Where did the universe's magnetic fields come from?

[Atlan0001]

Gravity either isn't a force at all (thus being the omni-directional -- to the open, the opening, system -- magnitudinous fractal zooms structure of universe), or it is the sum total in one ('1'), of all the other forces (all the other interactions) (thus being the omni-directional -- to the open, the opening, system -- magnitudinous fractal zooms structure of universe (sic)).

 

[Thermoman]

Gravity either isn't a force (being the omni-directional magnitudinous fractal zooms structure of universe), or it is the sum total in one ('1'), of all the other forces (all the other interactions) (being the omni-directional magnitudinous fractal zooms structure of universe (sic)).

Incorrect , gravity is a force , proven by you need to apply force to move an object at inertia rest on Earth . If there was no force being applied between the Car and the Earth , no force would be required to push the Car !

 

[Atlan0001]

As Shrek said, "An onion has layers!" So does a "Gordian Knot"! So does the Flatland Universe of the 'Mandelbrot set'! So does the universe open up from a plane 30,000 feet above the ground of Earth to ground. It opens to ground from 30,000 feet "accelerating in expansion of the universe" inverse squarely!

 

[Thermoman]

As Shrek said, "An onion has layers!" So does a "Gordian Knot"! So does the universe open up from a plane 30,000 feet above the ground of Earth to ground. It opens to ground from 30,000 feet "accelerating in expansion of the universe" inverse squarely!

Particle F← Q←Space-Time →light →0 F

 

[COLGeek]

If the Earth was ever the other side of the Sun , constellations would vanish for this duration ,being ''washed out'' by the light !

The Sun is ''below'' the Earth relatively . If somebody lies on their back in Australia , head directed north , they don't see the Sun North at the equator , they look '''down'' to the South Pole . We all see the Sun spatial South .

The Earth sort of orbits the top of a cone relative to the nozel !

You do realize that as the Earth orbits the Sun, the night view changes throughout the year in terms of what you can see? Same for the view from north and south of the equator?

Are you trying to be silly?

 

[Classical Motion]

Zero point energy is just temporary static.

 

[Classical Motion]

If gravity is a force, it’s a very weak one. But it don’t need to be strong for the emptiness of space. The distance of this weak effect is impressive, and is what gives it it’s great effect. But that’s because of the nothingness of space, and a neutral EM, not the strength of the force. The strongest, the EM is canceled. And there is zero motion impedance in or from space. Impedance to motion comes from matter inertia, not space.

If the EM of the cosmos was lined up, gravity would cease to exist. It’s effect would be way too weak.

And there would not be any slow velocities. This cosmos wouldn’t be this cosmos with aligned or net EM. Gravity keeps cosmos matter velocities very slow.

If we knew what true inertia was, maybe we could understand how they line up in the manner they do.

I believe inertia is two accelerations. A stationary rolling acceleration, producing a secondary rotational acceleration. Producing quantum secondaries on top the stationary c roll. And introducing handedness to the cosmos.

We’ll have to really mine deep to understand inertia and gravity.

 

[Classical Motion]

The field from a single dipole is very symmetrical. The measured galactic M fields are irregular. There are superposition M fields from multiple sources. M fields have handedness. This gives that irregular field a changing collective area depending on the relevant motions of the sources.

It’s just fundamental mutual M coupling.

Photons are discreet and have E and M alignment. And photons can spin without loss of V. And can be filtered with such.

A photon(or radio) has two polarizations. Allowing us to see those irregular fields.

Remember, an M field line comes back to the source. Unless it’s cut and emitted.

E lines fade and never return. For M to return, there must be minimum M to return.

Interesting.

If you snapped it, it would radiate. (that’s what a dipole antenna does) Snapping star and planet fields can generate zillions of different radio wavelengths. But just like light, it takes heavy flux(multiple emitters) for intensity to get out into long distance. That’s why cosmos is relatively radio quit. Not enough flux.

The E is scattered, and the M is enclosed. Repulsive/Attractive.

