Moon Hoax Being Covered Up By Moon Probes

[Saiph]

<p>Speedfreak's response basically covers my opinion on the matter.&nbsp; Bombarding non-existent sites to obscure their existence....is absurd and counter productive.</p><p>Though I will point out that nukes would work just fine on the moon.&nbsp; There wouldn't be much of a shockwave, but there is still enough energy liberated to obliderate things in the immediate area.&nbsp; And if it's a ground blast, there will be plenty of debris for some more collateral damage. </p><p>As for going to the moon, I'd like to drag up the laser reflectors left on the moon and still used to monitor it's orbital variations to this day. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p align="center"><font color="#c0c0c0"><br /></font></p><p align="center"><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">--------</font></em></font><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">--------</font></em></font><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">----</font></em></font><font color="#666699">SaiphMOD@gmail.com </font><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">-------------------</font></em></font></p><p><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">"This is my Timey Wimey Detector.  Goes "bing" when there's stuff.  It also fries eggs at 30 paces, wether you want it to or not actually.  I've learned to stay away from hens: It's not pretty when they blow" -- </font></em></font><font size="1" color="#999999">The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>

 

[LivianaMari]

My grandfather worked there and said that, yes, it did happen.But since I wasn't there I cannot say, and perhaps even my grandfather may have not been present then. Many other things people do not know and would also fascinate also did happen. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[origin]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>But since I wasn't there I cannot say, and perhaps even my grandfather may have not been present then. Posted by LivianaMari</DIV></p><p>If you must be present to believe something actually occurred then you will be forced to assume the all of the history you have not directly experienced is so much fiction.&nbsp; How far does this thinking go - does that mean you cannot say that Antartica exists for sure?&nbsp; <br /></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[brandbll]

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>My grandfather worked there and said that, yes, it did happen.But since I wasn't there I cannot say, and perhaps even my grandfather may have not been present then. Many other things people do not know and would also fascinate also did happen. <br />Posted by LivianaMari</DIV><br /><br />Yes, i believe it was your grandpa who i spoke to regarding this matter.&nbsp; We won't tell anyone his name for his own safety.&nbsp; <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="3">You wanna talk some jive? I'll talk some jive. I'll talk some jive like you've never heard!</font></p> </div>

 

[Mee_n_Mac]

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Yes, i believe it was your grandpa who i spoke to regarding this matter.&nbsp; We won't tell anyone his name for his own safety.&nbsp; <br />Posted by <strong>brandbll</strong></DIV><br /><br />If you run into him again, please ask if he's seen any strange armadillos lying about.&nbsp; I'm missing one and can't find it.&nbsp;&nbsp; Thx.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;K, buh-bye <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>-----------------------------------------------------</p><p><font color="#ff0000">Ask not what your Forum Software can do do on you,</font></p><p><font color="#ff0000">Ask it to, please for the love of all that's Holy, <strong>STOP</strong> !</font></p> </div>

 

[brandbll]

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Ok, so we all know that the US hasn't been able to locate Osama Bin Laden, right?&nbsp; Well why not?&nbsp; Why can't tehy find him?&nbsp;Hmmm, this must tie in to the OP somehow...... I know! &nbsp;Osama is hiding on the moon, right? &nbsp; <br />Posted by crazyeddie</DIV><br /><br />Most evidence indicates that OBL was actually aboard the SMART-1 spacecraft.&nbsp; Why do you think we receive videos from him so infrequently?&nbsp; Takes a&nbsp; long time for a video to get from the Moon to the US aboard SMART-1... <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="3">You wanna talk some jive? I'll talk some jive. I'll talk some jive like you've never heard!</font></p> </div>

 

