Not much in terms of concrete planning decisions, no. But some interesting details nonetheless.<br /><br />Gerstenmeier opened today with a new version of the "it didn't go so bad" story. The ET has 4192 pounds of foam, and 1.2 pounds were liberated on STS-114.<br /><br />He said that based on the preliminary reports has has received so far, he did not forsee at the moment any "major rework" of the tanks before STS-121. Options included removing and reapplying the PAL ramps wholesale, especially if they had previously experienced small repairs. Removing the PAL ramp completely or applying mesh netting are long term options to be implemented only after at least one more instrumented tank has flown. <br /><br />Gerst thinks that the five areas probably all had different mechanisms causing foam loss, which will need to be addressed. Besides the PAL ramp, the ice/frost ramp losses and the divots near the bipod were also concerns. Suspicion with the bipod acreage losses focusses on wiring near the foam allowing cryo ingestion. <br /><br />The Tiger team is working on root causes right now (with an emphasis on the engineering, not process or management errors). That should conclude in a few days. The next step is to decide what to do with future tanks. And then decide on what to do in the long term. He expects the tiger team to wrap up in a few weeks, and let the 5 engineering teams also working on this continue.<br /><br />The NDE records of the PAL ramp are being checked. There are some points of varying density, but he didn't conclude anything from that. He was quite frank about saying that the NDE was still not mature, and NASA is still working out how to use and interpret it best.