Newtons = grams ??? (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton_(unit) )
So, is what you really mean that a 1 gigawatt photon source reflecting perpendicularly off a surface at will impart a force equal to the downward force of a 110 gram mass sitting on a scale on Earth's surface?
Considering the subject of the thread, it seems more enlightening to say that a 1 gigawatt laser would need to shine on a one metric ton (1000 Kg) satellite for 1000 x 20 = 20,000 seconds to achieve the 20 m/s velocity change assumed to be needed to deorbit the satellite. That is about 5.5 hours of continuous laser light shining on the satellite.
Still doesn't seem like such a bad idea until you ask how you would get that much energy into another satellite to make it capable of emitting that laser beam for that long. And ask what 5.5 gigawatt-hours of energy would do to the satellite if not all of it gets reflected and x% gets absorbed.
Caveat: I have not checked Bill's conversion from gigawatts of photon energy to momentum impulse at a reflecting surface.
So, is what you really mean that a 1 gigawatt photon source reflecting perpendicularly off a surface at will impart a force equal to the downward force of a 110 gram mass sitting on a scale on Earth's surface?
Considering the subject of the thread, it seems more enlightening to say that a 1 gigawatt laser would need to shine on a one metric ton (1000 Kg) satellite for 1000 x 20 = 20,000 seconds to achieve the 20 m/s velocity change assumed to be needed to deorbit the satellite. That is about 5.5 hours of continuous laser light shining on the satellite.
Still doesn't seem like such a bad idea until you ask how you would get that much energy into another satellite to make it capable of emitting that laser beam for that long. And ask what 5.5 gigawatt-hours of energy would do to the satellite if not all of it gets reflected and x% gets absorbed.
Caveat: I have not checked Bill's conversion from gigawatts of photon energy to momentum impulse at a reflecting surface.