There is a problem with electric companies determining how much solar power you can produce. They don't want to buy it, especially at prices set by the government to encourage private home owners to install it.
What we need is a group that is looking at engineering solutions to the overall societal problem of needing to electrify just about everything, and still provide reliable electric power to those things. Then, proper policies can be set on who can and can't do what to achieve that overall objective. Right now, we are having politicians make policies that are too often actually counter-productive to getting us to where we intend to be.
Part of the problem with homeowners getting to install solar is that it is very expensive to do by just paying for it straight-out, and so it is subsidized. But that subsidy comes with rules that are politically set to favor installers and electric companies.
It seems to me that the optimum system is going to involve mostly locally generated power during the day, and grid delivered power during the nights (or blizzards or storm aftermaths). Presently, homeowners who lose grid connections also lose their access to the power generated by the solar cells on their own property. That tends to make people less interested in getting solar power. They are essentially only letting the electric company use their real estate for an offset to their electric bills. If the company can't get the electrical power from their cells, the they don't want the residents to be able to use it, either. That actually means that a home with a lot of solar cells would also install an emergency generator for when the grid goes down.
And, if we really do get most of our energy uses to be electrically powered, the grid may be overloading and go down rather frequently. That is not going to help getting people to agree to give up fuel powered equipment (cars, stoves, home heating, etc.) And, it will not help getting politicians reelected who favor converting everything to electric power.
A lot of the hesitation on acceptance and the political push back comes from people not trusting the advocates to be smart enough or even honest about what the future will be like if we all just do what they say we should do. What we need is an actual demonstration, with transparent costs and benefits - not introduction subsidies that are planned to go away as soon as the masses start following the early adopters.