Oh, I just remembered something significant. The raw data is actually in black-and-white. To get a color picture, you need to download three images shot at about the same time through three different filters, process them digitally with some kind of image editing software, and combine them. This is actually how all color pictures from spacecraft are obtained. Since the filters aren't exactly the same frequencies as those to which the cones in the human eye are most sensitive, some massaging is neccesary to get a picture approximating what you'd see with the naked eye. (Indeed, many of the Cassini pictures incorporate colors which we cannot see with our eyes.) As a consequence, you might come out with pictures slightly different than those which NASA releases. It's partly a question of what you're trying to get out of the picture (speed, an approximation of what a human eye would see, or emphasis of certain frequencies for scientific purposes) and partly a question of asthetics. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p><font color="#666699"><em>"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff."</em> -- The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>