Where did the universe's magnetic fields come from?

[Classical Motion]

I have managed and supervised hydro electric generation facilities. Electricity is not charge flow...you call current. Electricity is charge alignment. The so called flow is a duty cycle of intermittent velocity, producing and average alignment. The flow has no go.

This field alignment carries the energy at near c speeds.

 

[Thermoman]

I have managed and supervised hydro electric generation facilities. Electricity is not charge flow...you call current. Electricity is charge alignment. The so called flow is a duty cycle of intermittent velocity, producing and average alignment. The flow has no go.

I am not sure of what you just described there .

This - ''

1. The moving magnets within the coil of wire cause electrons (charged particles) to move within the wire – this is electricity. ''

Is incorrect and NOT how electricity is formed .

Note to mods , this is not off topic as I associated light with EMF's etc ! It is all relevant to the discussion .

 

[Classical Motion]

Yes that is correct in a general way, an introductory way. But the electron can only be accelerated a very short distance in a very short time, before it collides, and ceases to be part of the current. The 'current" is only the charges that is moving in the same direction. Under acceleration. The collision bounce is backwards at multiple directions, not aligned. It's not current.

Only the acceleration alignment is the "current" They ignore the bounce current.

But it's the alignment that carries the torque energy of electricity at near c speeds. Even if you paint an electron and flow it for several minutes, it only goes a net millimeter of forward distance, because of all the bounces.

Current is in no way like water. More like air molecules.

 

[Thermoman]

Yes that is correct in a general way, an introductory way. But the electron can only be accelerated a very short distance in a very short time, before it collides, and ceases to be part of the current. The 'current" is only the charges that is moving in the same direction. Under acceleration. The collision bounce is backwards at multiple directions, not aligned. It's not current.

Only the acceleration alignment is the "current" They ignore the bounce current.

But it's the alignment that carries the torque energy of electricity at near c speeds. Even if you paint ant electron and flow it for several minutes, it only goes a net millimeter of forward distance, because of all the bounces.

Current is in no way like water.

No, the electrons don't exist , the magnetic field and the conductor spin creates new free electrons from out of space-time and then these are absorbed by the conductive force of the wire !

 

[Classical Motion]

ok

 

[Thermoman]

ok

Spaces conserved light that can be viewed as a Higgs ''field'' is slightly curved by the magnetic ''bottling'' of the magnet that causes the ''field lines to overlap''. This produces a 2 point 1 interaction that forms a free unbounded photon . But because of the spin of the conductor and the quantum friction , the free photon gains spin and circular motion . Hence an electon is formed to be grounded by the nearest conductive force .

 

[Thermoman]

ok

By the way , the Currie point of a magnet shows us that when a magnet is heated it loses its magnetism . The reason for this is because the extra light being emitted in the form of thermal heat , forces the magnetic field lines outwards in a linearity manner . (To be proven by experiment)

 

[Thermoman]

ok

The Magnets curved light is denser than a projected mirror image and space-time , that is why it is able to curve space-time in displacement . Essentially the magnetic field curved light has inertia against space-time energy inertia . So the light is able to move the light .

Its an Eigen value thing, no big deal .

 

[Rob77]

As far as I am aware , anywhere on the Globe the Sun rises to the left (East) and sets to the right (West) because of the left hand spin (anti-clockwise) of the Earth .

As far as I can tell , the Suns curved path could just be my own path and the Sun is always observed below the South pole way out into space.


In Australia I am predicting at Midday ish , they see the Sun above Antartica which actually below the Earth using 3d relativity .

As an Aussie living in Qld, its nearly the end of Spring coming into summer. I can guarantee that at midday we are looking more Northwards when the sun is overhead at midday. If we were looking at Antarctica it would be south of our position.
Funny story - was in Hawaii many moons ago and Americans seem to have a fascination with our geographic location, one couple thought were next door to Antarctica and its just a quick skip and a jump and were there, another thought during some months we would get daylight all year round like at the poles.

 

[Thermoman]

As an Aussie living in Qld, its nearly the end of Spring coming into summer. I can guarantee that at midday we are looking more Northwards when the sun is overhead at midday. If we were looking at Antarctica it would be south of our position.
Funny story - was in Hawaii many moons ago and Americans seem to have a fascination with our geographic location, one couple thought were next door to Antarctica and its just a quick skip and a jump and were there, another thought during some months we would get daylight all year round like at the poles.

Thanks for that but are you certain of your directions ? The reason I ask is because presently I am on google maps walking around Queensland , I am presently on a bridge over Norman River , route 27 . I am viewing the Sun in the pictures South East moving South . P.s sorry Mods was just replying to the poster !

Street View · Google Maps

Ort in Google Maps noch intensiver erleben.

www.google.co.uk

 

[Gibsense]

The Sun is ''below'' the Earth relatively . If somebody lies on their back in Australia , head directed north , they don't see the Sun North at the equator , they look '''down'' to the South Pole . We all see the Sun spatial South .

It is winter in England. COLGeek told you to consider tilt. Tilt is why the sun appears to be to the South. As we circumnavigate the sun then the apparent relative position changes. In summer in England, the sun goes almost to the Equator (in your Thermo speak).

 

[Thermoman]

It is winter in England. COLGeek told you to consider tilt. Tilt is why the sun appears to be to the South. As we circumnavigate the sun then the apparent relative position changes. In summer in England, the sun goes almost to the Equator (in your Thermo speak).

Well I don't believe that is the case . Yes there is some tilt but I beleive Quantum Buoyancy is the cause of seasons additionally !

I believe the Earth rises and lowers relative to amount of positive +ve energy in the system . A bit like hot air rising

 

[COLGeek]

Well I don't believe that is the case . Yes there is some tilt but I beleive Quantum Buoyancy is the cause of seasons additionally !

I believe the Earth rises and lowers relative to amount of positive +ve energy in the system . A bit like hot air rising

This is straying off course from well understood reality rather quickly.

 

[Thermoman]

This is straying off course from well understood reality rather quickly.

Sorry people are posting unrelated stuff so I am just replying to be polite !