We have seen off-hand remarks in flight director's updates before that were misleading or in some cases inaccurate. Bear in mind that "exiting the crater" interpreted very broadly can mean that we will go no deeper, but will begin the process of moving toward the rim and ultimately out of the crater. This could easily take weeks or months.<br /><br />The JPL web site makes clear that decision-making is still conditional, but gives a fairly clear general outline: "The investigation at an area dubbed 'Inuvik' at a target called 'Tuktoyuktuk' (named for a small village in the Canadian arctic) will likely be the rover's last in this region. The rover planning team is contemplating the next traverse which will move Opportunity around the interior of the crater, first to some outcroppings dubbed the 'Arctic Islands,' then possibly to 'Burns Cliff,' roughly 80 meters (about 262 feet) from the rover's current position."<br /><br />I think it is unlikely that the vehicle will be directed to the dunes on the floor. There is a definite risk of bogging, not so much on the dunes themselves, but on the slopes just above them, which undoubtedly consist of soft, deep soil. Unliess there is a strong reason to think that the floor area has a water story to tell (unlikely), I think it will be avoided.<br /><br />There is the issue of rover age. No doubt there are those who would like to make a quick dash to the south before instruments fail and while the mobility system is still working well. But I suspect that the consensus at JPL is that the south wall of Endurance is the best place to be for the next few months at least. There are still plenty of good data to be had there and we can compensate for the poor sun angle.