Updated Wikipedia Article on Gravitational Time Dilation

[kmarinas86]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation<br /><br />Most of the edits were done by me. 4 days of revision have taken place since this page was last tagged. <br /><br />The tagger hasn't made any comment since<br />23:12, 11 December 2005<br />http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gravitational_time_dilation&action=history

 

[telfrow]

<i>The factual accuracy of part of this article is disputed.<br /><br />The dispute is about Mischaracterization of Schwarzschild radial coordinate and several other misstatements.</i><br /><br /><img src="/images/icons/laugh.gif" /><br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <strong><font color="#3366ff">Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will to strive, to seek, to find and not to yeild.</font> - <font color="#3366ff"><em>Tennyson</em></font></strong> </div>

 

[yevaud]

<i>This article needs to be cleaned up to conform to a higher standard of quality.</i><br /><br /><img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" /><br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Differential Diagnosis:  </em>"<strong><em>I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are</em></strong>."<br /> </p> </div>

 

[kmarinas86]

The tagger hasn't made any comment since <br />23:12, 11 December 2005 <br />http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gravitational_time_dilation&action=history <br /><br />In all probability, he is probably deaf, d e a f, to all the revisions that have take place that past 3 days.<br /><br />That's why the signal is still up there<br /><br />Why not investigate the 98 edits I made since then?<br />http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gravitational_time_dilation&limit=100&action=history

 

[kmarinas86]

This is how the article looked like before he made his last comment:<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gravitational_time_dilation&oldid=30954681<br /><br />He hasn't made any comments recently, and in all probability he will decide to take down that signal sometime from now.

 

[yevaud]

S'ok. I recently helped save an article there from deletion (I'm the very last comment).<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mr._Butch<br /><br />So I'm not entirely unfamiliar with how Wiki works. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Differential Diagnosis:  </em>"<strong><em>I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are</em></strong>."<br /> </p> </div>

 

[aliw]

Interestingly there is also this article:<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woo_Woo<br /><br />Maybe it's factual accuracy should be disputed to... <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" />

 

[5stone10]

I got a fix for you:<br /><br /><br />"Quite too often, the following formulaic Newtonian approximations are (wrongly) used to describe gravitational shift's relationship with acceleration and distance."<br /><br /><br />How 'bout cutting out the wordiness --<br /><br /><br />Often, these Newtonian formulae are used to justify the relationship of gravitational shift to acceleration and distance.