Swampcat, I completely agree. I would've responded sooner, but I was at work all night, just got home. So, your 8am today is my 8pm.<br /><br />I didn't want to go off on a long diatribe, which I try not to do (I have here and there). SETI <b>is</b> as legitimate scientific pursuit, and I agree that there's great merit in that end of it. But, the reality is that here, on SDC, the "tin hat crowd" (interesting name, that!) has taken that forum as their own.<br /><br />I included all of those threads, as they either begin and progress with no real science in them or, in the lone case of "Tachyons," has devolved into something off from what it could have been. Mind, I'm not saying that people don't have an interest in them, and achieve joy in participating in them. That's perfectly fine. But, SSA is about legitimate science, and so I just think they should be elsewhere.<br /><br />Claywoman. No, your understanding of science if probably good. But the subject matter is toned upwards or downwards in complexity, depending on the matter and the audience. I admit the tachyon one did get a bit complex, as did the one on Quantum Physics.<br /><br />So if you ever run into one of those threads, and need it made a bit more user-friendly for you, just ask. I think any of us who do these sort of explanations would be more than happy to do so.<br /><br />Jatslo: Hehe. Dogs indeed! <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" /><br /><br />ES:<br /><br />And they are indeed rocks. Capiche? <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Differential Diagnosis: </em>"<strong><em>I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are</em></strong>."<br /> </p> </div>