Is Conserved Light the Impetus of Spatial Bodies ?

Nov 14, 2024
156
3
85
Visit site
Newton said a body in motion will remain in motion unless acted upon by an external force . This applying to spatial bodies and orbits . So ok , all good Mr Newton but why ?


What is the impetus , the force that makes something move , in your statement?

Well I have thought long and hard on this and concluded the impetus of spatial bodies is conserved light . The conserved light of the body attracted to the vector ahead of it because the Eigen Vector is in a lower energy state than the spatial body .


I have discounted the electrodynamics of moving bodies because space has zero conductive/attractive force in regards to elementary charge . However , we know light is attracted to lower Eigenstates.

Thanks for reading ,comments welcome!
 
Nov 14, 2024
156
3
85
Visit site
Light is forcefully pulled through space by Gravity-B so any matter that conserves light is also going to have an applied force of Gravity-B acting on it !

When a spatial body conserves light , the light has inertia relative to the body but the body has no inertia relative to its position in space . The light that is conserved is pulled by Gravity-B which in turn moves the body .

So if you pushed an object into space , it will carry on moving because the conserved light is attracted to the space ahead .

The charge of a body does not act or is affected by space , the charge is dependent to the body .
 
Last edited:
Nov 14, 2024
156
3
85
Visit site
Here is a visual of the process .

I tie a rope to your waste and you hold on tight to a Bicycle . I pull the rope and you are pulled along but because of your inertia on the Bike , the Bike moves with you . Not once did I apply direct force on the bike .
 
Aug 15, 2024
73
14
35
Visit site
I don't follow your example, as the rider and bike are one moving object, and any force applied to the rider is also applied to the bike. Light isn't pulled. It's massless photons. "Conserved light" is an oxymoron.
 
Nov 14, 2024
156
3
85
Visit site
I don't follow your example, as the rider and bike are one moving object, and any force applied to the rider is also applied to the bike. Light isn't pulled. It's massless photons. "Conserved light" is an oxymoron.
Photons have no ''engine'' or propulsion . Photons are most certainly pulled !

This can be simply viewed as ''hot to cold'' .

I have many physical examples I can give to prove this .

Here try this diagram then you may understand the Bike example !

 

TRENDING THREADS