The thing you will be looking for is not a planet or a planet's shadow. You will be looking for a bulge in the electromagnetic plume our electromagnetic equipment detects as any star.<br />Consider, we can see individual items in galaxies so far away that mathematics cannot do justice to the distance, but we can't get a visual image of the planets in the next solar system. There is a certain discrepancy in this.<br />Actually, some wonderful folks recently detected these bulges in the electromagnetic discharge of a nearby star. Them be planets!<br />Please for a moment consider that the images we see as stars are not transmitted, coherent light, but instead are the harmonics of other things. That is a rather bizarre perspective, but I am so fond of them as a group. The best part is that I can demonstrate it in a paragraph.<br /><br />Imagine a star in a distant galaxy. You are asked to pretend that the light emitted by this star is headed toward Earth and your detection system - eye, telescope... BUT, as the light travels, it must pass beside a nearer solar system. The electromagnetic signal gets bent by the electromagnetic/gravitational well of the solar system and we don't get to see it. If you consider that the nearer solar system is in the distant galaxy as well, then by being bent only by an insideously small angle, we don't see it. The problem is that, as telescopes get better, we can look at any portion of the sky and see stars bunched-up, right next to each other. You are asked to believe that either light cannot be bent by prismatic gravity and electromagnetic fields, or that light does not travel between stars. Look up into the night sky...dark with tiny dots. <br /><br />I am standing here, declaring that millennia of stargazing and over a century of quanta have been barking up the wrong tree, and that what we see as starlight, starbright is actually the harmonics of gravity between the two suns. I can appreciate what some of you are winding up to toss... but I