Joining the Dots: Speculation of Continuous Creation

Introduction

We think of space as empty, but it's not. Space is a dynamic medium filled with quantum fluctuations and virtual particles of various kinds, forming what is known as Quantum Foam. The density of this foam varies and increases near massive objects. The number of virtual particles per volume rises in areas with gravitational wells.
This constant appearance and disappearance of particles contribute to the universe having an average mass-energy greater than zero. This whole process adds up to what's known as Zero Point Energy, meaning the universe has a baseline energy level that's not zero, even as a vacuum.
Bear in mind that these Virtual Particles have the potential to become real particles of many types. For example, Hawking Radiation creates a real particle in our universe as part of the process

Kerr Black Holes

Feeding and Spinning black holes, (Kerrs) in our universe accrete mass, and continue to grow in size and gravitational influence. The intense conditions within the black hole, including the extreme spin and frame dragging, could reach a point where a critical transformation occurs. Material falling past the event horizon has the angular momentum preserved. Spinning material falls toward the centre of the black hole forming a spinning Torus with increasing spin as the volume of space reduces.

The Spinning Torus

An analogy; a Tornado reaches a point where it slings materials outward. In a similar way the frame dragging spin could reach a level where frame dragging is so extreme that the Torus becomes nearly detached from the Black Hole space with only one possible exit: A Big Bang

Emergent Universe

A new big bang means a new universe (perhaps ours was birthed this way). So, in this newly formed universe, the influx of matter and energy from the black hole could drive the expansion of space. This could occur in a manner consistent with the dynamics of the universe we observe—where the continuous influx of energy leads to an expanding spacetime, potentially forming a hypersphere or other complex geometries. From this point, all is well documented but....

Continuous creation

We should not assume that this is a once-off process. It seems likely that a feeding black hole will continue to supply the Spinning Torus with more material - like a Tornado travelling across the countryside. The Torus might, somehow, engage both the material and the new universe in a constant flow of space and mass. The potential processes are complex enough with many forces in conflict that I can find room to hide behind them at this point

Cosmic Time:

The expansion of space within this new universe could be related to the concept of time. As space expands, the progression of events (or what we perceive as time) unfolds. In this way, the process of a black hole feeding could contribute to the ongoing evolution of the new universe. Rather than contemplating time as a force for expansion, we might be justified in this scenario of reversing the logic and considering the expansion of hyperspherical space as creating the time process.

Maybe
 
Last edited:
Aug 15, 2024
104
21
85
Visit site
The tornado analogy is flawed, as they are almost opposites of each other.
A tornado is short-lived; a BH is virtually forever.
A tornado throws things outward; a BH draws everything inward.
A tornado has no gravitational influence; a BH defines gravitational influence.
A tornado is a result of temporary weather patterns; a BH is the result of permanently accumulated gravity.
etc.
 
The tornado analogy is flawed, as they are almost opposites of each other.
A tornado is short-lived; a BH is virtually forever.
A tornado throws things outward; a BH draws everything inward.
A tornado has no gravitational influence; a BH defines gravitational influence.
A tornado is a result of temporary weather patterns; a BH is the result of permanently accumulated gravity.
etc.
All analogies break at some point but the differences you point out are trivial except for one which I see does not work for you even though it collects material throws it upward within the spin and then throws it out. That's ok

You missed some off:

A tornado's medium is air whereas a black hole's is space.
A tornado acts from a cloud down to the ground falling with terrestrial gravity whereas material spinning within a black hole falls toward the star's gravity (NB the star exists within the space of a BH at the centre of the sphere made by the event horizon)
The Tornado's form is held by air pressure whereas material in a BH is restricted by gravity well shape
A tornado's extremity is wind shear whereas a BH material Torus is frame dragging
A tornado is formed by the weather environment but a spinning Torus is dependent on it BH Host size , galaxy and food

Yeah, you are right there are so many differences including that you never see in a black hole: Fancy Boots or cows but you do sometimes in a Tornado.
Lol, please excuse the sarcasm my sense of humour is a bit odd people tell me :D
 
Last edited:
I think that space is emptiness. Time and dimension come from matter. I think this cosmos is one time frame. With a constant length reference, the length of e.

Full of relative velocity frames. Purely mechanical.

Earth is a singular tumor. The only singularity in this cosmos.
 
If there is accelerative expansions in and to a Newtonian universe, there is Newtonian equal but opposite accelerative contractions. Space moves because it isn't emptiness alone (an infinite density at once being an infinite hole). More, it is my thought bubble universes collide and move through each other constantly having, automatically manipulating, "fabric" results in recognizable microcosmic and macrocosmic aethereal fine structure physics galore. Warps. Blackholes. Wormholes. Heat. Time and time reversal. Spatial and spatial-time phenomena galore.
 
I think that space is emptiness. Time and dimension come from matter. I think this cosmos is one time frame. With a constant length reference, the length of e.

Full of relative velocity frames. Purely mechanical.

Earth is a singular tumor. The only singularity in this cosmos.

As an engineer, your knack for working with an imaginative, hands-on approach, is impressive. It's remarkable how you can figure out the best way to tackle challenges when dealing with machines and gauges.

I'm surprised that detecting virtual particles through the Casimir Effect doesn't appeal. It aligns well with an engineer's practical mindset by illustrating that space is filled with energy and virtual matter, rather than being empty.
 
I don’t believe the Casimir effect is needed to demonstrate virtual particles. That’s a separate dynamic.

All that’s needed to measure virtual particles is a radio receiver or a fast acting thermometer.

Virtual particles are an illusion. And a misunderstanding of propagated field superposition.

STATIC. Static is a superposition. A NON interacting superposition. One can convert this NON interacting dynamic into an acting dynamic ONLY with matter. In other words the static and the temp, is not there, unless you measure it. ONLY the matter used to measure it, allows it to form.

If matter is not there, no interaction.

Charge(matter) field interaction is much, much different than propagated wave interaction.

Two completely different types of superposition. Two physics.

Virtual particles are a measurement illusion. And there are other types of false measurements.

Like redshift. Or any light dynamic. Maxwell and Einstein were and are wrong about light.

Light has two parts, one is real and one is imaginary. ONLY the imaginary part of the emission changes with motion.

It’s a constant quantum dynamic. Discreet and intermittent. The discrete part, the real part is constant.

Only the imaginary part, changes with motion.

Giving light a logarithmic shift. With distance. Alone, separate from the inverse square law.

I can explain the mechanics, need a mathematician to describe this mathematically.

This will be a totally new math equation.

This formula will describe the change in a duty cycle, with respect to velocity, frequency, AND distance. A second distance law added to the inverse square. And different ratios of shift.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts