I've just worked out what caused the Ice Age!

[Thermoman]

The Earth wasn't always positioned in the region of the present Sun . Suns ''distinguish'' softly ,freeing any orbiting bodies . The Earth froze over until it settled in orbit by this new Sun to defrost .

 

[COLGeek]

Another theory? How did you come to this conclusion?

How did this affect the other planets?

 

[Thermoman]

Another theory? How did you come to this conclusion?

How did this affect the other planets?

A theory with physical facts yes !

I came to this conclusion because this is what the physics presents !

I am not sure about the outcomes of other planets , that would be speculation !

I am sure my theory is physically possible which is a grave concern because it will happen again . It is inevitable because space-time expands decreasing the tensors on the core of Stars !

 

[COLGeek]

A theory with physical facts yes !

I came to this conclusion because this is what the physics presents !

I am not sure about the outcomes of other planets , that would be speculation !

I am sure my theory is physically possible which is a grave concern because it will happen again . It is inevitable because space-time expands decreasing the tensors on the core of Stars !

How? What physics suggests this?

Your theory is also speculation, is it not?

Please explain.

 

[Thermoman]

How? What physics suggests this?

Your theory is also speculation, is it not?

Please explain.

It is 3.30am here now, I am getting rather tired . In brief :

Space-Time is spaces conserved energy .space and time . This energy is static but not immovable , it can curve etc .
Because of external force , Gravity-B , the impetus of light . Every now and again a BH opens up in space-time because of the external force stretching space-time . When one of these holes open up , it attracts energy , they turn into a sun .
As space-time expands , the tensor of the hole decreases in magnitude closing the hole gradually.

 

[COLGeek]

It is 3.30am here now, I am getting rather tired . In brief :

Space-Time is spaces conserved energy .space and time . This energy is static but not immovable , it can curve etc .
Because of external force , Gravity-B , the impetus of light . Every now and again a BH opens up in space-time because of the external force stretching space-time . When one of these holes open up , it attracts energy , they turn into a sun .
As space-time expands , the tensor of the hole decreases in magnitude closing the hole gradually.

This seems quite a stretch. I think I'll wait for others to pipe up.

 

[Thermoman]

This seems quite a stretch. I think I'll wait for others to pipe up.

Of course you are welcome to wait for others to join the discussion .

The simple way to envision this is to imagine a ball of rubber bands and the bands are all been stretched outwards by an external force creating an empty core . The empty core then pulling back !

I think Newtons third law applies if I recall correctly!

 

[COLGeek]

Of course you are welcome to wait for others to join the discussion .

The simple way to envision this is to imagine a ball of rubber bands and the bands are all been stretched outwards by an external force creating an empty core . The empty core then pulling back !

I think Newtons third law applies if I recall correctly!

That would apply to all objects in orbit. Not one.

I am struggling with how recapture occurred.

 

[Gibsense]

The Earth wasn't always positioned in the region of the present Sun

The solar system formed about 4.6 billion years ago, and during the first few hundred million years, there was a lot of movement as planets settled into their orbits. Gravitational interactions, collisions, and migrations could have shifted Earth's position. However, since then, Earth's orbit around the Sun has been relatively stable. Any major changes would have happened over those early cosmic timescales, so we're talking billions of years ago.

Snowball Earth was less than a billion years ago. There have been a number of ice ages (we are technically still in one I think that's correct

 

[Gibsense]

Space-Time is spaces conserved energy .space and time . This energy is static but not immovable , it can curve etc .
Because of external force , Gravity-B , the impetus of light . Every now and again a BH opens up in space-time because of the external force stretching space-time . When one of these holes open up , it attracts energy , they turn into a sun .
As space-time expands , the tensor of the hole decreases in magnitude closing the hole gradually.

So, an external force causes spacetime to adopt a gravity-well shape and this in turn attracts mass energy to eventually form a sun. Gravity theoretically could - from an external position outside the universe - cause this. You would need to check this external gravity effect.
Apparently string theory involving higher dimensional spaces does allow this but then there is no real proof of the possibility. To be positive I do not think it can be ruled out but the whole speculation needs to be placed 5 or more billion years ago. As a route to causing one of the ice ages, it is barely credible. Interesting thought though.

 

[Thermoman]

As a route to causing one of the ice ages, it is barely credible. Interesting thought though.

Well actually if the Sun stopped working , the Earth would shoot off into space so it is actually a viable answer to an ice age ! The temperatue of the Earth would almost instantly lose all the ''heat'' . I already know and can prove Gravity-B !

 

[Thermoman]

The solar system formed about 4.6 billion years ago, and during the first few hundred million years, there was a lot of movement as planets settled into their orbits. Gravitational interactions, collisions, and migrations could have shifted Earth's position. However, since then, Earth's orbit around the Sun has been relatively stable. Any major changes would have happened over those early cosmic timescales, so we're talking billions of years ago.