[sponge]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Most evidence indicates that OBL was actually aboard the SMART-1 spacecraft.&nbsp; Why do you think we receive videos from him so infrequently?&nbsp; Takes a&nbsp; long time for a video to get from the Moon to the US aboard SMART-1... <br />Posted by brandbll</DIV><br /><br />Hi brandbll,</p><p>Are you serious?, or are you just trying to lure&nbsp;a few &nbsp;conspiracy theorists&nbsp;into some false sense of security. By the way, how do start a conversation with a Nasa official, with out even knowing his name, or even being entirely sure he worked for nasa, did you stike up a conversation with some bloke on a bus, just curious to know how you come to the point of conversation.</p><p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em><u>SPONGE</u></em></p> </div>

 

[Archer17]

He's yanking your chains <img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/content/scripts/tinymce/plugins/emotions/images/smiley-wink.gif" border="0" alt="Wink" title="Wink" /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[brandbll]

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Hi brandbll,Are you serious?, or are you just trying to lure&nbsp;a few &nbsp;conspiracy theorists&nbsp;into some false sense of security. By the way, how do start a conversation with a Nasa official, with out even knowing his name, or even being entirely sure he worked for nasa, did you stike up a conversation with some bloke on a bus, just curious to know how you come to the point of conversation.&nbsp; <br />Posted by sponge</DIV><br /><br />Actually, i did meet that bloke on a bus.&nbsp; And i didn't know his name until i started talking to him.&nbsp; We had a few drinks, i ordered another round well he was in the can and then i slipped him a forget-me-now in his drink and next thing you know he spilled all the beans. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="3">You wanna talk some jive? I'll talk some jive. I'll talk some jive like you've never heard!</font></p> </div>

 

[sponge]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Actually, i did meet that bloke on a bus.&nbsp; And i didn't know his name until i started talking to him.&nbsp; We had a few drinks, i ordered another round well he was in the can and then i slipped him a forget-me-now in his drink and next thing you know he spilled all the beans. <br />Posted by brandbll</DIV></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Well done, how bout slipping some of those pills in the post for me, i could use them on few test subjects, might turn out quite prifitable or yourself <img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/content/scripts/tinymce/plugins/emotions/images/smiley-laughing.gif" border="0" alt="Laughing" title="Laughing" /><br /></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em><u>SPONGE</u></em></p> </div>

 

[The_Eagle_has_landed]

<p class="MsoNormal">Moon Hoax or not I just want to build a solar power station on the moon to provide power for moon operations and maybe beam whatever we don't use back to Earth. Provide ideas on how we can do this including costs of building and maintaining it and if you're good at drawing come up with some designs on what this facility will look like.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[brandbll]

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'> Moon Hoax or not I just want to build a solar power station on the moon to provide power for moon operations and maybe beam whatever we don't use back to Earth. Provide ideas on how we can do this including costs of building and maintaining it and if you're good at drawing come up with some designs on what this facility will look like. <br />Posted by The_Eagle_has_landed</DIV><br /><br />Lsiten buddy i create conspiracies, not miracles.&nbsp; I already have my hands full the way it is with trying to think of new ideas to refute arguments against my off the wall moon conspiracy.&nbsp; <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="3">You wanna talk some jive? I'll talk some jive. I'll talk some jive like you've never heard!</font></p> </div>

 

[SLOW6]

radioactive moon now... <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <strong><em>In an infinite Universe, any point can be said to be the centre as there are an infinite number of stars either side of that point... </em></strong> </div>

 

[brandbll]

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>radioactive moon now... <br />Posted by SLOW6</DIV><br /><br />No, not now, not ever... <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="3">You wanna talk some jive? I'll talk some jive. I'll talk some jive like you've never heard!</font></p> </div>

 

[trumptor]

I never figured they'd try to blow up the lack of evidence. I always thought they'd design a rocket with a moon boot attached to the bottom that would land on the moon and make the footprint and then would take off again. I'm actually kind of dissappointed because I think this would be a smoother plan of action. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em><font color="#0000ff">______________</font></em></p><p><em><font color="#0000ff">Caution, I may not know what I'm talking about.</font></em></p> </div>

 

[moonstarsquazars]

you gys do realize apollo 13 never landed on the moon so no landing site to toss an armadillo at

 

[brandbll]

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>you gys do realize apollo 13 never landed on the moon so no landing site to toss an armadillo at <br />Posted by moonstarsquazars</DIV><br /><br />Actually, it did land on the Moon.&nbsp; NASA just said it didn't because they knew that in the upcoming years they'd be able to reap millions of dollars from a movie created about the a crazy rescue story.&nbsp; In an essence, the trip paid for itself with the the movie money that came out of the almost impossible dilemna that was Apollo 13.&nbsp; So yes, sorry to break your bubble but they did land on the moon and a probe hit the site where they landed and destroyed all evidence of it. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="3">You wanna talk some jive? I'll talk some jive. I'll talk some jive like you've never heard!</font></p> </div>

 

[lampblack]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'> And so the rabbit hole deepens... <br /> Posted by brandbll</DIV></p><p>Yes, Alice... </p><p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font color="#0000ff"><strong>Just tell the truth and let the chips fall...</strong></font> </div>

 

[dragon04]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Yes, Alice... &nbsp; <br /> Posted by lampblack</DIV></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Mythbusters dedicated an entire episode to busting the most compelling "evidence" that the Moon Landing(s) was faked.&nbsp;</p><p>I was impressed. And yes.. A flag CAN wave in a vacuum. In fact, it will wave longer than in atmosphere. They also showed that even though an astronaut coming down a lander's ladder might be totally in the lander's shade that his white suit can appear to be lit as if from another light source simply due to the same thing that makes the Moon so bright at night. Light reflected off of the regolith.</p><p>They also reproduced defined boot prints (in a vacuum) in a material used to simulate real lunar regolith, and showed how some shadows in the field of a picture might not look "parallel" to others due to intervening terrain.&nbsp;</p><p>The Mythbusters did their usual thorough job through science and experimentation to debunk the debunkers. </p><p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <em>"2012.. Year of the Dragon!! Get on the Dragon Wagon!".</em> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>&nbsp;Mythbusters dedicated an entire episode to busting the most compelling "evidence" that the Moon Landing(s) was faked.&nbsp;I was impressed. And yes.. A flag CAN wave in a vacuum. In fact, it will wave longer than in atmosphere. They also showed that even though an astronaut coming down a lander's ladder might be totally in the lander's shade that his white suit can appear to be lit as if from another light source simply due to the same thing that makes the Moon so bright at night. Light reflected off of the regolith.They also reproduced defined boot prints (in a vacuum) in a material used to simulate real lunar regolith, and showed how some shadows in the field of a picture might not look "parallel" to others due to intervening terrain.&nbsp;The Mythbusters did their usual thorough job through science and experimentation to debunk the debunkers. &nbsp; <br />Posted by dragon04</DIV><br /><br />I'm not always happy with how accurately Mythbuters recreate the relevant science, but I gave this episode a B+. It was on last night. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[brandbll]

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>I'm not always happy with how accurately Mythbuters recreate the relevant science, but I gave this episode a B+. It was on last night. <br />Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV><br /><br />Ditto.&nbsp; There was one recently that really irked me, i can't remember which it was(andit's driving me nuts), so i'll post it when i remember it. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="3">You wanna talk some jive? I'll talk some jive. I'll talk some jive like you've never heard!</font></p> </div>

 

[brandbll]

