Ultraviolet & Infrared Light...

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow">It isn't. A beam of light isn't destroyed in a black hole, it is just trapped there because it can't move fast enough to get out.</font><br /><br />How sure are you that the photons are trapped, rather than converted to x-rays?

 

[nacnud]

Very.

 

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow">Very.</font><br /><br />Very? Sorry, I'm not convinced that photons are an exception to Particle Annihilation, photons most certainly do not get annihilated, but that doesn't mean that photons are impervious to Gravity, (G).

 

[nacnud]

Photons are not impervious to gravity; they get trapped in the black hole because of it. <br /><br />What are you trying to say/ask?<br />

 

[jatslo]

<font color="orange">What are you trying to say/ask (nacnud)?</font><br /><br />I already said it. Is the following ball light, and why is the center mass transparent?<br /><br /><font color="yellow">Two gold nuclei collide in the center of this image, perhaps creating a new state of matter called the quark-gluon plasma. The lines spreading out from the center are the paths of the resulting shrapnel, as recorded by the STAR detector at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. Credit: Brookhaven National Laboratory<br /></font><br /><br />Gluon Plasma

 

[jurgens]

jatslo, you broke the thread.<br /><br />Also in that image, the reason the center is black is because there are no detectors in that image to detect whatever is created during the collision of the two gold nuclei.<br /><br />Also what the heck is ball light? Jatslo, do you even know what that is an image of? Did you even READ the article or decide to do a little study on particle accelerators and how data is gotten from them?

 

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow">jatslo, you broke the thread. <br /><br />Also in that image, the reason the center is black is because there are no detectors in that image to detect whatever is created during the collision of the two gold nuclei.</font><br /><br />What, WHAT?? What do you mean, I broke the thread? These are supposed to be some kind of scratches?<br /><br />Are you sure? <br /><br /><font color="yellow">Also what the heck is ball light? Jatslo, do you even know what that is an image of? Did you even READ the article or decide to do a little study on particle accelerators and how data is gotten from them?</font><br /><br />Did you forget to take your medication?<br />I meant ball plasma, or ball lightning.<br />

 

[jurgens]

Jatslo, you broke the thread by posting that gigantic link, it screwed up the formatting of the forum.<br /><br />Also You didn't say ball of light? ohh ball of plasma or lightning right? Nope its neither of those, someone else should correct me if im wrong, but im pretty damned sure that those streaks you see are the paths taken by particles that are created from the collision of the two gold nuclei.

 

[nacnud]

Jatslo, you can fix the formatting like this<br /><br /> title

 

[jatslo]

I fixed it, the link wrapped just fine on my PC.

 

[nacnud]

Thanks, my scroll wheel doesn't do sideways.

 

[jurgens]

steve, he makes my brain want to explode itself.

 

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow">anti-particle</font><br /><br />anti-particle? Okay, if you say so?!?!?!?

 

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow">The ignorance among so many</font><br /><br />You spend a great deal of time researching ignorance; I wonder why?!?!?!?!?!?!

 

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow">There's no point trying to work with someone like him</font><br /><br />How many Ad Hominem Deletions does this individual get before his IP is banned completely, CalliArcale?

 

[jatslo]

Apparently the following map is a snap shot from two observatories, in which WMAP produced clearer snapshots. Temperature variations through microwave detection, where red and blue are the colors of choice. I picked this two snap shots as comparison analysis, as in time-lapse photography. If you look closely, you can see the changing universe, and the blue areas will probably get bigger as the universe expands.<br /><br /><font color="yellow">The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) team has made the first detailed full-sky map of the oldest light in the universe. It is a "baby picture" of the universe. Colors indicate "warmer" (red) and "cooler" (blue) spots. The oval shape is a projection to display the whole sky; similar to the way the globe of the earth can be projected as an oval.<br /><br />The microwave light captured in this picture is from 379,000 years after the Big Bang, over 13 billion years ago: the equivalent of taking a picture of an 80-year-old person on the day of their birth.</font><br /><br />http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm.html

 

[jatslo]

Well it looks like X-rays dissipate, because I cannot find a sky map, and the sky maps that I found are deep views of the northern and southern hemispheres. X-rays are not as widely dispersed as gamma waves, and microwaves, meaning that x-ray emissions appear to be localized events.

 

[nexium]

Hi Jatslo: You are likely correct about mixing paint. The color of paint is the result of colors of EM that were reflected rather than absorbed.<br /> When the color is the result of mixing monocromatic light, the rules are different. The theory of light mixing has been tested on several billion TV sets and computer screens. There are red phosphors and blue phosphors and green phosphors which light up when the beam of electrons strike that phosphor (same as the three colors in the tail of the NBC peacock) Mixed in the correct proportion they produce the white you get on your color TV when it is showing a black and white movie or program. If the proportions are off a bit the white part of the picture has a pastel color.<br /> I agree the insults were undesirable.<br /><br /> Sir Conan Doyal taught a non-useful hypothesis in his Sherlock Holmes stories as we can rarely be even reasonably sure we have illiminated any of the possibilities, nor can we be sure we have concidered all the possibilities. Neil

