New scientific calculator

[CreatedEvolution]

My theory that the decimals of pie will be a square or Cuberoot fraction is backed by the square root of 201 does not repeat and goes on forever according to my occasionally mistaken ai pal.

Since the square root of 201 is 14.17744 without repeating this suspects that the square root of 201 could be used times 1/100 would solve the decimal places.

I know this is gibberish math but I figure if I can stumble upon the pi digits elsewhere I may have enough clues to pick a solid number where to end pi even tho it’s natural phenomenon

After reviewing the square root of 201 I’m not sure it is irrational

 

[CreatedEvolution]

Square root of 201 = 14.17744 irrational
Square root of 20101 = 141.777 irrational
Square root of 2010101 = 1417.8 irrational
Square root of 201010101=14177.8 irrational

In my personal challenge I am trying to remember if a lot of square roots are irrational without repeating. I do not recall tho

 

[Hevach]

Most square roots are irrational. That does *not* mean all irrational numbers are square roots or can be represented by some function of square roots. They are turtles and tortoises.

The square root of any integer which is not a perfect square is irrational. From 1 to 100 there are ten numbers with rational square roots (1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100) and 90 without. There are 11 more perfect squares from 101 to 1,000 and 889 more integers with irrational square roots.

 

[CreatedEvolution]

I have not done my pi experiment that involves various base decimals. Besides alternate bases I want to try power fractions and combinations of squared and cubed numbers fractions

 

[CreatedEvolution]

the Romans divide the day by twenty four hours.
which can be divided by two three four six
I suggest doubling twenty four and trying forty eight
forty eight can be divided by two three four six eight sixteen
or perhaps we could try a number that ends in zero divisble by twenty four such as one hundred and twenty
one hundred and twenty is divisible by
two and sixty
three and forty
five and twenty four
six and twenty
eight and fifteen
ten and twelve

or perhaps there will be a number divisible by seven as well. oh my gosh the number three hundred and thirty six was the one. it was similar to my guess of three hundred and sixty

three hundred and thirty six
seven and forty eight
two and one hundred and sixty eight
three and one hundred and twelve
four and eighty four

my number keys are broken so sorry for the typed words. long story short I vote three hundred and thirty six as our base for astronomical physics

 

[CreatedEvolution]

one thousand six hundred and eighty is divisible by seven and five

 

[CreatedEvolution]

the Romans divide the day by twenty four hours.
which can be divided by two three four six
I suggest doubling twenty four and trying forty eight
forty eight can be divided by two three four six eight sixteen
or perhaps we could try a number that ends in zero divisble by twenty four such as one hundred and twenty
one hundred and twenty is divisible by
two and sixty
three and forty
five and twenty four
six and twenty
eight and fifteen
ten and twelve

or perhaps there will be a number divisible by seven as well. oh my gosh the number three hundred and thirty six was the one. it was similar to my guess of three hundred and sixty

three hundred and thirty six
seven and forty eight
two and one hundred and sixty eight
three and one hundred and twelve
four and eighty four

my number keys are broken so sorry for the typed words. long story short I vote three hundred and thirty six as our base for astronomical physics

five and sixty seven point two or in that base point one six eight. because three hundred and thirty six decimals make up one unit. point two of three hundred and thirty six is one hundred is one hundred and sixty eight
two tenths of three hundred and thirty six.
I predict very low repeating numbers with base three hundred and thirty six

 

[CreatedEvolution]

if two out of ten is represented as point two then base three hundred and thirty six
eleven out of three hundred and thirty six would be point eleven. but it would be a single digit because we are trying to eliminate repeating decimals with the best base possible

 

[CreatedEvolution]

I propose using roman numerals for the three hundred and thirty six numbers each number can have a line above and below to simply reading roman numerals

 

[CreatedEvolution]

I know C syntax and really 300 lines of code, ever. I want to learn to miniaturize circuitry for making custom chips. So, if you want to make a scientific calculator, I want to make it fit in my bike computer for the purposes of controlling a magnus effect rotor and the electronic shifters.

i already learned how to do division on base three. I am guessing we need three hundred and thirty six numbers for the best calculation.

I would like three hundred and thirty six single digits that can be represent as such and spaced as such elevenonehundredthirtysix each line is signifying one digit


we could separate each number by alternating between lower and upper lines threethreesixoneoneseven that represents how numbers could be divided for going up to three hundred and thirty six numbers

I apologize for no numbers. my keys are broken and I'm waiting on a new phone

the program could be a button that toggles the two or a simple hot key..
I'm still working on this but still not solid application

 

[CreatedEvolution]

My theory that the decimals of pie will be a square or Cuberoot fraction is backed by the square root of 201 does not repeat and goes on forever according to my occasionally mistaken ai pal.

Since the square root of 201 is 14.17744 without repeating this suspects that the square root of 201 could be used times 1/100 would solve the decimal places.

I know this is gibberish math but I figure if I can stumble upon the pi digits elsewhere I may have enough clues to pick a solid number where to end pi even tho it’s natural phenomenon

After reviewing the square root of 201 I’m not sure it is irrational

one thing I realized about two zero one is that is not really supposed to be the second digit of two hundred there if we did not use zero after nine that it is the start of two hundred

such as if ten was a single digit then one hundred would be two digits. perhaps eliminating imaginary zeros will change the answer to the decimal of the square root of two zero one

if one hundred and one should be the real start to the three digits not one hundred then maybe it will effect the decimals of pie