Two opposites to make it interesting. Throw in a quantum and you have a real puzzle.

 

[Thermoman]

You do realize that as the Earth orbits the Sun, the night view changes throughout the year in terms of what you can see? Same for the view from north and south of the equator?

Are you trying to be silly?

See that is the sort of proof I believe! Ok thanks for that .

I still think the Sun is under the Earth though ?

 

[COLGeek]

See that is the sort of proof I believe! Ok thanks for that .

I still think the Sun is under the Earth though ?

See here:

Eyes on the Solar System - NASA/JPL

Explore the 3D world of the Solar System. Learn about past and future missions.

search.app

 

[Thermoman]

Zero point energy is just temporary static.

No, zero point energy is relic radiation , from time 0 to infinite years old !

 

[Classical Motion]

ok

 

[Thermoman]

See here:

Eyes on the Solar System - NASA/JPL

Explore the 3D world of the Solar System. Learn about past and future missions.

search.app

Yes the Disk but that isn't what my observations shows , I see a cone model where the Earth sits above the Sun rather than a Disk?

 

[Thermoman]

See here:

Eyes on the Solar System - NASA/JPL

Explore the 3D world of the Solar System. Learn about past and future missions.

search.app

Here is my reasoning , a person in Australia observes sunrise east, midday south , sunset west , not once do they look north to the equator ?

 

[COLGeek]

Yes the Disk but that isn't what my observations shows , I see a cone model where the Earth sits above the Sun rather than a Disk?

Have you considered that your observations are simply wrong?

 

[Thermoman]

Have you considered that your observations are simply wrong?

Yes but only because I haven't got an Australian to confirm the experiment with !

I am in England North of the Equator and at midday the Sun is Southish , so an Australian should observe Midday as Northish if the Suns path is inline with the equator .

 

[COLGeek]

Yes but only because I haven't got an Austalian to confirm the experiment with !

I am in England North of the Equator and at midday the Sun is Southish , so an Australian should observe Midday as Northish if the Suns path is inline with the equator .

Even where you are on the globe, do you notice the change in the Sun's angular position throughout the year?

Seems you may be considering a 3 dimensional relationship, over time, and making a 2 dimensional single moment in time solution

 

[COLGeek]

So. This Sun thing is another topic from the thread altogether. So, let's stay on topic, please.

 

[Thermoman]

Even where you are on the globe, do you notice the change in the Sun's angular position throughout the year?

Seems you may be considering a 3 dimensional relationship, over time, and making a 2 dimensional single moment in time solution

As far as I am aware , anywhere on the Globe the Sun rises to the left (East) and sets to the right (West) because of the left hand spin (anti-clockwise) of the Earth .

As far as I can tell , the Suns curved path could just be my own path and the Sun is always observed below the South pole way out into space.


In Australia I am predicting at Midday ish , they see the Sun above Antartica which actually below the Earth using 3d relativity .

 

[Thermoman]

So. This Sun thing is another topic from the thread altogether. So, let's stay on topic, please.

Sorry mixed up the threads .

 

[Thermoman]

ok

CBMR may also be Relic Radiation but back to topic , magnetic fields.

I think a Magnetic field is curved light of some form rather than charge related because a magnetic field is measured 0 net charge ?

Somewhere in the middle of becoming charge and being light !

 

[Classical Motion]

Light is just the skin of the charge. Light can not make a charge. Light propagation is not charge propagation. It's just a change in clothes.

 

[Thermoman]

Light is just the skin of the charge. Light can not make a charge. Light propagation is not charge propagation. It's just a change in clothes.

When light doesn't travel in a linear manner ,this produces wave energy .When light decides to chase its own tail like little stings , it becomes electricity .How else do you think we generate electricity ? We don't strip electrons from Copper like you may think ! We produce Eddies !

 

[Classical Motion]

This can't be real.

 

[Thermoman]

This can't be real.

Measure the mass of the Copper in an electrical generator , then create some electrical energy using the Copper. Then measure the mass again ,no loss of matter, all electrons in tact .