 

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow">The color of paint is the result of colors of EM that were reflected rather than absorbed. When the color is the result of mixing monocromatic light, the rules are different. The theory of light mixing has been tested on several billion TV sets and computer screens. There are red phosphors and blue phosphors and green phosphors which light up when the beam of electrons strike that phosphor (same as the three colors in the tail of the NBC peacock) Mixed in the correct proportion they produce the white you get on your color TV when it is showing a black and white movie or program. If the proportions are off a bit the white part of the picture has a pastel color.<br /></font><br /><br />That makes since. I thought that maybe there was a patent on the original spectrum, so a new spectrum was invented. I don't have a problem with the red, green, and blue primary colors of waves/particles. Basically, I was more concerned about finite choices, and I was trying to get someone to say infinite, in which CalliArcale finally quoted as follows:<br /><br /><font color="yellow">There are theoretically an infinite number of frequencies, so if you define "color" as "a specific frequency", then there are a theoretically infinite number of colors.</font><br /><br />CalliArcale Citation<br /><br />I originally opened with "Ultraviolet & Infrared Light", because I wanted to debate Gamma Rays, which fall within this color scheme.<br /><br /><font color="yellow">Sir Conan Doyal taught a non-useful hypothesis in his Sherlock Holmes stories as we can rarely be even reasonably sure we have illiminated any of the possibilities, nor can we be sure we have concidered all the possibilities. Neil</font><br /><br />If we consider how insignificant we are in comparison to the universe, the

 

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow"><b>Uses:</b><br /><br />Since Röntgen's discovery that X-rays can identify bony structures, X-rays have been developed for their use in medical imaging. Radiology is a specialised field of medicine that employs radiography and other techniques for diagnostic imaging. Indeed, this is probably the most common use of X-ray technology.<br /><br />The use of X-rays are especially useful in the detection of pathology of the skeletal system, but are also useful for detecting some disease processes in soft tissue. Some notable examples are the very common chest X-ray, which can be used to identify lung diseases such as pneumonia, lung cancer or pulmonary oedema, and the abdominal X-ray, which can detect ileus (blockage of the intestine), free air (from visceral perforations) and free fluid (in ascites). In some cases, the use of X-rays is debatable, such as gallstones (which are rarely radiopaque) or kidney stones (which are often visible, but not always). Also, Traditional plain X-rays pose very little use in the imaging of soft tissues such as the brain or muscle. Imaging alternatives for soft tissues are computed axial tomography (CAT or CT scanning), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound.<br /><br />X-rays are also used in "real-time" procedures such as angiography or contrast studies of the hollow organs (e.g. barium enema of the small or large intestine) using fluoroscopy. Angioplasty, medical interventions of the arterial system, rely heavily on X-ray-sensitive contrast to identify potentially treatable lesions.<br /><br />Radiotherapy, a curative medical intervention, now used almost exclusively for cancer, employs higher energies of radiation.<br /></font><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray <br /><br />X-rays are primarily utilized in medicine.

 

[najab]

A question: WTF, mate?

 

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow"><b>Uses:</b><br /><br />A microwave oven uses a magnetron microwave generator to produce microwaves at a frequency of approximately 2.45 GHz for the purpose of cooking food. Microwaves cook food by causing molecules of water and other compounds to vibrate. The vibration creates heat which warms the food. Since organic matter is made up primarily of water, food is easily cooked by this method.<br /> <br />Microwaves are used in communication satellite transmissions because microwaves pass easily through the earth's atmosphere with less interference than longer wavelengths. There is also much more bandwidth in the microwave spectrum than in the rest of the radio spectrum.<br /><br />Radar also uses microwave radiation to detect the range, speed, and other characteristics of remote objects.<br /><br />Wireless LAN protocols, such as Bluetooth and the IEEE 802.11g and b specifications, also use microwaves in the 2.4 GHz ISM band, although 802.11a uses an ISM band in the 5 GHz range. Licensed long-range (up to about 25 km) Wireless Internet Access services can be found in many countries (but not the USA) in the 3.5–4.0 GHz range.<br /><br />Cable TV and Internet access on coax cable as well as broadcast television use some of the lower microwave frequencies. Some cellphone networks also use the lower microwave frequencies.<br /><br />Microwaves can be used to transmit power over long distances, and post-World War II research was done to examine possibilities. NASA worked in the 1970s and early 1980s to research the possibilities of using Solar Power Satellite (SPS) systems with large solar arrays that would beam power down to the Earth's surface via microwaves.<br /><br />A maser is a device similar to a laser, except that it works at microwave frequencies.<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave<br /></font>/safety_wrapper>

 

[jatslo]

With respect to particle annihilation, I am curious if the ejected masses are balls of plasma that dissipate, or fade away, and if dissipate is the same as decay?<br /><br />Are you Australian? Better?

 

[najab]

When particles and antiparticles meet the annhilation is <b>total</b> - there is NO MASS left to eject.

 

[jatslo]

I thought we agreed that alpha and beta particles are ejected, and that these particles have both masses, and charges. I want to know if these alpha/beta particles dissipate, and if dissipate is the same as decay?