredible freedoms. But most people don't realize that with freedom comes responsibility to take care of your own affairs and most importantly, a duty not to interfere with others freedoms. The federal government, by trying to satisfy everybody in effect satifies nobody and impinges on all of our freedoms through their actions that attempt to keep the middle balance.<br /><br />One more though on the subject. It's not the liberals or conservatives that are dangerous. its the extremeist on both sides who can't see anything that doesn't resonate with their particular worldview.<br /><br />Thanks for reading my rantings.<br /><br />--<br /><br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <em><font size="2">"Time exists so that everything doesn't happen at once" </font></em><font size="2">Albert Einstein</font> </div>