Vacuum in a vacuum

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Maverick3n1

Guest
Being that space is a vacuum, is there any way to make a device that would collect items in space?  Say dust particles.. If there are dust particles floating in front of you in space, is there any kind of way to create a suction type of aparatus that would suck those particles into some sort of container?
 
S

scottb50

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Being that space is a vacuum, is there any way to make a device that would collect items in space?&nbsp; Say dust particles.. If there are dust particles floating in front of you in space, is there any kind of way to create a suction type of aparatus that would suck those particles into some sort of container? <br /> Posted by Maverick3n1</DIV></p><p>Probably. All you need to do is provide a suction. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
D

derekmcd

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Being that space is a vacuum, is there any way to make a device that would collect items in space?&nbsp; Say dust particles.. If there are dust particles floating in front of you in space, is there any kind of way to create a suction type of aparatus that would suck those particles into some sort of container? <br /> Posted by Maverick3n1</DIV></p><p>Vaccuum cleaners work by creating a vortex.&nbsp; They take in a large volume of air through a small opening to create suction.&nbsp; There isn't enough of a medium in space to create a vortex of any kind.&nbsp; Would a fan work in a vaccuum?&nbsp; No.&nbsp; Same concept.&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <div> </div><br /><div><span style="color:#0000ff" class="Apple-style-span">"If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing." - Homer Simpson</span></div> </div>
 
B

billslugg

Guest
In space, where there is an absence of particles, it is not possible to make an area lower in particles. Thus no vacuum cleaner in space. (Except at extremely low values.) <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p> </p> </div>
 
M

Mee_n_Mac

Guest
Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>In space, where there is an absence of particles, it is not possible to make an area lower in particles. Thus no vacuum cleaner in space. (Except at extremely low values.) <br />Posted by <strong>billslugg</strong></DIV><br /><br />Correct.&nbsp; I think you need to fly around with the approriate "vacuum bag" (aka aerogels) like the Stardust satellite did.&nbsp; And don't worry about that Andromeda strain stuff, it can't really happ <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>-----------------------------------------------------</p><p><font color="#ff0000">Ask not what your Forum Software can do do on you,</font></p><p><font color="#ff0000">Ask it to, please for the love of all that's Holy, <strong>STOP</strong> !</font></p> </div>
 
R

R1

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Correct.&nbsp; I think you need to fly around with the approriate "vacuum bag" (aka aerogels) like the Stardust satellite did.&nbsp; And don't worry about that Andromeda strain stuff, it can't really happ <br />Posted by Mee_n_Mac</DIV></p><p><font size="2" color="#000000">how about a large funnel? or could a pinhole in the middle of a solar sail be used</font></p><p><font size="2">to collect solar wind?&nbsp;can isolated solar wind easily calm down and form hydrogen?</font></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
D

docm

Guest
<p>Start with a negatively charged panel to collect ions, most of which will carry a positive charge. Add a strong UV flood&nbsp; to ionize most of those atoms/molecules in front of it that arn't yet ionized. </p><p>Better yet surround the craft with a web of superconducting cable, create an EM field with it and inject plasma. Groups in the UK and US are working on this as a form of artificial magnetosphere.&nbsp; I call it a rudimentary shield.&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
R

R1

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Start with a negatively charged panel to collect ions, most of which will carry a positive charge. Add a strong UV flood&nbsp; to ionize most of those atoms/molecules in front of it that arn't yet ionized. Better yet surround the craft with a web of superconducting cable, create an EM field with it and inject plasma. Groups in the UK and US are working on this as a form of artificial magnetosphere.&nbsp; I call it a rudimentary shield.&nbsp; <br />Posted by docm</DIV><br /><br /><font size="2">Thank you.</font></p><p><font size="2">Here is a news article link about this:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6567709.stm</font></p><p><font size="2">I wonder if it is feasible or even possible to recombine protons and electrons from the solar wind and remake hydrogen?</font></p><p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
R

R1

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>feasible or even possible to recombine protons and electrons from the solar wind and remake hydrogen?&nbsp; <br />Posted by john1r</DIV><br /><br /><font size="2">I'm sorry, I wandered off the topic, and I think we may need more energy to do it than the hydrogen can provide.</font></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
M

michaelmozina

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Being that space is a vacuum, is there any way to make a device that would collect items in space?&nbsp; Say dust particles.. If there are dust particles floating in front of you in space, is there any kind of way to create a suction type of aparatus that would suck those particles into some sort of container? <br /> Posted by Maverick3n1</DIV></p><p>As others have already explained, interplanetary space is not actually not a pure "vacuum", in fact there is really no such thing as a pure vacuum anywhere in physical reality. &nbsp; It is however a very low density environment and it would be difficult to make something an even lower density than we already find in interplanatry space.&nbsp; Most of what we find inside interplanetary space are *moving* protons, and helium ions that flow from the sun toward the heliopshere at about a million miles per hour.&nbsp; Assuming you put up some sort of "sheet", you might in fact hope to harvest these particles.&nbsp; IMO however the "better" approach would be to tap into the current flow that is continously present and just take the electricity directly from this current flow.&nbsp;&nbsp; A long teather might do the trick. &nbsp; If you're looking to harvest helium for some reason, then capturning these solar wind ions might prove to be useful.&nbsp; </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>
 
D

derekmcd

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Most of what we find inside interplanetary space are *moving* protons, and helium ions that flow from the sun toward the heliopshere at about a million miles per hour. <br /> Posted by michaelmozina</DIV></p><p>Isn't most of the interplanetary medium comprised of mainly ionized hydrogen (i.e protons and electrons) with only a small smattering of ionized helium and the occastional few other heavier elements?&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <div> </div><br /><div><span style="color:#0000ff" class="Apple-style-span">"If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing." - Homer Simpson</span></div> </div>
 
M

michaelmozina

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Isn't most of the interplanetary medium comprised of mainly ionized hydrogen (i.e protons and electrons) with only a small smattering of ionized helium and the occastional few other heavier elements?&nbsp; <br /> Posted by derekmcd</DIV></p><p>Besides the ordinary electrons we observe in the solar wind, the three most prominant ions in the solar wind are H+1, He+2, and He+1 in that order.&nbsp; The order of abundance of the various ions is related to their charge/weight ratio.&nbsp; He+2 is therefore significantly more abundant than He+1 even though their atomic weight is very similar.&nbsp;&nbsp; We also observe the solar wind can pick up spare electrons in a cometary tail and these solar wind ions slow down as a result of picking up these extra eletrons.&nbsp; </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.