Thinking outside the books

[CreatedEvolution]

Are a lot of our texts dated before the internet came out? I think we need to think outside the box on all theories prior to high speed internet. I believe the internet makes knowledge at your fingertips and it is much easier to make observations.

This thread is for theories I think should be reconsidered.

1. Gravity suspension around the sun
Alternate theory could be a chemical balance theory involving heat ice gravity and EMFs

2.moon has magma core
How big does a rock have to be for gravity to crush the center to magma like earth. There is evidence of volcanic activity on the moon

3. Ocean levels balance by magma coming out on land side or water side giving us a balanced sea level by the magma core

Any theories you think are old enough to be re thought about I’d love to hear and learn. Like life on that planets was thought to be slim but now it’s considered endless planets in the habitable zone for life.

 

[Catastrophe]

Reply to Question 1:

"1. Gravity suspension around the sun
Alternate theory could be a chemical balance theory involving heat ice gravity and EMFs".

Google Search

Reply to Question 2:

2.moon has magma core
How big does a rock have to be for gravity to crush the center to magma like earth. There is evidence of volcanic activity on the moon

Google Search

Answer to Question 3:

3. Ocean levels balance by magma coming out on land side or water side giving us a balanced sea level by the magma core

3. Ocean levels balance by magma coming out on land side or water side giving us a balanced sea level by the magma core - Google Suche

also

Planetary ocean theory

I know some of my theories are impossible however I like to post them to make more brain activity. This is a theory about the 6 inch increase in sea level in 100 years and 20 inch increase in 1000 years My theory is that if sea levels are remaining relatively the same then rain water will not...

forums.space.com

But the water pressure puts the continent under compression and will push the two sides of an ocean apart (putting the oceanic plate underneath under tension). In total, however, these forces are far too small to have any impact on plate tectonics.

Cat

 

[CreatedEvolution]

4. Giant impact hypothesis
-suggested in the 70s for moon formation

Why do I want to refvink this is because it came out before the 2000s when the internet widely releases knowledge. Only a select few would have looked at all the data to come up with this hypothesis.

I know my theory is probably more wrong however. With my chemistry theory. The black holes and stars generate emf currents where matter accumulates for the nebular theory to take place. I also think planets are formed from material given off by the sun “or decay” and moons are given off by planets. This length of time would explain why we have never seen a partial moon formed.

Could the rings around Saturn be from rock matter being vaporized to the atmosphere? That is what I suggest planets give off matter from their cores that accumulate to moons over great periods of time.

This theory supports the nebular theory where there should be accumulation of matter for a star to form.

I kind of contradicted myself thinking all stars originate by a-black hole but I have evolved the theory to stars spread wider and wider due to emf currents making decaying matter accumulate in certain spots.

This theory is saying black holes and stellar EMF currents are the main factor of star formation. And the moon is similar where our atmosphere escapes little by little and accumulates to a moon

 

[CreatedEvolution]

5. the universe is eons old. it cannot be calculated.

I noticed the age of the universe and the furthest galaxy have a lot in common. if we are judging time by the length of light we are vastly mistaken.

I propose new galaxies can form without a big bang and we are no where near right when we guess the universe is fourteen billion years old. I would say that is us refusing to let go of not being the center of the universe.. we have to gradually change to being ants not gods.

 

[CreatedEvolution]

I feel like being mean cause I'm crabby.. durrrrr we found the edge of the vast universe

 

[CreatedEvolution]

I feel like being mean cause I'm crabby.. durrrrr we found the edge of the vast universe

we might fall off into nothingness

 

[Catastrophe]

. . . . . . we found the edge of the vast universe

we might fall off into nothingness

Does this exemplify cognitive dissonance?

• Definition: Wikipedia defines cognitive dissonance as a state where people unknowingly hold conflicting cognitions.

If the Universe is "all there is", then what would you fall off into?
It must be an illogical question?

Yes. It is illogical because there is no "Universe" which corresponds to any form of reality.

The only type of universe, is the observable universe. One cannot fall off the edge of this because it is not materal. The limit of an observable universe is simply by the limitation of the speed of light. The limit of an observable universe is simply the distance beyond which light (from there) has not had the time to reach the observer.

Thus, beyond the limit of your observable universe, is still within the observable limit of another observer. It is as material as your observable universe is to you. Not some fantasy of a bottomless pit, somehow "outside" "The Universe". Just semantic inconsistency.

Cat

 

[Catastrophe]

In case some explanation is required:

Observable universe - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The observable universe is a spherical region of the universe consisting of all matter that can be observed from Earth;

Of course, "from Earth" is unnecessarily limiting.

If, in the future, humankind reaches alpha Centauri, then the observable universe of humans there will be centered on alpha Centauri, not on Earth.

If there are beings elsewhere, of which we are, of course, currently unaware, then they would correctly consider themselves at the centre of their observable universes.

Cat