COLGeek

Cybernaut
Moderator
Still showing as a future mission on NASA's site:

 
Dec 31, 2024
19
1
15
Visit site
I also saw it scheduled for launch for launch but a month ago a saw that they where going to cancel but i also saw on a NASA page that they still going to cancel it.
 

COLGeek

Cybernaut
Moderator
I also saw it scheduled for launch for launch but a month ago a saw that they where going to cancel but i also saw on a NASA page that they still going to cancel it.
This?


Was on page I sent earlier. Not looking good for the project.
 
Aug 26, 2023
5
2
515
Visit site
They haven't scrapped the rover quite yet. It sounds like there's some chance that they'll be able to do an end run around the law, saving missions on the brink is one of the things Isaacman wants to focus on.

Unless the mission is explicitly authorized by Congress there's a hard limit on spending and strict rules against breaking contracts and Viper can afford to pay for the launch contract but once it's on the moon any operation will blow past the limit... But there's possibly room to end run the law or just ignore it and dare anyone to hold them accountable, which is something Bill Nelson isn't apt to do.
 
Aug 26, 2023
5
2
515
Visit site
Not a lot. It's always a wildcard with a new administration and he's getting mixed support from both parties ahead of confirmation hearings so he might not even get the job.

He's an advocate for science and spaceflight, which is good. But he's also said concerning things in the past about NASA selling off assets and missions to private bidders. He's also very keen on the Dragon mission to repair Hubble, which is a double edged sword. Going off half cocked with a system that's not ready yet could have disastrous results, but properly developing a capability we never fully realized with the shuttle would have immense and long lasting rewards. I'm not confident which way he's likely to go on that.

He's also coming in with an administration where accountability and rules are liable to be hypotheticals. He also didn't write most of the rules like Nelson did. That means for good or bad he's at least likely to achieve any of his ends that fit in the budget. But at the same time, he's tied to Elon Musk. Trump and Musk have had falling outs before. Another one could put Isaacman on the outs with him.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts