New scientific calculator

Page 5 - Seeking answers about space? Join the Space community: the premier source of space exploration, innovation, and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier.
Nov 4, 2024
359
28
185
a tenth would look like this in base 336.

.33201 201 repeating. however i believe only tenths and fifths repeat.

my first attempt at the second digit decimals.

.01 = 1/112896

.167168 = 1/56280

28140 / 336 = 83.75
.75 x 336 = 252
[U].[/U][S]0[/S][U]83[/U][S]252 [/S] = 1/28140
[U].zero[/U][S]eightythree[/S][U]twofiftytwo[/U]

7035/336 = 20.9375
.9375 x 336 = 315
[U].0[/U][S]20 [/S][U]315[/U] = 1/7035
.zerotwentythreefifteen


.875 x 336 = 294

..375 x 336 = 126

.1875 x 336 = 63
 
Last edited:
Nov 4, 2024
359
28
185
I like to argue with myself. I could argue ten has misled us because many fractions cannot be expressed but we have ten fingers. It is our evolution that is preventing us from evolving and finding a better more beautiful and suitable base that ten or something ending in a zero or five. I would argue that ten has enticed us but we must separate from our old ways because decimals would be much more exact even expressed in two or three base 336 decimals.

On the other hand base ten is pretty simple and imaginary zeroes can be beneficial.

my bottom line argument is that base ten cannot express 1/3, 1/6, 1/7, 1/9, 1/11, 1/12, 1/13, or 1/14

while base 336 only struggles in tenths.

My theory is if we had 12 fingers we would have never used the base 10 system. Therefore we should switch to a better base system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ImmortalMelvz

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts