It is important to read these releases with great caution. Let me quote Squyres from the last press briefing, concerning the stratigraphy at Karatepe:<br />"...once we have gotten deep down into the stack, the appearance of the rocks has changed. Now it's still fundamentally the same kind of rock, it's got the same general sort of chemistry, it looks like it was laid down in liquid water, but it's telling us something about changing conditions as we look further into the Martian past."<br />"....it's really kinda variations on a theme....The spectral properties, the characteristics as we work our way down, fundamentally similar sorts of rocks, but it's expressing itself differently."<br /><br />Now how are we to reconcile this with the statement in the press release you linked to? It is as follows:<br />"The rover has found that chlorine and pyroxene (a signature of basaltic, or volcanic, rocks) increase in concentration with deepening layers of rock. Scientists also hope to study the dunes, or 'ripples,' visible at the bottom right of this image. These dunes show strong signatures for basalt and could further develop the history of this area of Meridiani Planum."<br /><br />I submit that the reconciliation comes in realizing that despite the reference to rocks in the second quote, this is in fact based on Mini-TES observations of the surface, not RATed rocks. It is a statement about the composition of the surface only. The surface of Endurance consists primarily of exposed rock near the rim versus primarily drift on the floor. The rock is mainly evaporite, the drift is mainly basalt. This explains the increasing pyroxene with depth.<br /><br />The important distinction is that the basalt is primarily exigenous and reflects more recent Martian history. It is the evaporite that is the older, indigenous material. I am not suggesting that there may not be basaltic rock beneath it, I am merely trying to clarify what I think has been found thus far. <br />