Snowball Earth was less than a billion years ago. There have been a number of ice ages (we are technically still in one I think that's correct

You are providing the answer based on present information , the age is made up .

 

[Catastrophe]

Well actually if the Sun stopped working , the Earth would shoot off into space so it is actually a viable answer to an ice age ! The temperatue of the Earth would almost instantly lose all the ''heat'' . I already know and can prove Gravity-B !

if the Sun stopped working , the Earth would shoot off into space so it is actually a viable answer to an ice age

It is only a viable answer, if the "Sun stopping working" is a viable precursor.

I don't believe such sudden occurrences are realistic at stellar levels, without some other factor needing to be taken into account, e.g., collision, explosion. That is, no sudden disappearance without other major factors.

Cat

 

[Thermoman]

It is only a viable answer, if the "Sun stopping working" is a viable precursor.

I don't believe such sudden occurrences are realistic at stellar levels, without some other factor needing to be taken into account, e.g., collision, explosion. That is, no sudden disappearance without other major factors.

Cat

Space-Time expanding is a major factor because of how the stress tensors work !

The position of a BH changes , one closes and one opens somewhere else. Of course there is other possibilites such as inertia frame dragging . This off course allowing the Sun to move with the Hole !


Why not both , Einstein would of said !

Oddly in inertia frame dragging , a Sun could be dragged to the edge of space-time and then the BH pop like bubble !

 

[Catastrophe]

radius equals mass 1 plus mass 2 divided by a force

Equations must balance dimensionally.

Length = Mass + (mass / (mass x acceleration) i.e., metre = kilogram + kilogram / (metre/sec^2)

is simply not a viable equation.

Cat

 

[Gibsense]

Space-Time expanding is a major factor because of how the stress tensors work

Ok, so the movement of matter and energy might cause stuff. Er yes. Lol

 

[Thermoman]

Equations must balance dimensionally.

Length = Mass + (mass / (mass x acceleration) i.e., metre = kilogram + kilogram / (metre/sec^2)

is simply not a viable equation.

Cat

My equation is a mathematical verb , regardless of how you interpret the answer , my mathematical verb is correct !

You pick something up using a force , when you pick that something up you create a radius .

So the radius equals masses divided by force !

You didn't know mathematics had verbs did you ?

A calculator gives inccorect answers because it doesn't understand mathematical verbs !

 

[Gibsense]

A calculator gives inccorect answers because it doesn't understand mathematical verbs !

Mine is educated it knows to add, subtract, multiply, divide, and solve. It's iffy on simplify, integrate, differentiate but it does ok for me because I am simply minded,

 

[Catastrophe]

My equation is a mathematical verb , regardless of how you interpret the answer , my mathematical verb is correct !

You pick something up using a force , when you pick that something up you create a radius .

So the radius equals masses divided by force !

You didn't know mathematics had verbs did you ?

A calculator gives inccorect answers because it doesn't understand mathematical verbs !

That says it all.

Thank you for the funniest comedy of the day.

Cat

 

[Thermoman]

Mine is educated it knows to add, subtract, multiply, divide, and solve. It's iffy on simplify, integrate, differentiate but it does ok for me because I am simple

A calculator can't even give a correct answer to a simple sum . Here try it

2/2+1 =?

Your calculator will give the incorrect answer of 2 .

 

[Thermoman]

That says it all.

Thank you for the funniest comedy of the day.

Cat

F=GmM/r^2 isn't a mathematical verb , it fails to satisfy mathematical logic .

F=ma and F=ma2 are mathematical verbs !

 

[Catastrophe]

F=GmM/r^2 isn't a mathematical verb , it fails to satisfy mathematical logic .

F=ma and F=ma2 are mathematical verbs !

F=GmM/r^2 isn't a mathematical verb , it fails to satisfy mathematical logic .

This is the equation for the Force of Gravity.
Gravity is constant (G) x the product of the masses (M and m) divided by the square of the separation (distance).

By F = ma, I assume the equation refers to Force = Mass x Acceleration.

What F = ma2 means, I do not now.

But the first 2 equations are balanced.

Cat

 

[Gibsense]

That says it all.

Thank you for the funniest comedy of the day.

Cat

Well, nearly Cat. I have just tested my calculator as Thermo suggested it got the sum wrong (or did it)
2/2= 1 1+1=2
Good joke - he had me guessing "yeah that's right it says 2/2 +1 =2"

 

[Gibsense]

A calculator can't even give a correct answer to a simple sum . Here try it

2/2+1 =?

Your calculator will give the incorrect answer of 2 .

Thermo your calculator does not have brackets ( ) ? Get a new calculator. If it does have brackets you need to revise the rules.

 

[Catastrophe]

A calculator can't even give a correct answer to a simple sum . Here try it

2/2+1 =?

Your calculator will give the incorrect answer of 2 .

2/2 + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2. Correct.

You would need 2 / (2 + 1) to make it different.


Cat