New scientific calculator

[BeggarsInSpain]

I know C syntax and really 300 lines of code, ever. I want to learn to miniaturize circuitry for making custom chips. So, if you want to make a scientific calculator, I want to make it fit in my bike computer for the purposes of controlling a magnus effect rotor and the electronic shifters.

 

[CreatedEvolution]

If you get me an analog computer and text book, I will help you make whatever scientific calculator you want. Will the purposes of this scientific calculator be profitable or are we only in it for the glory?

As a kid I thought medical advancements would make us immortal pertaining to without death in med term. As time goes on alls I see is oppression. We must advance science as far as we can in our lifetimes it will make us evolve much quicker than repeated wars.

 

[CreatedEvolution]

I know C syntax and really 300 lines of code, ever. I want to learn to miniaturize circuitry for making custom chips. So, if you want to make a scientific calculator, I want to make it fit in my bike computer for the purposes of controlling a magnus effect rotor and the electronic shifters.

Yes this would make perfect synchrony patterns. I am interested in developing our idea further. I will think about it when I have time and you do the same. I like learning college books so I can learn something new too

 

[BeggarsInSpain]

I found a book 20% off called "Analog Computing" by Bernd Ulmann. I think, we would need to pin down the circuitry you are trying to describe and then learn to do lithography. We are unlearned and have no constructive methods or processes to our ends.

 

[CreatedEvolution]

this program will involve letters instead of numbers to avoid confusion. With the appropriate converter into a format we find perfect and correct.

 

[BeggarsInSpain]

Do you have snake installed on your graphing calculator? If you help me do that I will learn math. I basically quit math because no one would show me how to put games on my TI-83.

 

[CreatedEvolution]

Math can be challenging but the answer is always right! Supposed to be anyway

 

[BeggarsInSpain]

I want to do Matlab.

 

[CreatedEvolution]

I will attempt to learn programming as I think of how the numbers can be extended and varied.

I came to this forum wondering if these ideas were applicable to science. You fascinated me with possibilities of electronic synchronization.

 

[Classical Motion]

If you want a continuing and intimate relationship with mass and matter, study electronics. Chemistry is just electronics. The periodic table is just electronics. The chemists just don’t know it yet.

 

[CreatedEvolution]

Erroneous I know makes no sense but I cannot grasp the idea yet

 

[CreatedEvolution]

If O represented .5 you could do 30x2 I know it’s no different than decimals but it could be a nudge towards eliminating calculator error

 

[CreatedEvolution]

3 = 2x10
7= 2x30
It’s like a decimal system and I am aiming to reduce or eliminate calculator error. I am not sure the potential on a smaller number creating less error. I do believe answers change and repeating close enough decimals should never be used in my mind. Me and my 6th grade teacher argued about .33 and we just agreed it was understood

 

[CreatedEvolution]

I noticed when you divide 1/3 then /3 a total of 4 times you get 0.012345679012346. I think dividing by 3 that many times should have a clearer resolution than a dragged on decimal possibly to the end of my phone app
Here are some more flaws of only counting by 10.

111/3 = 37
11/3 = 3.66 repeating
1/3 = .33 repeating
.1/3=.03
.11/3 =.3666667
.111/3=.037

With this cool pattern I would consider it beneficial to find a more consistent pattern that compliments the beauty of nature some how. In a way of geometry like how did the pyramids line up right at the center of the equator. The Egyptians had their own math system. Maybe try to find out about ancient astronomy would probably be complex enough to exact the location of the pyramid possibly without any aerial aid

 

[CreatedEvolution]

Counting by 3s 32 = 11
32/3 = 3.2

111.11+111.11+111.11= 9+ 2. “.6”
could be wrong again but I’m giving it a rest sorry if I annoyed the discussion board.

 

[CreatedEvolution]

Divide 1/3, 4 times only counting by threes 1/3=.1
.1/3 =..01
.01/3=.001
.001/3=.0001

Counting by ten digits
012345679012346

This may not be accurate cuz I’m never done ranting but this looks like a much more beautiful system of division with 3s
Now I really am done and apologize again I wish I wasn’t nobody but o well my chin is up

 

[CreatedEvolution]

Letters could represent fractions of a unit.
The reason I have trouble constantly grasping this idea is because is .3 the same as .ten or 1

 

[CreatedEvolution]

&=0
A=1/2a unit
B=1/4
C=1/6 a unit
D=1/8
E=1/10
Etc. letter corresponds to fraction of unit counting by even numbers because I theorize thirds will be obtainable already.