Well, i remember one of their tests that POed me.&nbsp; The "Hit the ground running" test.&nbsp; See, they put a mat in front of the 3 younger people that were testing the method so that it would stop them.&nbsp; They weren't running that far inthe first place too.&nbsp; So first, they weren't using a decent distance to test the result, and second they were slowing themselves down before they got to the point of testing because they don't want to slam into the mat with total disregard for their body.&nbsp; These people have obviously never played baseball, because the first thing they teach you is to overrun first base because simply trying to run up and stop at first base is much slower.&nbsp; Therefore the mythbusting crew screwed up the results they were getting. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="3">You wanna talk some jive? I'll talk some jive. I'll talk some jive like you've never heard!</font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Well, i remember one of their tests that POed me.&nbsp; The "Hit the ground running" test.&nbsp; See, they put a mat in front of the 3 younger people that were testing the method so that it would stop them.&nbsp; They weren't running that far inthe first place too.&nbsp; So first, they weren't using a decent distance to test the result, and second they were slowing themselves down before they got to the point of testing because they don't want to slam into the mat with total disregard for their body.&nbsp; These people have obviously never played baseball, because the first thing they teach you is to overrun first base because simply trying to run up and stop at first base is much slower.&nbsp; Therefore the mythbusting crew screwed up the results they were getting. <br />Posted by brandbll</DIV><br /><br />The one I recall that bothered me involved arrows. They did&nbsp;a number of tests, none of which really described the actual condistions. Next time I see it (which I'm sure will be soon knowing TDC) I'll write down what bugged me. That one earned a C- <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[a_lost_packet_]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>The one I recall that bothered me involved arrows. They did&nbsp;a number of tests, none of which really described the actual condistions. Next time I see it (which I'm sure will be soon knowing TDC) I'll write down what bugged me. That one earned a C- Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p>I like Mythbusters but, they don't always do an excellent job of creating appropriate test conditions.&nbsp; It's not that they're "bad" it's that I guess I, or others, might have higher standards.&nbsp; I've caught a few flaws here and there but not many big ones that would invalidate their final conclusion.&nbsp; They may have derived that conclusion incorrectly but, at least they aren't perpetuating a misunderstanding. </p><p>I don't get to watch the show enough even though I do happen to enjoy it whenever I see it.&nbsp; I'm not big of most "TV" in general.&nbsp; Discovery and the History channel are also starting to get on my nerves with all the garbage UFO/Bigfoot/Ghost/Watch-us-blow-up-something crap they're putting on there.&nbsp; Mythbusters is a good show - The rest of those copycat shows are just bad programming.</p><p>So far, I haven't seen an error that incensed me enough to post on their forums.&nbsp; Yet.. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="1">I put on my robe and wizard hat...</font> </div>

 

[brandbll]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>I like Mythbusters but, they don't always do an excellent job of creating appropriate test conditions.&nbsp; It's not that they're "bad" it's that I guess I, or others, might have higher standards.&nbsp; I've caught a few flaws here and there but not many big ones that would invalidate their final conclusion.&nbsp; They may have derived that conclusion incorrectly but, at least they aren't perpetuating a misunderstanding. I don't get to watch the show enough even though I do happen to enjoy it whenever I see it.&nbsp; I'm not big of most "TV" in general.&nbsp; Discovery and the History channel are also starting to get on my nerves with all the garbage UFO/Bigfoot/Ghost/Watch-us-blow-up-something crap they're putting on there.&nbsp; Mythbusters is a good show - The rest of those copycat shows are just bad programming.So far, I haven't seen an error that incensed me enough to post on their forums.&nbsp; Yet.. <br />Posted by a_lost_packet_</DIV></p><p>Both channels have taken a huge dive in the quality of content.&nbsp; I am also getting real sick of the paranormal crap they constantly play on there.&nbsp; This constant ghost and UFO crap is ridiculous!&nbsp; Not to mention some of their reality shows.&nbsp; Ice Road Truckers?&nbsp; GAG!&nbsp; Extreme Logging?&nbsp; Give me a break!&nbsp; They are all cheap rip offs of <em>Deadliest Catch</em>,&nbsp;and that's just what they are, cheap and crappy.&nbsp;&nbsp;And how about History channel goes back to playing a majority of doumentaries that are actually worth watching.&nbsp; I flipped over to the History Channel last night and what did they have?&nbsp; <em>Nostradamous: 2012</em>&nbsp; WTF!?!?!?!?</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="3">You wanna talk some jive? I'll talk some jive. I'll talk some jive like you've never heard!</font></p> </div>