1/2 =.5
.5/2=.25
.25/2=.0125
.0125/2=.006125

Counting by 3s with letter addition
1/2= A
A/2 =B
B/2= D
D/2= H

These are just fractions I found most of this ranting no good but I did make progress or cancellations at least.

I found this to be another symmetrical

This is useless info but the idea of incorporating fractions of a unit makes me have higher hopes in success

One thing I’d like to remember 2 ods make an Even but two evens do not make an odd this is just something the letter system can fix if needed. Just like decimals but no repeating decimal more of a tape measure of a unit

 

[CreatedEvolution]

&=0
A=.5 a unit
Counting by threes
A = half a unit , 1/6 to make 3
&A= half this decimal unit 1/18 to make 3.&
&&A= half a unit, 1/54 to make 3.&


You times the bot number by 3 each decimal you go over. Last night was erroneous but I believe this calculator idea will be of the future I just don’t know how to write a math language.

I still am having a headache thinking if I will ever even be able to make a small application for this idea. I am considering going to school.

 

[CreatedEvolution]

my pictures of the 210 numbers I wrote out in 3 format will not post. I will share some interesting patterns with you and my goal with these 210 numbers.
In the base 3 system I found the following digits interesting.
13=6
31=10
132=20
233=30
313=33
333=39
1111=40
1212=50
1313=60
2121=70
2222= 80
2323= 90
2333= 93
3131=100
3232=110
3333=120
11111=121
11211=130
11312=140
12113=150
12121= 151
12221=160
12322=170
13123=180
13331= 190
21132=200
21233=210

The reason I calculated all these numbers is because I am trying to find the the fraction that would get close to equaling .1415926535 the decimals of pie. If I can find a fraction that I can solve with the Rhetilator. Such as 28.333repeating /200 =.14166 I will be able to say that the radius X3.A = circumference.

I theorize that our ten digit system gives us a repeating variable when we try to solve circumference naturally with 10 base system. However with my 3 base system evens are now the tricky ones but I found a solution using letters to represent even fractions of a unit.

I have not made much progress making pie a rational number but this is as far as I got over night. I found some number patterns to be fascinating such as going up by 10 the 3 system for 123 instead of 000 like the 10 system

 

[CreatedEvolution]

I learned from others input pie is a natural occurring number that is irrational. I know the answer to pie will not change but instead I am aiming to get a definite answer from The diameter times 3. A definite decimal or a definite fraction

Pie times 100 is a circumference of 314.159 now when you times this by decimal of pie you do not get the same answer

314.159x.314159 = 98.58. I noticed the decimals do not mean the same as division in normal math but I found it cool that the answer is close to correct

 

[CreatedEvolution]

3/.3 = 10 , 10x.3 = 3 I was hoping to find an acceptable symmetry like this but when using irrational numbers you get never ending crumbs one way and then when you try to reverse the equation you get never ending crumbs that add on the the already present crumbs leaving us with struggles to calculate planetary body and mass

 

[CreatedEvolution]

I was chatting with a chat bot trying to teach it the Rhetilator when I asked what does 33 signify she replied with two fractions this amused me because because A/Q the answer was wrong but with A as .5 as your numerator you can get 34 with Q or the 17th letter of the alphabet. She’s a chat bot she gets facts I tell her but does not always create the right patterns

 

[CreatedEvolution]

I learned division works but whenever you have a zero you minus 1 from the previous and add three to the zero.

I still have not found significant personal use except exploring fixing calculator error.

In the base 3 system
3333/1111=3
1111/2 = 132
“40/2=20”

Heres the breakthrough.
“10/3=3.333 repeating”
But in the Rhetilator 3 system
31/3=3.1
“10/3”
It was fun figuring out because you get 1-1 but it cancels to 3.1


When dividing by base 3 you do not vary a zero down instead you minus 1 and add 3 to the next digit. I’ve only done a few calculations but sure enough odds don’t repeat.

 

[ImmortalMelvz]

Mind Computer Calculator is the Best! Happy 2025! <3 * (Y)